Oruc
Reactionary
Nope!
Making a Historiographical distinction between Middle and Dark Ages
- Thread starter Yui108
- Start date
aelf
Ashen One
And the Gauls invented an harvesting machine.
aelf
Ashen One
It certainly took them some time to figure it out 
Pangur Bán
Deconstructed
It's entirely random, and has nothing to do with the non-European world, but here's how I would do it ... for fun:
235 to 1000: Early Middle Ages, vernacularisation of Latin culture, spread of Christianity everywhere between Ireland and Rus, development of cities in northern and eastern Europe, and so on.
1000 to 1348: High Middle Ages, population growth, specialisation of the economy to the degrees elsewhere in Eurasia, differentiation between Roman and Orthodox Christianity, growth of government, and so on
1348 to 1556: Breakdown of Latin Christianity, development of autocracy, spread of gunpowder, printing technology, vernacularisation of elites, discovery of new world, replacement of Roman Empire by Ottomans, and so on
235 to 1000: Early Middle Ages, vernacularisation of Latin culture, spread of Christianity everywhere between Ireland and Rus, development of cities in northern and eastern Europe, and so on.
1000 to 1348: High Middle Ages, population growth, specialisation of the economy to the degrees elsewhere in Eurasia, differentiation between Roman and Orthodox Christianity, growth of government, and so on
1348 to 1556: Breakdown of Latin Christianity, development of autocracy, spread of gunpowder, printing technology, vernacularisation of elites, discovery of new world, replacement of Roman Empire by Ottomans, and so on
Similar threads
