sydhe
King of Kongs
I'll take Nicopolis, Bayazed I vs. Sigismund because I think Thunderbolt is a cool nickname.
Nope. You got the Ottomans right tho.Rambuchan said:I'm going to stick my neck out to help get this going. Utterly selfless of course
These are early Ottomans, fighting in the Balkans, taking say Belgrade?
Therefore it is: Mehmet II vs. Szilágyi. June 29, 1456. Err Belgrade!
The turbans and short curved swords were what their cavalry were famed for in early days. It is mid-15th century because I am interpretting the clouds behind to be partly from cannon shots.
BTW - It's a poor reproduction, making it hard to see much detail. But then maybe that was the idea.
This is not true either.sydhe said:I'll take Nicopolis, Bayazed I vs. Sigismund because I think Thunderbolt is a cool nickname.
Not this one, sorry. The picture actually includes a very nice clue if you look carefully in the city. And there is a city in the background, if you haven't noticed. You can see a major landmark there.Oryctolagus said:It could be the battle of Mohacs between the Ottomans (Suleiman the Magnificient) and the Hungarians (Louis II) in 1526. The Hungarians lost, their king died and their country lost independence to the Ottoman Empire and Austria (I simplified the things here, of course).
We have a winner here. The reason i didn't go with the first answer was it was too vague. There was the siege of Vienna 1529 and Battle of Vienna 1683.sydhe said:He never actually said it wasn't Vienna.
Let's try Battle of Vienna, Kara Mustapha and John Sobieski, with Charles IV inside the city.
Yes, we did, starting with the revolution in 1789. Howver, during the Napoleonic wars, we also used a different pattern, with a white losange in the middle, and the red and blue in the anglesKosez said:But I don't know whether the French used tricolore at that time.