Mind Shuttering of the Alt Right

What's a context? Is that one of those made-up liberal phrases that obama and his Illumiati-Freemason cohorts created to opress the good hardworking amercians?
 
What's a context? Is that one of those made-up liberal phrases that obama and his Illumiati-Freemason cohorts created to opress the good hardworking amercians?

I think they just adopted it. It was made up sometime before them.
 
:lol:

When at a loss, try to play to the crowd. No doubt if that crowd were the comment's section at Breitbart they would be applauding your brilliance. Here though I suspect you will have to do a little more than cite a meme.

If three guys roll onto my street looking for a lone target to pick on there is a very good chance they will wind up being beaten down by a mob that vastly outnumbers them. Now, the simple of mind can say "the mob performed the same actions they claim to have been trying to prevent." This is possible because the simple of mind has no grasp of context.
But the only person Milo has ever "outed" was a transgender individual that had already talked about them being trans in a public interview.

I mean as much as I agree that the people in Breitbart's comments section must be living in a parallel universe or something, Milo is a guy who spoke about topics the left didn't like, that's the reason the far left opposed him. That you actually bought into this whole idea about Milo being there to out people, just shows that you're not living in reality either.
 
:lol:

When at a loss, try to play to the crowd. No doubt if that crowd were the comment's section at Breitbart they would be applauding your brilliance. Here though I suspect you will have to do a little more than cite a meme.
You literally seem as if you are making fun of yourself in that post. It's just such a blatant double standard.

If three guys roll onto my street looking for a lone target to pick on there is a very good chance they will wind up being beaten down by a mob that vastly outnumbers them. Now, the simple of mind can say "the mob performed the same actions they claim to have been trying to prevent." This is possible because the simple of mind has no grasp of context.
How is this in anyway analogous to giving a speech?

I mean, just look at this: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...protest-milo-yiannopoulos-breitbart/97378104/

What kinds of mental gymnastics do you need to do for that not to be bullying?
 
But the only person Milo has ever "outed" was a transgender individual that had already talked about them being trans in a public interview.

Milo got banned from Facebook for repeatedly organizing his followers into "flood attacks" on other Facebook users. Then he took his "show on the road" and did the same thing.
 
So basically he's a professional troll.
7680c716c00ce622f450f0dd879f440f.jpg
 
What kinds of mental gymnastics do you need to do for that not to be bullying?

None. What kind of blinders do you expect us to believe you are wearing that would make us accept that you don't see the parallels in my example?

Guys looking for trouble and finding it don't get to cry about it when the trouble they find isn't the kind they expected. Guys who go looking to gang up on someone don't get to cry when they get ganged up on instead. Guys who look to assault other people's freedom don't get to cry when their own are assaulted. It's pretty simple, really.
 
That's just...Sad.

Which brings us back to my point...the really sad thing is that the self described internet and real life troll has people who are motivated by that to follow him or pay to see him.
 
None. What kind of blinders do you expect us to believe you are wearing that would make us accept that you don't see the parallels in my example?
Well, reading the article, it says he was going to give a speech on cultural appropriation. Care to explain how that is analogous to jumping somebody on the street?

Guys looking for trouble and finding it don't get to cry about it when the trouble they find isn't the kind they expected. Guys who go looking to gang up on someone don't get to cry when they get ganged up on instead. Guys who look to assault other people's freedom don't get to cry when their own are assaulted. It's pretty simple, really.
Who's freedom is he trying to assault? Who is he trying to "gang up" on?
 
Who's freedom is he trying to assault? Who is he trying to "gang up" on?

I'd say that the same targets that he was banned from facebook for leading assaults on would be a good guess.
 
Well, unlike many of you, I do stand up for the right of free speech even for people with which I disagree. Because without free speech and free debate, our democracies erode.
Not everything warrants debate. NAMBLA, for example, do not warrant debate. Neo-Nazis warrant debate. This is something understood intuitively by everybody who isn't the So Dumb And Goddam Crazy character in a political cartoon- which makes me think you don't actually believe it, but have found it temporarily convenient, within the boundaries of this thread, to pretend that you do.

I mean, aside from anything else, you're on the record as support the Colonel's Regime, so, I mean, unless your political position has undergone a real spinaroo...
 
Last edited:
Which brings us back to my point...the really sad thing is that the self described internet and real life troll has people who are motivated by that to follow him or pay to see him.
The really sad thing that leftist got so triggered by online trolling that they threw smoke grenades, destroyed barriers, and started fires.

I'd say that the same targets that he was banned from facebook for leading assaults on would be a good guess.
I can't find anything about him being banned on facebook, or about him assaulting someone. In fact I see that he is not banned on facebook. Can you help out?
 
The really sad thing that leftist got so triggered by online trolling that they threw smoke grenades, destroyed barriers, and started fires.

Actually, the response to his online trolling was banning him. The response to his then taking his trolling on the road in real life was...banning him. It's just a little more challenging in real life.
 
Actually, the response to his online trolling was banning him. The response to his then taking his trolling on the road in real life was...banning him. It's just a little more challenging in real life.
So you support throwing smoke grenades, starting fires, and destroying barriers in order to stop someone you don't like from speaking?
 
So you support throwing smoke grenades, starting fires, and destroying barriers in order to stop someone you don't like from speaking?
There's surely a difference between "protest" and "specific thing that specific people did at a specific protest". I mean, regardless of how Tim feels, this is just a thoroughly dishonest question, like asking somebody if they prefer starvation or cannibalism.
 
So you support throwing smoke grenades, starting fires, and destroying barriers in order to stop someone you don't like from speaking?

Nahhh...you can speak all you want.

I am in favor of taking action to stop a self professed troll with a record for instigation of mob actions against innocents from addressing people who apparently want to be part of such a mob though.
 
Back
Top Bottom