Broken_Erika
Play with me.
What's a context? Is that one of those made-up liberal phrases that obama and his Illumiati-Freemason cohorts created to opress the good hardworking amercians?
What's a context? Is that one of those made-up liberal phrases that obama and his Illumiati-Freemason cohorts created to opress the good hardworking amercians?
But the only person Milo has ever "outed" was a transgender individual that had already talked about them being trans in a public interview.
When at a loss, try to play to the crowd. No doubt if that crowd were the comment's section at Breitbart they would be applauding your brilliance. Here though I suspect you will have to do a little more than cite a meme.
If three guys roll onto my street looking for a lone target to pick on there is a very good chance they will wind up being beaten down by a mob that vastly outnumbers them. Now, the simple of mind can say "the mob performed the same actions they claim to have been trying to prevent." This is possible because the simple of mind has no grasp of context.
You literally seem as if you are making fun of yourself in that post. It's just such a blatant double standard.
When at a loss, try to play to the crowd. No doubt if that crowd were the comment's section at Breitbart they would be applauding your brilliance. Here though I suspect you will have to do a little more than cite a meme.
How is this in anyway analogous to giving a speech?If three guys roll onto my street looking for a lone target to pick on there is a very good chance they will wind up being beaten down by a mob that vastly outnumbers them. Now, the simple of mind can say "the mob performed the same actions they claim to have been trying to prevent." This is possible because the simple of mind has no grasp of context.
But the only person Milo has ever "outed" was a transgender individual that had already talked about them being trans in a public interview.
What kinds of mental gymnastics do you need to do for that not to be bullying?
So basically he's a professional troll.
That's just...Sad.
Well, reading the article, it says he was going to give a speech on cultural appropriation. Care to explain how that is analogous to jumping somebody on the street?None. What kind of blinders do you expect us to believe you are wearing that would make us accept that you don't see the parallels in my example?
Who's freedom is he trying to assault? Who is he trying to "gang up" on?Guys looking for trouble and finding it don't get to cry about it when the trouble they find isn't the kind they expected. Guys who go looking to gang up on someone don't get to cry when they get ganged up on instead. Guys who look to assault other people's freedom don't get to cry when their own are assaulted. It's pretty simple, really.
Who's freedom is he trying to assault? Who is he trying to "gang up" on?
Not everything warrants debate. NAMBLA, for example, do not warrant debate. Neo-Nazis warrant debate. This is something understood intuitively by everybody who isn't the So Dumb And Goddam Crazy character in a political cartoon- which makes me think you don't actually believe it, but have found it temporarily convenient, within the boundaries of this thread, to pretend that you do.Well, unlike many of you, I do stand up for the right of free speech even for people with which I disagree. Because without free speech and free debate, our democracies erode.
The really sad thing that leftist got so triggered by online trolling that they threw smoke grenades, destroyed barriers, and started fires.Which brings us back to my point...the really sad thing is that the self described internet and real life troll has people who are motivated by that to follow him or pay to see him.
I can't find anything about him being banned on facebook, or about him assaulting someone. In fact I see that he is not banned on facebook. Can you help out?I'd say that the same targets that he was banned from facebook for leading assaults on would be a good guess.
The really sad thing that leftist got so triggered by online trolling that they threw smoke grenades, destroyed barriers, and started fires.
So you support throwing smoke grenades, starting fires, and destroying barriers in order to stop someone you don't like from speaking?Actually, the response to his online trolling was banning him. The response to his then taking his trolling on the road in real life was...banning him. It's just a little more challenging in real life.
There's surely a difference between "protest" and "specific thing that specific people did at a specific protest". I mean, regardless of how Tim feels, this is just a thoroughly dishonest question, like asking somebody if they prefer starvation or cannibalism.So you support throwing smoke grenades, starting fires, and destroying barriers in order to stop someone you don't like from speaking?
Sure. One is being a violent jerk, the other is just being a jerk. And tim seems to support both.There's surely a difference between "protest" and "specific thing that specific people did at a specific protest".
Milo is hardly in much of a position to scold others for being "a jerk".Sure. One is being a violent jerk, the other is just being a jerk. And tim seems to support both.
So you support throwing smoke grenades, starting fires, and destroying barriers in order to stop someone you don't like from speaking?