Moderators aren't as bold as they used to be...

:lol: When I read the topic title of this thread, I thought superslug was saying that they weren't banning or warning as much as they used to.
 
Do you really think this thread would have gotten to two pages if it was about that? :p

@Lefty: AAAHHHHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, whats with the new avatar? :(
 
Hmm. No bolding makes mods look like regular posters, and the other way around. We can all pretend to be mods :lol: :rotfl: .
 
Before some of you begin to think about it, let me remind you that pretending to be mods is a severe offence. ;)
 
I'm all for the stealth mods... everyone would have to be super alert, cause they wouldn't know who's a mod ;)

Strike without warning and leave no trace... except in the logs, obviously.
 
Originally posted by Duke of Marlbrough
XIII will, I'll just ban you and find out the details later.

Isn't that the Official Policy, ban first, ask questions later?

lol, I don't want any Mods to get any wrong ideas now . . .
 
^
|

*asking for it*
 
Originally posted by RealGoober
Isn't that the Official Policy, ban first, ask questions later?

lol, I don't want any Mods to get any wrong ideas now . . .

:hmm: *thinks about it...*
 
Originally posted by Duke of Marlbrough
XIII will, I'll just ban you and find out the details later.

hey that poster said "the" that's illegal now isn't it? yeah! i get to try out my 'SuperBanneramaic3000©'

later:
But TF, you gave us these positions to help stop bad people from disrupting CFC, and as we know, no one is perfect, so they aren't good enough, so they aren't good, so they are bad, so they disrupt people, and since they're here, they are bad at CFC, so technically that was a bad person disrupting CFC
 
Back
Top Bottom