The trouble with our *contest* laws
The thread where these arguments took place was the monthy PCX contest thread. As of late there have been various discussions, perhaps not very prolonged, however at any rate even so having given at least in some respects quite evident impressions of the existense of division in views about the clarity or even the general accurateness of the old rules of the PCX contest. The discussion started by Varwnos, or rather after a brief note by Yorgos, one of the observers of the competition, with Varwnos being a regular contributor in them. Yorgos had mentioned that, in his view, copy/pasted, converted, or otherwise modified graphics should not be taking part in opossition to entirely original graphics. His comment probably was not meant as one which would trigger a discussion, and it is agreed that one was forced to take place only after Varwnos picked it up and noted in a lot less uncertain terms that his opinnion was that definately original work should not be placed next to modified unoriginal one. The discussion which started in earnest following that post, however, resulted in nothing less of a very straight-forward denial of the notion that modified graphics should not be allowed, as was stated by the rule-maker of the contest, Flamand. Varwnos decided to back from his request, and so the first instance of the talk regarding the status of the modified graphics in the competition was brought to an end.
However, after some more posts, the matter was again revived, this time though not as an issue of whether or not unoriginal graphics should be allowed entry to the competition, but whether a specific such graphic should be allowed to participate without being labelled as a modified one. The owner of that graphic, mrtn, who had before that taken part in the first discussion as well, supporting the inclusion of modified graphics, now argued that his graphic should not carry the title of modified or copy/pasted, or converted, whereas very briefly Flamand had agreed to label it as such. Mrtn's argument was that his graphic is not a converted one, since it consisted of graphics from two different games, which were not to be found in the arrangement particular to them in his own creation. He also mentioned the fact that another creator, aaglo, had provided a part of them.
Mrtn's argument was accepted as true by Flamand, and thus the labeling of his file was taken away again, at which point Varwnos remarked again about the state of the laws of the competition.
It is to be understood that Varwnos's argument - he noted that the rules of the competition appeared to be ever-changing, semi-whimsically or at least partly very obviously out of mere reaction to the requests of the posters- was centered on the rather obscure logic of the dismissal of the labelling. In earnest, what appeared to have happened was that the simple note by mrtn that his graphic was modded from two different games carried some weight in Flamand's decision, whereas this did not seem to be in accordance with what had been previously expected of him. Also it is theorised that Varwnos's note also was one in the formation of which there had been made consideration of the labelling of another creators graphic, Storm Grant's as a mopdified/copy-pasted one, when that graphic too consisted of edited graphics taken from two different sources. This part was not mentioned by Varwnos, probabgly because of an estimated general lack of a will to revive in full the old discussion about modded graphics, however it is quite probable that it was part of his own comment. The discussion, being seen however despite all that supposed attempt to downplay it as such, in the end as trully one which would potentially escalate to another version of the older one, was ended by Flamand, in a midly sarcastic note which possibly was formed in such a way so as to allow for a soothing end to it, without really answering the comments which had been made, and taking advantage also of the probable general negative mood which had surrounded the matter, despite of the downplay.
This was a brief account of the recent events in the contest thread. Such is the state of affairs in it, and yet one has to lower his fingers once again, and allow them to dance from key to key, so as to form yet another carefully thought-through, but even more carefully examined as of its general pointlesness in sight of so powerfull urges against the supporting of any argument which essentially would be again echoing of the will for division between types of graphics, sentence.
(ps: before stormrage suffers a heart-attack: the above was written as a parody of a small text by kafka

)