You said the British did not become Indianized and I'm telling you the Romans did not become Britishized. Both powers brought innovations and laws in a similar manner. I'm not talking about England I'm talking about Britain in the antiquity age. I would rather Britain than England in the game as the eras are too broad. It's not as general as you make out there are millions of people living in Britain with majority celtic ancestry. Just to clarify you don't want Britons in antiquity?
I think the conflict in reasoning here is that the pathway in question is not going from inhabitants of the British isles to Rome, like it would be for India to Britain, but from Rome to later inhabitants of the British Isles. Thus, the question of whether the Romans adopted the culture isn't what's up for debate, it's whether Roman culture served as a basis for later cultures in Britain. I would say yes, thus, Rome as the Antiquity predecessor of Britain is fine.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
