Naming the new forum...

Status
Not open for further replies.
What about Tea and Coffee
or.......
Coke and Pepsi. Coke being the serious one and pepsi has all the Fluff.

Vanilla and Chocolate. Vanilla is boring reiligious/political and chocolate is fun stuff.

Ying and Yang.... I dont know which is which but one is good and the other not too good.

Felix and Oscar. Felix is the straight religion/politics and Oscar is the cool fun other stuff.


Abbott and costello. naaah thats just being silly.
 
Originally posted by Sir Eric
Ying and Yang.... I dont know which is which but one is good and the other not too good.

It is Yin & Yang.... Yin has no G.

Anyway: your ideas suck ;) .
 
Originally posted by Sir Eric

Felix and Oscar. Felix is the straight religion/politics and Oscar is the cool fun other stuff.

Felix is the straight one? I always thought he was the gay one.

Anyway: your ideas suck;) :lol: :lol: :lol: Brutal honesty is so refreshing:lol:
 
Since I prefer the debate-side to the off-topic-lite side, I suggest:

The House of Commons (fluffy) and The House of Lords (debate)

This will enable me to feel superior. :)

Otherwise, it should be named something to with Civ like:

The U.N. and the Great Library.

Abide by the poll though, please!
 
No way do my ideas suck, they crank!!

Felix wasn't 'obviously' gay, he's like Niles and Frasier. It's just a hint without it being blatant. Kind of like Gilligan was;)

Lets see you guys do better :p
 
Originally posted by Sir Eric
No way do my ideas suck, they crank!!

Felix wasn't 'obviously' gay, he's like Niles and Frasier. It's just a hint without it being blatant. Kind of like Gilligan was;)

Lets see you guys do better :p

How DARE you imply Gilligan was gay (not that theres anything wrong with that). Gilligan was just a little slow thats all. The Professor was obviously the gay one. Anyway, so I dont get a tongue lashing (not that theres anything wrong with that) for being OT, here are my ideas if OT being hacked to bits is a done deal:

Science Forum

OT Lite Forum (mindless fluff)
 
No your idea about the science forum reminds me of what my old professor said Was Not always a true fact, albeit a lighthearted even a Gay idea.
Professor Gilligan i think his name Was, once said that The truly happy or Gay person was a scienctific One
 
Originally posted by Sir Eric
No your idea about the science forum reminds me of what my old professor said Was Not always a true fact, albeit a lighthearted even a Gay idea.
Professor Gilligan i think his name Was, once said that The truly happy or Gay person was a scienctific One

:lol: Very clever! Almost didnt get it. For a minute there I thought you were off your rocker:lol:

Cant believe what I just read! I know you dont wish me any harm, but I think I should gingerly reply to your statements and tread carefully here. First of all, I dont like being treated like Typhoid Mary merely because we dissagree. Im no Anne Boleyn, to be casually decapitated and silenced. If all members of this forum were treated in such a fashion, the number of members would decline rapidly. As Gay Talese once said " If ones honor is questioned, be bold."

How about:
Library - for serious discussion
Marketplace - funstuff/fluff
 
This is ridiculous.

XIII has an idea, makes his proposal, the members vote against yet we have it anyway?!

So many good reasons and votes against, yet nothing...

What a sham the whole event of getting the members opinions was.
 
Subtle, Eric, real sublte.

*whistles* *Boom* And there's the sound of this thread hitting an all time low at CFC.

Wait a minute. . .we can call the fluffy one Ginger, and the serious one Mary Ann. . . . Hmmm. . . .
 
Originally posted by XIII
45 out of 85 hardly makes 'most of us'.

Um, yes it does.

It certainly doesn't suggest people are in favour of the change (they are in the minority). And to push through such a major change would surely require more than a simple majority anyway.

The number of votes are in favour of keeping things as they are.

There have been very few decent arguments for the new forums when compared with the arguments against.
 
Call the one thing "Off Topic" and the other one "Spam", then deactivate post count in the spam forum. Ban everyone who posts one line posts or even smiley posts in any other forum than the spam forum.

Then split the spam forum into "Spam" and "Booyah" forums just for the sake of splitting forums.
 
The Soapbox would be my choice for the "Dark" forum.
 
I don't want a split of the off topic. But if we are forced to have it, no matter how many people say no, then I would sugest these names:

Serious off-topic: Straight debate.
Not-serious off-topic: Gay talking.


btw... religion shouldn't come under Serious Off topic, it should be under Humor and Jokes forum....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom