New election rules for judicial branch?

[KCCrusader]

I just nominated myself for all three position and go to thinking, why are all three positions selected separately? For the most part the same people are nominated for all three positions, why not just have one election and the top three winners gain the positions? Of course this sets up a dillema if there is one person running who is an obvious choice and gets all of the votes. Is there a way to make people vote for exactly three things on a list vote? if so this would simplify the election procedure for judges, and keep me from having to copy and paste my responses to every board where the same questions are asked :-D

 

[Immortal]

At the beginning of the elctions we decided that 3 options was best, not everyone wants to run for JA or PD, perhaps only CJ.

It has been raised before, so you arent alone in the opion.

 

[Epimethius]

Sounds like yet another time when preferential voting would be good.

Just like the voting I'd use to let the citizens decide the order of new city building if elected Minister of Domestic Affairs.