Obamagate

Status
Not open for further replies.
GhostWriter16 said:
Should Obama be impeached? Removed? Incarcerated?
Click to expand...

He should refuse to testify under oath or in Public like President Bush did when over 3000 US people were killed despite over 200 warning regarding an imminent terrorist attack inside the US.
 
GhostWriter16 said:
Well, if it was an accident that does somewhat reduce the culpability although it does not remove it entirely.

That's not the vibe I get from the articles I linked, however. It seems like he knew and chose not to do anything about it.
Click to expand...

My guess, 70% accident, 20% keep-the-story-the-same-after-the-mistake, 10% x-factor.

Not enough to be a scandal or indict their foreign policy, but enough to give them sharp criticism.
 
FriendlyFire said:
He should refuse to testify under oath or in Public like President Bush did when over 3000 US people were killed despite over 200 warning regarding an imminent terrorist attack inside the US.
Click to expand...

I didn't defend Bush here. Nor are we talking about the guy who is NOT in office right now.

Is there really any evidence that Bush knew about 9/11?

Hygro said:
My guess, 70% accident, 20% keep-the-story-the-same-after-the-mistake, 10% x-factor.

Not enough to be a scandal or indict their foreign policy, but enough to give them sharp criticism.
Click to expand...

Do you really think what is 30% not an accident should be so casually swept under the rug?

I think maybe we should be swearing in Biden right now...
 
GhostWriter16 said:
Well, if it was an accident that does somewhat reduce the culpability although it does not remove it entirely.

That's not the vibe I get from the articles I linked, however. It seems like he knew and chose not to do anything about it.
Click to expand...

And what would he do? Airdrop SpecOps into the compound who happen to be already on a plane en route just in case something like this happened?
 
Cheezy the Wiz said:
And what would he do? Airdrop SpecOps into the compound who happen to be already on a plane en route just in case something like this happened?
Click to expand...

That's a fair criticsm. Maybe there really isn't anything he could have done.

I really don't know. You may be right.

Even so, lying about it is unacceptable.
 
GhostWriter16 said:
That's a fair criticsm. Maybe there really isn't anything he could have done.

I really don't know. You may be right.

Even so, lying about it is unacceptable.
Click to expand...
You did read your first link? Obama indicated the truth in his first interview. He also called it an act of terror the next day in the Rose Garden. You guys need to stop stroking yourselves off over this or at least keep it private.
 
Stupid sarcasm though. (Nevermind the lack of smilie.) That it wasn't Clinton's fault (Which I certainly acknowledge) does not mean that it is, or is not, Bush's fault.

It is, of course, less stupid to blame Bush than to blame Clinton. But that doesn't mean it was definitely Bush.

It doesn't matter, I have enough dirt on Bush. Two wars, Dept. Homeland Security (I thought the Dept of Defense was supposed to do that stuff.) Patriot Act. TSA. Exc.

Unless there's evidence for it, I don't NEED to say that he also overlooked 9/11 to say that his Presidency was a disaster.

I don't NEED this to say that Obama has been a disaster as well. This just tops the cake with icing.
 
What I meant was that if Obama hadn't done this, I'd still think he was a horrible President. Its not like I thought he was all great and then this happened and I did a 180.

If I liked Obama though, I certainly wouldn't now. This is very, very serious.
 
What is serious? You haven't really said anything thing except you have a vibe. We can't impeach the President just because you are going New Age on us.
 
um

I'll give you a HW assignment to read the article and write a summary of it. Maybe just 2 paragraphs. Due tomorrow.

I think that the result will be a lot different than whatever "vibe" you have dommy.

obviously communications was pretty poorly handled but this article just explicitly does the opposite of what you think it does dommy (ninja edit- in relation to Obama specifically)
 
GhostWriter16 said:
How is that even possible? Clinton was not in office at the time. And I'm no Clinton fan either.
Click to expand...

he had 8 years to get our behinds out of the Middle East - I dont think its a coincidence both attacks on the WTC were early into new administrations - the new Prez was given a chance to change direction and they stayed the course
 
You never really stated what this allegedly heinous and impeachable offense is.

...And I think it's about time we placed a tax on the hackneyed -gate suffix.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom