One Last Hand [WW/Mafia, Play In-Progress]

[Snerk]

'Round these parts we don't edit posts.

Nah CFC mafia has a proud history of post edits. It's up to the GM to decide the rules and AK hasn't stated that editing is not allowed.

 

[Apollo's Extrails]

I'll share a song like snerk did though. nice to know i can do this.

 

[Arakhor]

You two are claiming to be the Champ and the Gambler, on Day One, no less? Why would you do that?!

 

[Apollo's Extrails]

I'm not claiming champ. I just like that song and thought it was appropriate wait was he claiming gambler? I just like the song and thought he wanted to share a casino themed one. I honestly had no intention of claiming through that song.
Since even if i did read as if i was a champ i could easily be a beginners luck without knowing it i'm not claiming champ I repeat not claiming champ. Fudge i'm goign to die tonight thanks arakhor

 

[Snerk]

You two are claiming to be the Champ and the Gambler, on Day One, no less? Why would you do that?!

Firstly, Kenny Rogers is king and I do not need to excuse my actions. Secondly, do not assume you know the ways of the Snerk. I claim nothing. Thirdly, there is no thirdly. Fourdly, breadcrumbling/softclaiming isn't a bad thing, though sometimes less is more, Apollo...

 

[Yakostovian]

I'll claim Card Sharp

 

[Snerk]

I have no idea what that means but you're showing initiative and I like it.

 

[AvatarKhepri]

I'd prefer for editing to be kept to a minimum, if possible.

 

[Takhisis]

I have no idea what that means but you're showing initiative and I like it.

<roll to dodge>

 

[Yakostovian]

<roll to dodge>

Attack roll 17. Does a 22 hit your AC?

 

[Takhisis]

Snerk's the dodgy one, not me.

 

[Takhisis]

Gamblers aren't fallacious!

How would you know?

 

[topsecret]

I'll claim Card Sharp

I will claim if some certain bandwagon followers don't change their votes, they are going to lynch an innocent person - me.

But whatever, it's not like Rakkoon and Arakhor were scum partners last time. It is not as if Arakhor bandwagon-voted me...

 

[Xym]

But whatever, it's not like Rakkoon and Arakhor were scum partners last time. It is not as if Arakhor bandwagon-voted me...

What's the underlined got to do with this game?
He was second to vote for you out of three, is that still bandwagonning?
Why didn't you switch to someone who already had a vote to increase the odds of you surviving by making it 3 to 2?

 

[topsecret]

What's the underlined got to do with this game?

Nothing. They are all voting me because it is Day 1, so my reasoning need not be sound either.

He was second to vote for you out of three, is that still bandwagonning?

It was the first double-vote, but see my answer to your first question in terms of how serious I take this. I haven't voted for him, have I? If I thought it was that suspicious, I would've already voted for him.

Why didn't you switch to someone who already had a vote to increase the odds of you surviving by making it 3 to 2?

Because I want to see how people react before making a vote. I switched several times last game and that was not a good move, so I am sticking with my nonsense D1 vote until I decide who to vote for?

My turn to ask questions. What about you, Xym? What do you think of me, the three votes upon me, and everything in general so far?

 

[Rakkoon]

My vote for topsecret was a D1 nonsense vote. No other reason. Topsecret is saying he is town, there is some interaction, we'll see how this goes.

 

[Snerk]

Quiet, too quiet.

vote: Murska

Some gut leans, mayhaps?

 

[Xym]

Nothing. They are all voting me because it is Day 1, so my reasoning need not be sound either.

It was the first double-vote, but see my answer to your first question in terms of how serious I take this. I haven't voted for him, have I? If I thought it was that suspicious, I would've already voted for him.

Because I want to see how people react before making a vote. I switched several times last game and that was not a good move, so I am sticking with my nonsense D1 vote until I decide who to vote for?

My turn to ask questions. What about you, Xym? What do you think of me, the three votes upon me, and everything in general so far?

Not sound is fine, it just seemed a little misleading.

I was just after clarification there.

In a bubble either can be good, it depends on what's said and done alongside. It seemed weird to me to be worried about being lynched in a post and then not acting on it.

Fair enough. As for you, I'm not sure either way. If anything ever so slightly wolfy for the oddity above. As for the votes, the first one's a joke one, the second a joke also that is based on a pregame joke vote.
The third is as well and goes in depth explaining that.

Apollo's Extrails seems quite nervous to me. It seems more sus than Topsecret, so I'll unvote; vote: Apollo's Extrails
I'm sure the videos aren't soft claims but just banter.

Snerk is right that it is quiet, but pointing it out without adding doesn't always necessarily help.

Quiet, too quiet.

vote: Murska

Some gut leans, mayhaps?

Do you have any?

 

[Snerk]

Do you have any?

Apollo's Extrails: Awkward obvious softclaim. Don’t see why non-pressured wolf would do that D1..
Arakhor: His why would you ever softclaim D1!!?? overreaction pinged me.
Murska: Quiet and sneaky. Though was the same last game and flipped town
Rakkoon: null
Takhisis: up to his usual tricks
Topsecret: Seems less solve-y than last game.
Xym: Seems more solve-y than last game
Yakostovian: null

Right now: Murska, Arakhor or Topsecret. It’s the guttiest of guttest tho.

 

[Snerk]

I'm sure the videos aren't soft claims but just banter.

Why?