grandad1982
Deity
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2007
- Messages
- 2,552
No stone in the BFC then.
No stone in the BFC then.
I was kind of hoping some of the whip overflow or chopping would go into SH for the multiplication from IND. Leaving SH to much longer is running the risk of lossing it IMO.
Maybe grow to 4 before finishing the settler then whip into SH?
A & C per Grandad
Only thing I'd question is the need for those jungle cities ASAP. As far as we can see, three of your four dots are not contested by the AI's.
I was under the impression we were trying to get two Settlers out as a priority, and there was even the suggestion that we wouldn't be going for Stonehenge.
Jungle can also scream Specialist Economy. I must say that I'm quite surprised that with an Industrious leader and nearby Stone that The Pyramids is even a debate, let alone a losing debate. As I say, I'm happy to go with the majority, but I'm still surprised.
I don't mind if we delay our attack and take on Mansa's '1-2 First Strike' Skirmishers with Horse Archers rather than run the risk of a backfiring Axe rush. I acknowledge that Archery and Horseback Riding are notorious 'non priorities' usually, but given the Skirmisher, it could save us some grief.
I also don't mind a mixed economy.
Only look in here if you want to get annoyed with me and my city placement ideas (confusion may ensue)
Spoiler :
A city NW of Stone and a city SW of the cows
Cow city picks up a useless sea tile but thats not to bad.
I did say this would annoy and confuse....