Personality Type

[Fifty]

Quite wierd how many INTJs we have here, considering the 1% of the pop. thing

 

[feline_dacat]

Quite wierd how many INTJs we have here, considering the 1% of the pop. thing

Maybe we can conclude that most of that 1% likes to frequent online forums regarding Civilisation?

 

[stormbind]

Or maybe readers of this forum did not spend enough time thinking about the questions?

Another site gave a different result.

 

[CoolioVonHoolio]

ESTP... whatever that means..

 

[Milan's Warrior]

Situations are described to such a degree of generality that I am unable to answer to any of the questions. It feels like answering at random.

 

[Sparta]

Quite wierd how many INTJs we have here, considering the 1% of the pop. thing

Another INTJ here as well; that personality type (and Rational (NT) in general) does seem to congregate here disproportionately. Seems to fit well with the Civ theme, as feline dacat pointed out:

Spoiler Description Articles :

Of the four aspects of strategic analysis and definition, it is the contingency planning or entailment organizing role that reaches the highest development in Masterminds. Entailing or contingency planning is not an informative activity, rather it is a directive one in which the planner tells others what to do and in what order to do it. As the organizing capabilities the Masterminds increase so does their inclination to take charge of whatever is going on.
...
Once in charge, however, Masterminds are the supreme pragmatists, seeing reality as a crucible for refining their strategies for goal-directed action. In a sense, Masterminds approach reality as they would a giant chess board, always seeking strategies that have a high payoff, and always devising contingency plans in case of error or adversity. To the Mastermind, organizational structure and operational procedures are never arbitrary, never set in concrete, but are quite malleable and can be changed, improved, streamlined. In their drive for efficient action, Masterminds are the most open-minded of all the types.

INTJs are known as the "Systems Builders" of the types, perhaps in part because they possess the unusual trait combination of imagination and reliability. Whatever system an INTJ happens to be working on is for them the equivalent of a moral cause to an INFJ; both perfectionism and disregard for authority may come into play, as INTJs can be unsparing of both themselves and the others on the project.

 

[stormbind]

Situations are described to such a degree of generality that I am unable to answer to any of the questions. It feels like answering at random.

Does that make you ISFP?

 

[Prince Lek]

INTJ, should of read more about what that means before i closed the window

 

[Milan's Warrior]

Does that make you ISFP?

According to the test it makes me an ENFP

I have just been reading the categories on wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers_briggs
I would say that I was born an E but progressively acquired some I traits.
I definitely am an N
I am probably one of the most extreme T that I know for my job and my PhD, but I am happy to live by F for most of my daily decisions (food, gym, where to live, whom I like to mingle with).
I used to be an extreme J but now I am a mixture of J and P

 

[Sparta]

INTJ, should of read more about what that means before i closed the window

Link 1

Link 2

 

[Urederra]

It is cool to be in the 1 % of the population, It is kinda elite.

BTW, How do they know Hannibal's test result? How do they know that he had a tidy desk, or house or elephant, for that matter?

 

[greekguy]

ISTJ, just like my dad....the apple doesn't fall far from the tree.

 

[Birdjaguar]

At the moment INTJ is the leadig group at 31%. Here is some of the analysis of that group:

Personal relationships, particularly romantic ones, can be the INTJ's Achilles heel. While they are capable of caring deeply for others (usually a select few), and are willing to spend a great deal of time and effort on a relationship, the knowledge and self-confidence that make them so successful in other areas can suddenly abandon or mislead them in interpersonal situations.

This happens in part because many INTJs do not readily grasp the social rituals; for instance, they tend to have little patience and less understanding of such things as small talk and flirtation (which most types consider half the fun of a relationship). To complicate matters, INTJs are usually extremely private people, and can often be naturally impassive as well, which makes them easy to misread and misunderstand. Perhaps the most fundamental problem, however, is that INTJs really want people to make sense. This sometimes results in a peculiar naivete', paralleling that of many Fs -- only instead of expecting inexhaustible affection and empathy from a romantic relationship, the INTJ will expect inexhaustible reasonability and directness.

 

[stormbind]

Where does the negative data come from?

I would like to read some bad stuff about INFJ

 

[Birdjaguar]

Where does the negative data come from?

I would like to read some bad stuff about INFJ

This link has a discussion on each type. I selected just the stuff related to interpersonal affairs, because of the R U seeing someone thread.

http://typelogic.com/intj.html

 

[Cuivienen]

I was pretty middle-of-the-line. INTJ, but just barely:

Slightly-expressed Introvert
Moderately-expressed Intuitive
Slightly-expressed Thinking
Slightly-expressed Judging

(I fixed up the formatting.)

 

[frekk]

INTP, which suits me to a tee.

 

[newfangle]

INTJ with heavy leanings to ENTJ. It has been this way for over 5 years, dispite numerous cataclysmic changes to my views.

 

[Godwynn]

dispite numerous cataclysmic changes to my views.

You used to be a commie?!

 

[DiamanteLouco]

Infp
53 38 12 67

EDIT:
Wow, reading the description now makes me really understands myself a little bit more, I really am "abstract in thought and speech" (if abstract means confusing, if it means random, not so much) and I do "care deeply-indeed, passionately-about a few special persons". (of course, I deeply-indeed, passionately hate everyone else)

EDIT:
OMFG, this is so ****ing true, maybe I´m really predictable or maybe I´m just easily influenced, but it´s like reading a ****ing biography.
I´m scared to hell. (not the first time Jung seems to understand me so much, although I have to ask how much of his test is his and how much is "oh, let´s put Jung name in it because he is famous")