Depends.
Some do, some don't, some make their demos time-limited to incite people to try or miss out, others add a pricetag on getting early hands-on with the game.
For instance:
Metaphor:ReFantazio has a 6 hour demo.
Dragon Age The Veilguard does not.
Monster Hunter: Wilds just had a public beta close to release (effectively a demo).
Manor Lords had a demo, but only for a limited time at a Steam event.
Age of Mythology: Retold has no demo, had a short public beta, and if you paid extra you could start playing a week earlier.
A game having a demo is always a good thing for the player, but it's one of those things that, at least on PC, isn't required of devs as standard.
No questions asked refund policies (even when very limited time) of game market places function as OP asks for from a demo. You can start the game and see if it runs. So no need to do short demo versions.
I remember Civ 5 definitely had a playable demo before the game was released because I played it before purchasing the full game. Beyond Earth also had a playable demo before release because I played it before deciding it wasn't a game for me. I don't remember if Civ 6 had one because I preordered it as soon as I could, so it was irrelevant to me.
No questions asked refund policies (even when very limited time) of game market places function as OP asks for from a demo. You can start the game and see if it runs. So no need to do short demo versions.
Increasingly on steam, specially smaller studios. Cynically we can see it as a way of getting better customer reviews by ensuring that only people who like are very likely to like the game but it.
The lack of demos has long been decried as anticonsumer.
Now more studios are letting people play the game without buying it and in many cases carry over progress to the full game, and there’s an insinuation it’s to protect against bad user reviews?
What’s the winning move they can make without drawing unfounded suspicion, then? Give people their full games for free and let them pay if they feel like it?
While it could be interesting, it is always harder to do with a gamer like civ where a match goes on for long and things changes a lot as you progress on the game. They need to come up with a demo idea that don't let a person play the whole game, as it is a demo, but that gives and idea of it all. Hopefully they can make something that works.
But if you're just worried if it will work on your pc, the refund policies on steam and the like tend to work well for that.
A demo would be nice, sure. But I don't expect it. It would need to be made carefully, for sure, else it's piracy heaven. Imagine having an entire age, virtually 1/3 of the entire game and due to eras being contained a game in itself, being unlocked. I fear 2K won't risk that.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.