Post your city plans here

OK, here is my city plan.

The sites are numbered from 1 to 15, but I have changed the order since then.

There are three rings of cities in this plan, as you may see. (you may also notice a forth right that I covered over - sadly, the undo button doesn't go as far as I would have liked)

Please feel free to suggest your own orders. I will ammend this later. My suggested orders are:

A) as the numbers say - not the best order.

B) In the following order: Ring 1: 1, 2, 5, 11, 4; then Ring 2: 3, 9, 10, 7; then Ring 3: 6, 8, 12, 13, 15
This order is logical, from inside to out.

C) Outside in technique - Ring 3: 12, 13, 15, 14, 6, 8; then Ring 1, then ring 2 as shown in suggestion B.

EDIT: Thanks HEAPS to TF and shaitan for removing those pics. I will put them on an attachment.
 
and it's not protected or secret :eek:

however it looks like a good plan.
 
I think that several of those spots are going to be good city sites. However, I fear that they may be too far apart to be properly defended.

Personally, while I often look to spread my cities out nicely in SP games, I think that a tighter build plan is the way to go in this game.
 
I keep thinking the grid in that tundra is a brown border.

Anyway, is anyone else a little worried about how accessible this picture is?
 
OK, here is the image as an attachment, so it should be secure.
 

Attachments

  • msdgcityplanvv.jpg
    msdgcityplanvv.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 84
I still think #1 is by far the best. It will give at size one 7 commerce per turn.
 
Site one all the way!
 
after corruption maybe 5 commerce per turn?
 
Top Bottom