Questions & Answers

[Cetrix]

I'll do that, thanks again.

 

[warrior73]

IF I am repeating something that has already been asked sorry. There is alot to read through on this thread.
I had the Turks respawn. When asked I said let them go because I could not afford a war. I understand them getting back their cities but why did they get a city they never had Akkad. I took it from the Babylonians the Turks never had this city. I just do not understand how they respawned in the middle of my empire. The other cities they got were expected because they had been turkish cities.
Could some one explain how the respawn determines what cities they get? Unlike new civs I was not told what cities would flip.

 

[flaming_iles]

IF I am repeating something that has already been asked sorry. There is alot to read through on this thread.
I had the Turks respawn. When asked I said let them go because I could not afford a war. I understand them getting back their cities but why did they get a city they never had Akkad. I took it from the Babylonians the Turks never had this city. I just do not understand how they respawned in the middle of my empire. The other cities they got were expected because they had been turkish cities.
Could some one explain how the respawn determines what cities they get? Unlike new civs I was not told what cities would flip.

When any civ respawns, they get every city in their 'core area' irregardless of whether they hav ever owned it. You can find a map of each core area at

http://civ4.technologyresourcesgroup.com/

Hope that helps

 

[kairob]

But remember they only take cities from civs with low stability. IIRC

 

[warrior73]

Thanks I think that explained it. Akkad was in their UHV area.
My economy was what kept pulling me down. I had too many vassals. Plus I believe I had just switched to emancipation which caused instability.

 

[Maucat]

A simple question: how can I have a screenshot of the actual map for saving it?

Thanks.

 

[Opferlamm]

A simple question: how can I have a screenshot of the actual map for saving it?

Thanks.

something like that?

 

[Maucat]

Not properly, a screenshot of the actual image in the video...simply , for saving it or for posting it in a 3d of the Forum...
Please help me, thanks.

 

[Opferlamm]

Not properly, a screenshot of the actual image in the video...simply , for saving it or for posting it in a 3d of the Forum...
Please help me, thanks.

you mean a ingame screenshot?
press "Print" on your keyboard, you will find the screenshot in your own data/my games/bts/screenshot directory

 

[Maucat]

you mean a ingame screenshot?
press "Print" on your keyboard, you will find the screenshot in your own data/my games/bts/screenshot directory

Ok
Thanks...

 

[Lokolus]

I know it's a bit off topic, but what happened to Rhye's of Europe?

 

[Walliard]

Does the Arab UHV require shrines or just holy cities?

 

[AnotherPacifist]

Does the Arab UHV require shrines or just holy cities?

Just shrines (Patna counts as 2).

 

[Walliard]

Just shrines (Patna counts as 2).

"Just" shrines?

Anyway, if that's the case, the UHV text ought to be updated to match Persia's, since it's a bit misleading as it is.

 

[mushyman]

I think what Pacifist means is that you can have a city with multiple shrines, rather than needing three separate Holy Cities.

And Patna only counts as two in the 600AD start
In the 3000BC start it'll probably be Delhi, which is closer, but which probably won't have both shrines built.

 

[Walliard]

But the 600 AD start also has the pre-built Church of the Nativity in Jerusalem; does that count to the total? I'm guessing not, otherwise Rhye would've just made it the holy city.

 

[mushyman]

Yes, that should count.

 

[09camaro]

Church of the Nativity should be built in rome...

and while this has no relevance here, its always bothered me that the "Holy Temples" do not have a video of their own... they are world wonders after all. oh well.

 

[Moogi]

Hey, I've been having trouble playing the mod. My version of the game is vanilla for the Mac, patched at version 1.74. I have the mod's folder in the appropriate location, and none of the files are missing. The problem arises when I select 'Load a Mod' from the main menu. The game restarts as it should, but then, halfway through the loading, a notice appears on my screen saying 'Failed Loading XML file xml\text\civ4gametext_rfccivics.xml Error parsing XML file' It then says that the 'LoadXML call failed for xml\text\civ4gametext_rfccivics.xml. Current XML file is: xml\text\civ4gametext_dynamiccivnames_14spa.xml' at which point, the program closes. I looked in the XML files, and both of the files were in there. Have I done something wrong? If so, what can I do? My computer hasn't had any trouble with anything else involved here, so I doubt that it's a system error. Please help.

 

[aman2192]

Hey, I've been having trouble playing the mod. My version of the game is vanilla for the Mac, patched at version 1.74. I have the mod's folder in the appropriate location, and none of the files are missing. The problem arises when I select 'Load a Mod' from the main menu. The game restarts as it should, but then, halfway through the loading, a notice appears on my screen saying 'Failed Loading XML file xml\text\civ4gametext_rfccivics.xml Error parsing XML file' It then says that the 'LoadXML call failed for xml\text\civ4gametext_rfccivics.xml. Current XML file is: xml\text\civ4gametext_dynamiccivnames_14spa.xml' at which point, the program closes. I looked in the XML files, and both of the files were in there. Have I done something wrong? If so, what can I do? My computer hasn't had any trouble with anything else involved here, so I doubt that it's a system error. Please help.

I'm pretty sure any mod with a dll. won't work on a Mac... Sorry