civvver
Deity
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2007
- Messages
- 5,855
where I said he plays HC because of financial? i said since he sticks with HC who is accidentely financial he will use cottages... not sure why you reverse the logic of mine sentence.
I didn't say you did. I was making the point in a very round about way that financial is kinda irrelevant and hammer cities are better. In my view anyway. It was admittedly not a very well thought out posting by me.
A hammer economy with specialized cities isn't *that* complicated. I think a lot of players get hung up on trying to fit their economic strategy into a box like cottage economy, hammer economy, specialist economy, even heard people mention food economies. Really you need to look at each individual city and then what your empire needs. Like in the screenshot seraiel just posted washington could go all hammers with a granary + forge + barracks and be a HE epic. Or it could build wealth. Or spam settlers. Hammer cities are flexible.
Compared that to a city with some food on rivers. You could make it a cottage city and convert it to a hammer city later with watermills. Up to you, depending on how developed your cottages are by then and if you need more unit production or not.