1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Restrictions on Tribe Choices?

Discussion in 'Civ3 - Democracy and Team Games' started by Cyc, Oct 6, 2010.

?

Would you like to see these restrictions on the available Tribes?

Poll closed Oct 13, 2010.
  1. No Agricultural Tribes

    25.0%
  2. No Tribes who have a UU in the Ancient Age

    12.5%
  3. Both

    37.5%
  4. Neither

    25.0%
  5. ABSTAIN

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Bacon King

    Bacon King Chieftain

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2003
    Messages:
    1,091
    Location:
    New Orleans, LA
    Wow, this is moving a tad slowly. :p

    I've found my interest in Civ revived lately; I come to CFC for the first time in forever, think, "awesome, a new Civ III demogame thing is starting!" and my cursory glance here reveals it's been in the planning stage for ages. Ah, well, I suppose I'll join a team and hope this gets started soon.
     
  2. Cyc

    Cyc Looking for the door...

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    14,736
    Location:
    Behind you
    I remember you, BK. Welcome. :thumbsup:

    We are waiting for thr rules process to come to an end. It could be quite a while (as in a couple of weeks). I'll read your other posts now.
     
  3. CommandoBob

    CommandoBob AbstractArt

    Joined:
    May 18, 2005
    Messages:
    8,226
    Location:
    Too near The Temple of Jerry Jones
    :hmm:

    What if there were 4 Persias in the game?

    :trouble: or :run: or maybe both.
     
  4. Cyc

    Cyc Looking for the door...

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    14,736
    Location:
    Behind you
    :) It appears 4 Persian teams at once is an option. Kinda doubt it will happen, but it could. All team are supposedly getting their first choice. It could be Persian vs Persian.

    But let's not discuss Tribe choices in open forum. ;)
     
  5. Calis

    Calis on time

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    8,967
    Location:
    Germany GMT+1
    Horrible, just horrible.

    I hate to play with the same tribes. It just feels wrong to me! But that might just be me.
     
  6. justanick

    justanick Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2010
    Messages:
    736
    Location:
    Germany
    I ensure you, you are not the only one. :)
     
  7. Lanzelot

    Lanzelot Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,227
    Location:
    Heidelberg
    I completely agree as well. (Who by the way wanted that rule?! I originally suggested "first choice + second choice".)
     
  8. Cyc

    Cyc Looking for the door...

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    14,736
    Location:
    Behind you
    Well, I don't think Anyone wanted their second choice, Lanzelot. :D
     
  9. Lanzelot

    Lanzelot Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2007
    Messages:
    5,227
    Location:
    Heidelberg
    Actually our team had at least three very good choices, which would all be acceptable to us. (We couldn't make up our minds for a long time... quite a few swords got broken in two during the decision-finding-process... :D)
     
  10. Cyc

    Cyc Looking for the door...

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    14,736
    Location:
    Behind you
    Really, which teams won? :mischief:
     
  11. justanick

    justanick Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2010
    Messages:
    736
    Location:
    Germany
    :meld:
    Enforcing a second choice is even worse.
     

Share This Page