Rhye's of Civilization - the fastest loading mod Expanded

Rate this mod!

  • I can't play Civ without this: no more loading times!

    Votes: 203 66.6%
  • A good mod, but I won't play with it

    Votes: 54 17.7%
  • I don't like the map

    Votes: 13 4.3%
  • I don't like the terrain

    Votes: 9 3.0%
  • I don't like the additions

    Votes: 5 1.6%
  • I don't like the rules changes

    Votes: 21 6.9%

  • Total voters
    305
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm hoping the new civ isn't Poland or Israel, as has already been said, there just isn't enough space for them.

I don't mind one huge download. Long live ADSL!

ibcoltscrew said:
I agree cause Jesus was from Jerusalem and Jerusalem is in Israel. Our calendar is base on this guy ;) I think it's a important part of our world and religion.

This is probably a good reason to stick to talking about Rhye's mod and not politics or religion. This just cracks me up! :crazyeye: Iboltscrew, you're a Christian right? Never heard of Bethlehem (or at a stretch Nazareth) nor Sosigenes or the Julian Calendar? :lol:
 
Asclepius said:
I'm hoping the new civ isn't Poland or Israel, as has already been said, there just isn't enough space for them.

This just cracks me up! :crazyeye: Iboltscrew, you're a Christian right? Never heard of Bethlehem (or at a stretch Nazareth) nor Sosigenes or the Julian Calendar? :lol:
I'm nothing buddy, i don't have faith at all, i'm scientist and i only believe in myself. I strongly think i'm the only one woh really exist in this world. You guys are only in my head like everything else. Don't suppose something about me, you don't know me like i don't know you and it's better this way. I was saying that because the game is base on my calendar and my calendar is base on Jesus Christ.
There is nothing stupid about adding Israel even if i really don't like this country and this religion.
 
Asclepius said:
I'm hoping the new civ isn't Poland or Israel, as has already been said, there just isn't enough space for them.
There is plenty of space for Poland. Look at the screenshot. They easily have more space than any other European civ (except Russia.)
 

Attachments

  • poland.jpg
    poland.jpg
    84.6 KB · Views: 662
I have received a complaint: Civilopedia shows "Upgrades to" even with the unit is obsolete only and not upgradeable. So I'd change "Upgrades to" to a more generic "Obsolete with". Is the term "obsolete with Battleship" correct? Or is it "obsolete after Battleship"? Or "Rendered obsolete by Battleship" (maybe too long)
 
I have a solution for all! Add Poland which I agree with. We need them to enjoy wiping them out...IE GERMAN SMILES!...Remove sameria use them as Poland and give Babylon a starting extra city where Jerusalem is. Babylon Conquered Jersulem and it would make much sence and Im a christian...(Wish I was a better one or Im just not sure what a christian is anymore!)

Im going to maybe mode this myself for anyone who is interested.

tacfun
 
oh, it's the Dutch 18c Officer by Steph. You should find it in one of his collections.

Again, can anybody tell me the correct sentence?

Rhye said:
I have received a complaint: Civilopedia shows "Upgrades to" even with the unit is obsolete only and not upgradeable. So I'd change "Upgrades to" to a more generic "Obsolete with". Is the term "obsolete with Battleship" correct? Or is it "obsolete after Battleship"? Or "Rendered obsolete by Battleship" (maybe too long)
 
Try this on Monarch or harder level and tell me what you think. You can play on whatever level you like but I made it for Monarch level.

1. I gave some civs a bit of a head start.
2. I removed America
3. Babylon has Jerusalem
4. Greece has Sparta
5. Egypt has Cario
6. Ottomons have Troy
7. Russia has Warsaw

Don't worry I have tried to balance them so the civs with extra cities don't have settlers or workers at beginning. trying to make it work out a little more like history and give a more ancient feel. I put Cario instead of Memphis and Giza for later game play reasons. There are othere small changes too.

Please place the file where you placed the 2.49 Version and enjoy!!

tacfun :king:

Readme updated on this and next page of changes!!
 
File above was compressed as a .rar file and renamed as a .zip file if anyone has problems opening it!

tacfun
 
Rhye said:
I have received a complaint: Civilopedia shows "Upgrades to" even with the unit is obsolete only and not upgradeable. So I'd change "Upgrades to" to a more generic "Obsolete with". Is the term "obsolete with Battleship" correct? Or is it "obsolete after Battleship"? Or "Rendered obsolete by Battleship" (maybe too long)
"Obsolete with" works, but isn't the greatest. I think "rendered obsolete by" makes the most sense.
 
Yay! :goodjob: Thanks everyone! I just downloaded it, it seems to be working fine! Give me 24 hours to report back a poll vote!

SilverKnight :cool:
Elated! :D :D :D

P.S. Oh yeah, I agree with "rendered obsolete by." It sounds more elegant!
 
Jaguar said:
There is plenty of space for Poland. Look at the screenshot. They easily have more space than any other European civ (except Russia.)
There is also a lot of marsh and unsettleable (by the AI) forest between Berlin and Moscow. Most games see Germany and Austria with only three contiguous towns in traditional German and Austrian territory. Another civ starting in-between Russia, Austria and Germany would probably limit Germany, Austria and Poland to only one or two starting towns. I don't think that would make for very strong opponents. Just my 2 euro cents.
 
Actually they will start to battle or they tend to start to send settlers over towards China area...LOL...Really hate them when they do that!

On another note... Ive been testing my mod enchancement and its working really well. Wonders are being built almost 100% by the right Civs... Not perfect but alot more fun and like Greece took out Troy ..lol! Other cool things happened in game too.

Im also working on version 1.01 and its basically some city name changes and removing goody huts from the game. City name changes will do the following as they computer settles cities it will be placing names closer to historic or now-a-days cities. I think this is fun for when we enter modern times.(Not perfect but alot better!) Removing the goody huts will help will some civs getting an unfair advantage and I feel goody huts are unbalancing the game.

tacfun
 
Rhye...Could you possibly think of removing Goody-Huts from 2.50 or atleast have 1 version without them. I do believe the game plays better.

tacfun
 
Ok... Up above a couple of post I have updated to version 1.01 and this should be it. Unless I see a major game play tweak that needs being done.

Enjoy!!

tacfun

PS. I believe I have gotten all Goody-Huts off the map. I spent at least an hour takening them off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom