aelf
Ashen One
Left-liberals have always been derided for wanting safe spaces, but what about moderates and the right?
Right-wingers champion freedom of speech and are anti-PC culture, but when their views are criticised, they often raise a stink and are quick to accuse critics of trying to shut down discussion. Moderates claim that they champion rational and civil debate, but when called out for their patronising stance on speech and public discourse, they may resort to the mockery and insults that they said they reject.
So it kinda looks like everyone needs their own safe spaces. Do you think every side deserve safe spaces? Are safe spaces inherently wrong? Or is your safe space better than my safe space? What are the implications of having everyone safely cocooned within their own ideological bubbles, whether in the name of civil discourse or to save people from tears?
Please discuss.
Right-wingers champion freedom of speech and are anti-PC culture, but when their views are criticised, they often raise a stink and are quick to accuse critics of trying to shut down discussion. Moderates claim that they champion rational and civil debate, but when called out for their patronising stance on speech and public discourse, they may resort to the mockery and insults that they said they reject.
So it kinda looks like everyone needs their own safe spaces. Do you think every side deserve safe spaces? Are safe spaces inherently wrong? Or is your safe space better than my safe space? What are the implications of having everyone safely cocooned within their own ideological bubbles, whether in the name of civil discourse or to save people from tears?
Please discuss.