When I start a game it says, "Unable to allocate draw-buffer; terminating program", and yes, before anyone asks, I did uninstall civIII and installed it again.
3 questions:
1. Have ANY version of C3(C) worked on your machine?
2. Do you have the latest VIDEO drivers installed? Directx installed?
3. Do you have enough VIDEO MEMORY?
I'm far from expert but I seem to remember getting and error like that and either installing newer drivers, or replacing the video card with more mem.
The Armoured Cruiser is a generic Armoured Cruiser for all the civs that don't have specific Armoured Cruisers of their own (mainly the non-colonial nations). Also, in light of the Admiral Spaun obsoleting the Zenta PC, I would think that, despite its designation as a CL, the Spaun and Modified Spaun are intended to be the workhorse Cruisers of the Austro-Hungarian Kriegsmarine. One of the main reasons I'm thinking so is by comparing the Spaun to other CLs, particularly from Light Cruisers I - the only one that's really comparable is the Russian Boyarin, which has 10/6/7 ADM and 5 Bombard. In fact, looking at a high-end Armoured Cruiser (the German Scharnhorst class), I'm very sure - the Scharnhorst is 12/12/6 with 12 Bombard and 4 HP. Of course, the Scharn has twice the Def of the Spaun, but it's an Armoured Cruiser III ship. So, the Spaun seems to be intended to be the primary Cruiser of the A-H, and it's designation as "Light" is realistic, while its stats are intended to make sure the A-H aren't stuck with jack-all between its (rather good) Destroyers and (decent) BBs.tom2050 said:NOTE: The Armoured Cruiser (Armored Cruisers III, 2nd era), which I would think should be better than Austria-Hungary's Admiral Spaun Class CL (Light Cruiser I tech; 1st era), is actually worse in every conceivable way.
Civ3Conquests.exe from \Firaxis Games\Civilization III Complete\Conquests\Scenarios\AoI Deluxe v4.0
The values and stats of ships are based on many different factors of what the ships were in reality. So changing them would be unrealistic. Considering that the creators of this mod tried to make this scenario realistic ANd playable, it would be wrong (imo) to change anything in the scenario against their objectives. But one can do what one wants to improve scenarios for their own like. One just shouldn't state in the scenario thread that one has changed something in the scenario.
ChaosArbiter said:The Armoured Cruiser is a generic Armoured Cruiser for all the civs that don't have specific Armoured Cruisers of their own (mainly the non-colonial nations). Also, in light of the Admiral Spaun obsoleting the Zenta PC, I would think that, despite its designation as a CL, the Spaun and Modified Spaun are intended to be the workhorse Cruisers of the Austro-Hungarian Kriegsmarine. One of the main reasons I'm thinking so is by comparing the Spaun to other CLs, particularly from Light Cruisers I - the only one that's really comparable is the Russian Boyarin, which has 10/6/7 ADM and 5 Bombard. In fact, looking at a high-end Armoured Cruiser (the German Scharnhorst class), I'm very sure - the Scharnhorst is 12/12/6 with 12 Bombard and 4 HP. Of course, the Scharn has twice the Def of the Spaun, but it's an Armoured Cruiser III ship. So, the Spaun seems to be intended to be the primary Cruiser of the A-H, and it's designation as "Light" is realistic, while its stats are intended to make sure the A-H aren't stuck with jack-all between its (rather good) Destroyers and (decent) BBs.
Sorry guys, but you are gonna have to make a Age of Imperialism; 1895-1924, Deluxe Version for dummies, I can't find this file in AoI Deluxe v4.0, all I have in AoI Deluxe v4.0 is the scenario file.
I found two civ3conquests.exe in AoI Deluxe in the no raze patch but that's not where you said it was, did I not download the whole folder? or did you make a mistake when you wrote it? and before when I said I found it in search, well, it was an zipped file which when I extracted it replaced all my files in the conquests folder with other files so that was the problem.
Arexander said:I was just stating that I am against changing a scenario. I didn't say that you had done that. That's why I used 'one' in there. I was trying to make it to point anyone and everyone that I'm against changing.
I believe there is a misunderstandment somewhere. I am not very good at English so it is very hard for me to state what I try to. Mostly it goes well but sometimes things are misunderstood.
maidaniuc said:Okay the scenario still doesn't show up when I open civ-content!!!! I did everything i was supposed to and it even shows conquests on the front page, any ideas? and yes I did copy the scenario from AoI deluxe v4.0 into the scenarios folder. And thank you Virote_Considon because that cleared up some confusion.
Klyden said:As I have often mentioned in the past..
The written word can be the suck in terms of trying to convey emotion and intent.
It generally lacks the ability convey meaning as well as a face to face conversation could because there are other clues like body language and how it was said (vs what was said) that help the person hearing the message better understand the intent of the person giving the message.
I would assume the case can be made that it is especially difficult in a forum where many posters are not native English speakers.
..... Well TWO YEARS later and london fell ...........Then the very go after I take London, just when its possible to wipe the British of the map and walk to a vp victory, Russia declares war on Austria. Pat