mtgfreak
Massing Artillery
i can play any version necessary
I guess I just got tired of waitingmad-bax said:Hey Foul!! Ted Jackson. I was going to use that as a sponsored variant soon. Still will actually.(You heard it here first)
The more the merrier.mad-bax said:I can't advertise the game on the SGOTM Forum as it would be an abuse of privelidges, but I can certainly PM a few people who might make good playing partners.
Difficult decision MBmad-bax said:If I wasn't making the map I'd play the game.
Scout's talking about the weekend but don't rush it.mad-bax said:When do you want the map?
I think if we could get the map by this weekend that would be good. Is there a rule that we can't have three crews playing this? I'll put something in the first post that resembles a roster.mad-bax said:When do you want the map?
EDIT: You need to put the rosters in post one scout. And I think you are full. Congrats!!
scoutsout said:Roster A (Scout1A?) is now set, and edited into the first post. I will leave "Roster B" open for the moment, to see if we get enough players for a third crew.
@Mad-Bax: let's see ... parameters... I want more land visible than that C3C game Ainwood is currently previewing... :shakehead I want to play a tribe that doesn't have "builder" potential. No Religious or Scientific tribe. And it looks like this will be1.22f. Oh yeah - disable Scientific Great Leaders. This oughta get some people primed for COTMX... or should we call it COTF? (Conquest of the Fortnight? I digress...)
There's my $0.02.
@TedJackson, Brother Bede... any suggestions from you guys?
TedJackson said:My initial reaction is for an Archipelago map and a Seafaring Civ to maximise trading opportunities.
Personally, I lean toward England or Byzantium.
Ted