ShannonCT
Deity
As this is a new version, are there any "improvements" to AI behavior that may cause us grief?![]()
There are changes to AI behavior, but nothing regarding peace making.
As this is a new version, are there any "improvements" to AI behavior that may cause us grief?![]()
. . . . . . . . . . .gandhi is still ~20 turns from sending out a settler. If we wait for a chance to capture a settler heading south, we can probably pick up 2-3 workers when we really need them. If we start the war now, we probably can't get more than 1 worker why wouldn't we be able to pick off settlers just as in your scenario? and we would need to keep the war going for 30-40 turns to achieve the objective of keeping gandhi confined to the north. I was hoping for a quick war of 10-15 turns where we wouldn't give gandhi much time to organize a counterattack. playing the devil's advocate: If we can prevent ivory from being hooked up, not sure he'd be much of a threat with no advanced units and limited tiles improved.gandhi will talk 6 turns after being declared on and has the highest possible probability of making peace.
. . . . . . . . . . .
Could happen. Certainly a need to test what Gandhi is likely to do, but if ivory is not improved and there are no more than 2 longbows in either city right now, would think our longbows could get to good defensive tiles (and stifle the fast workers) before Gandhi would be willing to risk attack. Might work to double them on one good tile. Concerned about Gandhi's willingness to chop units, while our hands are somewhat tied.AI tend not to send settler parties toward enemy units. So I don't what our chances are of capturing a settler when we're already at war. Might be able to deal with this by stationing units on forest (ideally on opposite side of cities from direction we'd like settler to go) to see inside city, and then try to anticipate where settlers would go and put knight out of sight in that direction.
If we wait for a settler party heading south before we declare war, we'll have time to build some warrior MPs/fogbusters, then hook iron, then build some good counter units for pillaging. A stack of knight/pike/Xbow can pillage one tile per turn. The combination of those three units will be very hard for Gandhi to stop. That should certainly allow us to pillage at will, but more concerned with stopping settlements, and it means building multiple units. Also, would Gandhi put both a WE and a longbow with his new settlers?
If we send in a LB now, it could be killed in the open by another LB and put us in a bad spot.
Most interesting . . . lots of questions: Were you able to capture the first worker? Does the settler build get interrupted as well? When does the ivory get improved? Does our lb still get attacked if he has some defensive bonus? Will a lb paired with another lb or just an explorer get attacked in open terrain? Have you played far enough to find out where the settler is sent both in and out of war, and any info on Gandhi deciding to attack St. Pete?I tried some tests settling near Gandhi. I gave myself a Great Spy to spy bomb him, so I could see what he was building. That seems a clever and highly useful tactic.
Delhi builds LB, barracks, LB, worker. Bombay builds a settler (slowly at Pop2). Delhi's 2nd LB (6th overall) comes around T20-22. The first built LB will escort the worker, although sometimes the fast worker gets ahead of the LB. If I declare war around that time, Gandhi will interrupt the worker build and start building the best available unit in Delhi. If our LB is on open terrain, it will be attacked if Gandhi has 2 roaming LBs in the area.
Most interesting . . . lots of questions: Were you able to capture the first worker? Does the settler build get interrupted as well? When does the ivory get improved? Does our lb still get attacked if he has some defensive bonus? Will a lb paired with another lb or just an explorer get attacked in open terrain? Have you played far enough to find out where the settler is sent both in and out of war, and any info on Gandhi deciding to attack St. Pete?
These tests were on a new random map that didn't match the real map. So I rebuilt a map with matching terrain and got some different results:
[snip]
He popped a GA in Bombay and settled it there.
ShannonCT said:First settler went north to get iron (~T30 with 2 chopped forests) with longbow and elephant escort.
Second settler went south to get wheat (~T50) with pikeman escort.
He also captured a barb city with his elephant.
Around T55, Gandhi had 4 LBs, 1 cat, 1 elephant, 1 pike. He was building another elephant and researching Education.
ShannonCT said:In the test I did, there was one turn where Gandhi left two workers undefended on one of the silk forests. That is the only place where we would have a good chance to worker steal early. Why don't I move our LB toward that area. If we can catch the workers there, we could consider declaring war. Otherwise, we can wait for the settler that he'll probably send south around T50.
Wondering if our situation at T50, with Gandhi having hooked both ivory and iron, will be that good, unless we greatly distort our development. Right now we may have a greater advantage.In the test I did, there was one turn where Gandhi left two workers undefended on one of the silk forests. That is the only place where we would have a good chance to worker steal early. This is before they roaded to Bombay and hooked up the ivory? If undefended for only one turn, that implies that an Indian unit was on an adjacent tile. Would he attack our longbow (and two workers on a forest tile?) and possibly kill him and get both workers back? Odds on this low enough so we would not need to keep the explorer around to stand with our longbow? Fear Gandhi will not leave workers unprotected if our lb is threatening. If steal not available, could we then declare anyway and prevent workers from getting to ivory?Why don't I move our LB toward that area. If we can catch the workers there, we could consider declaring war. Otherwise, we can wait for the settler that he'll probably send south around T50.
Cactus Pete said:No guts, no glory, Fred. There are some aggressive players on the teams that have been beating us. Think we need to thoroughly explore this option
You have to do better than that. Surely the level of aggression had nothing to do with how we did in our recent SGOTMs. If anything we have been more aggressive than most - if not all - of the other teams.
What I am looking for is a coherent plan indicating how the war will play out, how many hammers we will have to divert to it and what the potential gain is.
This is before they roaded to Bombay and hooked up the ivory? If undefended for only one turn, that implies that an Indian unit was on an adjacent tile. Would he attack our longbow (and two workers on a forest tile?) and possibly kill him and get both workers back? Odds on this low enough so we would not need to keep the explorer around to stand with our longbow? Fear Gandhi will not leave workers unprotected if our lb is threatening. If steal not available, could we then declare anyway and prevent workers from getting to ivory?
Wondering if our situation at T50, with Gandhi having hooked both ivory and iron, will be that good, unless we greatly distort our development. Right now we may have a greater advantage.
How about if we head east to meet America and see what lies further east. Not sure I see what going north will get us, unless England has maps of the area to the west?