No, it's not necessarily that bad, I agree. Gifting CS scares me a bit, though. It's a pretty significant concession on the Lib path. He could just pop a quick GS and bulb Philo, too, since we're giving him the pre-reqs.
How significantly will it even delay?? As far as I can tell, my save (with mindless worker management) is only ca. 5t behind LC's previous guestimate with respect to settling pig and silver, with equivalent workers. After that, Moscow is going at 45-50hpt on settlers.Moscow would be a very strong city at size 9, the problem is growing that far would significantly delay our rex, so perhaps this should wait until we start our military buildup to take Paris?
No, it's not necessarily that bad, I agree. Gifting CS scares me a bit, though. It's a pretty significant concession on the Lib path. He could just pop a quick GS and bulb Philo, too, since we're giving him the pre-reqs.
@Mitchum,
Are you available to play the next TS or still on your trip?
That's traditionally called a "swap," and of course it's all right.I don't want to be skipped completely but I'd like to switch with the player after me.
The issue is acquiring Agri and, more importantly, Pottery on a useful schedule. The new situation with Gandhi changes things now in this respect. First thing is to figure out how we can get max value out of him in the next few turns.bbp, I agree with you on developing Moscow, as I described here. I think we should buid two more workers now, before the next settler, and those two would focus on irrigating the Moscow corn. I don't see it slowing anything down in terms of REX, because we won't focus on growing Moscow till the Rice is done and we've popped out a coulpe more settler anyway.
So, if you had zero maintenance, you'd just build workers and settlers from size one?Edit: That said, I think REX asap is critical. The sooner we create our cities, the sooner and longer they produce. In fact, the only reason NOT to REX asap in CIV is maintenance.
I just did the calc, and I think that COL was good for +2 Trade Relations until only Turn 68, unfortunately. There may be some discrepancy with real game, but I was previously getting very close (+/- 3% maybe) results with our test save. I'm getting that we need to gift an extra 78b on top of COL next turn (T76), and an additional 10bpt after that.
Moscow asap will allow us to expand faster beyond the next 2-3 cities (silver - pigs - maybe marble), which is where the speed will actually matter.
Well, the basic principle is to grow enough to work your resource tiles. That's where we're at, basically. Your save has you working a mine and building another. I'd rather focus on working the four resource tiles at Pigs, the silver and furs up north, and the gems tiles. The only reason I want to grow Moscow right now is to work rice when it finally resembles a resource tile (5f) and the silk tiles.Missed this:
So, if you had zero maintenance, you'd just build workers and settlers from size one?![]()
I'm not suggesting we don't expand fast. On the contrary, what I'm saying is that growing Moscow asap will allow us to expand faster beyond the next 2-3 cities (silver - pigs - maybe marble), which is where the speed will actually matter. Edit: my claim needs testing, ofc...
Depends how you define "worth it". A PH mine in Moscow is worth (4hpt)*1.5 = 6hpt under Bureau; 8hpt when building a settler; 10hpt when building TGL or MoM or anything using stone/marble.Well, the basic principle is to grow enough to work your resource tiles. That's where we're at, basically. Your save has you working a mine and building another. I'd rather focus on working the four resource tiles at Pigs, the silver and furs up north, and the gems tiles. The only reason I want to grow Moscow right now is to work rice when it finally resembles a resource tile (5f) and the silk tiles.
I'm not going to do the calcs but I highly doubt the mines are worth it right now, especially since Moscow is already starved for food.