Share your games!

Here's a game I played last night:
White: Nathan P.
Black: Marty
Location: Cadillacs (local nightclub)
Date: June 23, 2009
Result: 1-0 by surrender

Moves:
1. e4 e5
2. Bc4 Nf6
3. Qh5 Nxh5 - forgot about the knight
4. Nf3 Qg5?! - puts his queen into a fork, losing it the next turn
5. Nxg5 Bc5 - won the queen back
6. Bxf7+ Kd8 - up a pawn and eliminates opponent's ability to castle
7. Nc3 Nc6
8. 0-0 d6
9. d3 Nd4
10. a4 Nxc2 - back to even sides
11. Ra2 Rf8
12. Bxh5 g6 = eliminates a knight
13. Bd1 Bd7 1-0 by surrender

Comments and critique are welcome for this game. It's also nice to have a win OTB.
 
1.d4 e6 "Horwitz Defense" (I was surprised this has a name)
Oh of course it has a name, it's way playable and easily transposes to a bunch of solid openings, and I think 1. d4 e6 2. c4 f5 used to be a popular way to enter the Dutch Defense to avoid the Staunton Gambit. Besides, everything has a name nowadays... Meadow Hay opening for example (1. a4 I believe). :D

Now, there probably aren't too many unique lines but even those are relatively solid for a 'weird' opening (for example 1. d4 e6 2. c4 Bb4+).
 
Comments and critique are welcome for this game. It's also nice to have a win OTB.
I think you're missing a bunch of moves, or there are errors in the record. 3 Qe5 isn't possible for example.

Congrats on the win in any case. :)
 
I think you're missing a bunch of moves, or there are errors in the record. 3 Qe5 isn't possible for example.

Congrats on the win in any case. :)
I recorded it as I played it with him, and the board had coordinates on it, so I sure it is accurate. I'll double check it in my Tournament Chess program though.

Edit: I have checked the game, and fixed the errors in recording. Please check it again.
 
:lol: @ your game WhiteEagle

Why in the world did you play Qh5?
Forgot about the knight and was trying to win quick. I was hoping my opponent had not heard of the scholar's mate. I guess he had. :( But a win is a win (even if I don't get a rating boost on Chess.com as a result)! :D
 
f7-f5 is obviously where it goes, but even so this seems like a desperate gamble...
 
Just finished up a game in the Team Match against the Blunder Club...

game is here

We were even until Black's 7. ...Ng4 when I go up a piece nabbing the Knight for free with my Queen. However, he evens things up, and then gains an advantage, after playing 13. ...Nxc2.

He blunders with 18. ...Be6, and promptly loses his Queen to my Rook, and I'm up a pawn. However, at this point in the game, I'd much rather be playing his game than mine. My pawns on the queenside are sitting ducks, and I've got doubled pawns on the e file.

So I press my advantages: a pawn advance up the e file, and my Queen's superior mobility. I bring out the King to help defend as well.

After black's 34. ...Ke6 I have a choice: Defend my advanced center pawn and take out his advancing pawns with Kxa6; or eliminate his last kingside pawn, putting another check on him yet again, and simultaneously defending my last kingside pawns from his rook with Qxg4+. I was really worried about his rook prowling around down there, and I knew that if his King took my e pawn I could fork his King and Rook. So I went with the Queen move :D

After that, it was mostly a matter of not screwing up ;)
 
Here is a little trifle from QueenAlice where I play the typical Bishop sacrifice on h7.
This is a cautionary tale; French is a difficult opening. Always look out when your kingside is carmped.
3...Nc6 might look a bit odd, but it is playable. But the bishop has no business on b4 in this variation, and Black should strive for castling long with b6, Bb7 and Qd7.
He could have defended better, but as far as I analysed it White wins in all variations after 6.0-0?

Cribb - talisman77

1. e4 e6 2. d4 d5 3. Nc3 Nc6 4. e5 Bb4 5. Nf3 Nge7 6. Bd3 O-O 7. Bxh7+ Kxh7 8. Ng5+ Kg6 9. h4 Rh8 10. h5+ 1-0
 
I've been messing with agressive pawn push tactics a bit recently - lost some games on stupid blunders, but this game actually worked pretty nicely. I'm not sure a strat like this is viable at higher levels, but it was fun :)

link

I thinked black missed 27 Nxc7 but even then I enter the lategame a pawn up after Rxc7, RxR and Rb8+
 
f7-f5 is obviously where it goes, but even so this seems like a desperate gamble...
...and only now I see that the f-pawn would have then been taken en passant. No wonder I am getting creamed at CFC tourney, if this is how observant I really am. :wallbash:
 
I lost two games via checkmate to my friend Marty the other night. I forgot to take pen and paper, so I can't post the games here. I did win 2 games of pool against him though! :D Seems I'm getting better at that, while I contine to struggle with my chess game. Guess I'm not much of a logical type.:blush:
 
When you see a good move, look for a better one, right?

Well I was playing black, with the move, in this position:

chessfail.png


I had originally planned on playing Rxg1, and after Nxg1 or Rxg1 I'd probably been in a won endgame (though a pretty complicated and tricky one).

But then I was like "hey the only square the white queen can go to is f2, and if it goes there, I'll play Rg2 forking the Queen and checkmate, so why not take the knight first?

Uh, well, the answer is below. (Or you can try to figure it out yourself)

http://www.chess.com/echess/game.html?id=25006798

The kicker is that he offered me a draw (which I could have forced) on move 35...

On another note, I'll post my finished second round CFC tourney games with comments soon... I wanna hear what my opponents have to say about them...
 
Back
Top Bottom