rfcfanatic
Mercantilist
I'm not sure why you would move there to begin with. The results aren't important, what's important is why you chose to move to begin with. I believe the phrase is "analyze the process, not the results."
What was your rationale for moving onto that hill to begin with? You move away from really nice cottageable land with FPs, you lose a corn, you lose fresh water, you lose 1 turn, and you waste a forest if you settle on the southern of the two PHs. What were you trying to gain? 1 extra hammer in the city tile? Do you think that's worth losing everything i just mentioned?
By the southern PH do you mean that forested hill? Actually I intended to settle on the northern one of the two - the one with 2


* Faster 1st worker: 12 turns for production + 1 turn for movement = 13 turns, instead of 15 turns
* Riverside allows the construction of Levee
* Plains hill often indicates an area with good production. The starting spot seemed to have very poor production. I don't play well

But yes, blind move of a starting Settler is always stupid, as I now learned. Here's a screenshot to illustrate the movement path:
Spoiler screenshot :

The 2nd move was required because I ended up 1 tile away from the coast.