Wait a minute, isn't an epic game an ordinary one of the same type we've been playing in past DG's (i.e. not a conquest)?ravensfire said:[*] No experience in dealing with conquests
Bootstoots said:Wait a minute, isn't an epic game an ordinary one of the same type we've been playing in past DG's (i.e. not a conquest)?
If that is true, then I strongly support playing another epic, though perhaps with some self-imposed restrictions or an increased difficulty level. We need to make the game more difficult to make it uncertain whether or not we'll win, but the overall format is right, I feel.
Bootstoots said:That's what I thought. It appears that ravensfire's post opposes a Conquest (though perhaps I'm misreading it).
Bootstoots said:That's what I thought. It appears that ravensfire's post opposes a Conquest (though perhaps I'm misreading it).
Strider said:Nope, he copied one of my posts from another thread. Let's just say it didn't transfer all to well.
Epic is basicly a standard game with no variants.MeteorPunch said:I think the title "epic" is misleading...almost all variants, including 5CC fall under "epic." The thread does not specifically state what type of epic game this is.