TAM Scenarios

[Dionysius]

<purged.>

 

[Drtad]

I would make a scenario if someone would mod the civs for me, I am not exactly very good at that.

 

[thamis]

We can mod any civ in that you want in the scenario. Just let us know, give us the city list and leader name, and we'll do it.

You can just make the scenario and simply place civs that we'll replace with different names and cities.

 

[Drtad]

Okay, thanks Thamis. I would like to do the Fall of Assyria first, so here is what I will need.

Urartu: Leader Sarduri IV
cities: Tushpa, Musasir Erebuni, Toprakalle, Karmir Blur, Argishtinili, Sardurinili, Rusahinili, Aniastania

Assyria: leader: Ashur-ubalit
cities: Nineveh, Ashur, Nimrud, Dur-Sharrukin, Harran, Imgur-Enlil, Qulhu,

Cimmeria: not sure of anything

Judah: Leader:Josiah cities: Jerusalem, Beersheba
I think you guys have the Medes, Babylonians, Phoenicians and the Egyptians, so thats it, o yeah, do you guys have a map that I could use?

 

[thamis]

There are a few good maps out there that fit the location. We are also shipping a huge Fertile Crescent map, but that may be too big.

Are you intending to use pre-placed cities? Then we won't even have to mod stuff into the game. The city lists are a bit too short for a fully-fledged civ, you know? If you pre-place cities, then we can do it all in the WBS.

 

[Drtad]

Yes, I am planning to pre-place cities. I could do it all in the WBS, but it be be better if I had custom unique units for the extra civs instead of borrowing other ones from existing civs. If I did some more research I could find better city lists. And one more thing, until TAM is Warlords compatible, I do not want to start because I plan to make use of the vassals feature. The fertile crescent map would be good.

 

[AndreasS]

Any more plans of a Rise of Rome scenario, after the terrible on in Warlords? One that covers the whole period, with whole of Europe, North-Africa and the Middle-East would be awesome, not just the Punic Wars.......

 

[Drtad]

Yes I agree, the one in warlords was one of the worst scenarios I have ever seen.

 

[AndreasS]

Yes I agree, the one in warlords was one of the worst scenarios I have ever seen.

Yeah! The tech tree is totally uninteresting, the epic feel of it is non existant with only 200 turns, the builder options are far too few, there is too few units to choose from, and they should have made it on a grander scale, with at least a couple of more nations to play, important nations for that period. I would love a more TAM like Rise of Rome, My God, It would be awesome!

Why didnt they hire the TAM team to make Rise of Rome? That would be a sucsess!

 

[Dionysius]

<purged.>

 

[Drtad]

Hmm. Their are some innaccuracies in that map. First, Assyria never took the Urartian capital Tushpa. They said that the Urartian cavalry was too strong for them to beat and they avoided the Lake Van area. At 824 BC, Urartu was actually becoming the strongest power in the region. It was in 714 when the Cimmerians came that they started to decline. Good map though, lots of cities on it.

 

[Dionysius]

<purged.>

 

[Dionysius]

<purged.>

 

[Drtad]

It would be nice to have that map, but the fertile crescent will do.

 

[Dionysius]

<purged.>

 

[Drtad]

Excellent! You are a superb map-maker Dionysius! Once TAM is compatible with warlords I will start making the Assyria scenario.

 

[Dionysius]

<purged.>

 

[AndreasS]

Congratulations Dionysius! That one look really great!

 

[thamis]

Dionysius, can you clean up that map, as I outlined in the two tutorials in my signature? I can do it myself, of course, but right now I'm quite busy writing up my MA thesis.

 

[thamis]

Never mind. I've done it, cleaned it, changed the civilizations in the map (why were the Germanic Tribes, Carthage, and Iberia in there?) and uploaded it here:

http://forums.civfanatics.com/downloads.php?do=file&id=2174