Term 1 - Nominations for Judge Advocate

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that there is no guarantee for anonymity.
Someone will hang the accuser out. So no need to offer a service no one can deliver on.
 
I think there should be anonymity. If there isn't, then there is the risk that the personal identity will affect the procedurs of justice. It's the same reason we have the secret ballot. Though, of course, we need someone to keep an eye over the JA to make sure they do their job.
 
Well, I think varying maturity levels in the judiciary will impact the willingness to keep this secret. Also, all the innuendos and so on will always make someone suspected and so on, so even people not calling for the trial would be subjected to a Witchhunt.

We see the same problem in real life. Some principle driven dreamy idealists want to impose laws the police cannot enforce. I do not want such laws, or such shaky principles to be kept as an illusion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom