ratrangerm
Prince
I've been experimenting with games on the Prince level... haven't actually finished one yet, but I've been trying out various schemes and ideas in the early game, just getting the feel for what I'll be up against.
But while I have been doing this, I've been kicking around an idea for an interesting challenge... and maybe, just maybe, I'll give it a go at Prince level.
The idea is this: I play Vanilla CIV (don't have Warlords) on standard continents at normal speed, but pre-select my opponents. The catch is this: Every opponent I select must have the aggressive trait, meaning I'll have to deal with six opponents who are prone to warmongering.
The lineup would thus include Alexander, Montezuma, Huayna Capac, Tokugawa, Napoleon, and either Genghis Khan or Kublai Khan (I may just flip a coin to decide which Mongol leader will be selected).
The question to be asked is this... which civ should I pick to take on the warmongering opponents? Some ideas I have:
* Caesar: They say this guy is a pretty good choice for those just starting on Prince level... only thing is, you better make sure your Praetorians aren't running into Axemen.
* Catherine: I like the combination of Creative and Financial, and Cossacks are very good for waging war. But I've played several games with Catherine, so it might be worth trying a different civ.
* Gandhi or Saladin: Could be possible to use one of these leaders to pursue an early religion, then try to spread it. Of course, certain warmongering folks (Monty, Capac) won't shy away from chasing religions.
Or I could be even more daring... the AI leaders are assigned, but mine is random. Just how much of a glutton for punishment could I be?
So I ask all of you these questions:
1. Which leader should I pick, or do I select "random" and take my chances?
2. What would be the ideal strategy to pursue with every opponent a warmongerer? Pursue an early religion, play the diplomacy game, early rush at least one opponent while trying to make nice with another?
3. Should I go with the mindset that I'll pursue a peaceful victory? Could be even more satisfying if it happens against a bunch of guys who are prone to war to settle their differences first (although Capac is no slouch when it comes to teching, and I've noticed Alex and Nappy can sometimes make strides in that area).
But while I have been doing this, I've been kicking around an idea for an interesting challenge... and maybe, just maybe, I'll give it a go at Prince level.
The idea is this: I play Vanilla CIV (don't have Warlords) on standard continents at normal speed, but pre-select my opponents. The catch is this: Every opponent I select must have the aggressive trait, meaning I'll have to deal with six opponents who are prone to warmongering.
The lineup would thus include Alexander, Montezuma, Huayna Capac, Tokugawa, Napoleon, and either Genghis Khan or Kublai Khan (I may just flip a coin to decide which Mongol leader will be selected).
The question to be asked is this... which civ should I pick to take on the warmongering opponents? Some ideas I have:
* Caesar: They say this guy is a pretty good choice for those just starting on Prince level... only thing is, you better make sure your Praetorians aren't running into Axemen.
* Catherine: I like the combination of Creative and Financial, and Cossacks are very good for waging war. But I've played several games with Catherine, so it might be worth trying a different civ.
* Gandhi or Saladin: Could be possible to use one of these leaders to pursue an early religion, then try to spread it. Of course, certain warmongering folks (Monty, Capac) won't shy away from chasing religions.
Or I could be even more daring... the AI leaders are assigned, but mine is random. Just how much of a glutton for punishment could I be?

So I ask all of you these questions:
1. Which leader should I pick, or do I select "random" and take my chances?
2. What would be the ideal strategy to pursue with every opponent a warmongerer? Pursue an early religion, play the diplomacy game, early rush at least one opponent while trying to make nice with another?
3. Should I go with the mindset that I'll pursue a peaceful victory? Could be even more satisfying if it happens against a bunch of guys who are prone to war to settle their differences first (although Capac is no slouch when it comes to teching, and I've noticed Alex and Nappy can sometimes make strides in that area).