SamSniped
DJ Goodboye
That's a great idea IMO. More rounds=quicker Arena games=more Arena games=??????=profit 

The game would certainly go quicker if you had, say, up to 3 simultaneous Arena rings.
It would be more like watching professional sports--generally, on any given evening/Sunday, you can find multiple teams facing off.
So, a voter could list up to three bolded names.
I actually was planning on somehing like this:You know what, this isn't a bad idea. I'll go with your suggestion of three - seems like a good number - until we get down to the final eight, then cut it down to two games per round, until there are only three left.
Once the list is filled, we can begin.
I actually was planning on somehing like this:
-20 Players
-10 Matches at once, each lasts three days.
-Everyone will face everyone at some point, leading to 19 total matches each.
-The top 16 players advance to a seeded bracket.
-An elimination tournament follows until a winner is determined.
I'd actually like to see the Arena III be the same as its predecessors with mine being seperate. But hey, it's your game, run it as you want...
I'll consider it. I was thinking of just calling it "The Games", but I'm open to title suggestions.@Sparthage: Can I suggest your game be called Tournament?