The Conscientious Empire: A Peaceful Builder Challenge

. . . . I am talking about REAL Mercs. They should be powerful having, say an extra HP and extra attack and defense, For a Price
I wouldn't even care if Mercs were a special unit. I'd just like to be able to buy, sell & give away military units. For example, if I made an MA with a weaker neighbor of my enemy, I could supply my ally with some cavs to help prop them up.
 
I wouldn't even care if Mercs were a special unit. I'd just like to be able to buy, sell & give away military units. For example, if I made an MA with a weaker neighbor of my enemy, I could supply my ally with some cavs to help prop them up.

Hmmm, I think that you might be able to do that if you play with the editor a bit. I will do some looking at it and get back to you on that one. For a civilization that has the ability to enslave units, that might work fairly easily, have to look at the rest.

Snarkhunter, I like your idea of the condottierri, but that would take some work on the source code. Have to include the possibility of them when flipping, taking a city with them. Plenty of discussion of the fun of having mercenaries in Oman's Art of War in the Middle Ages, and Age of War in the 16th Century, and also Machiavelli.

And the classic quote from him: "Gold with not always get you good mercenaries, but good mercenaries can always get you gold."
 
Snarkhunter, I like your idea of the condottierri, but that would take some work on the source code. Have to include the possibility of them when flipping, taking a city with them. Plenty of discussion of the fun of having mercenaries in Oman's Art of War in the Middle Ages, and Age of War in the 16th Century, and also Machiavelli.

And the classic quote from him: "Gold with not always get you good mercenaries, but good mercenaries can always get you gold."

Ah yes, Niccolo is always good for a zinger or two :)

As long as we are fantasizing about mercs, we have to allow for the possibility of them becoming unemployed & then pillaging the entire landscape, a la the routiers in the 100 Years' set-to. Sort of super barbarians--there are parts of France that are claimed still haven't recovered from that treatment. . . .

Edit: Which means the Conscientious Builder can't use them, I guess (-:

kk
 
Oh, I don't know... I kind of like the idea of hiring professional soldiers to fight a (justified) war rather than sending my own people off to fight and die.

Along those lines, I think using mercenaries should decrease war weariness.

Depends. The 100 Years' & 30 Years' Wars, & for that matter, the Revolution (remember those pesky Hessians being quartered willy nilly everywhere? :) ) stand as eloquent contradictions. The problems start when mercs decide to go into business for themselves, not their employers. OTOH, if the mercs stay bought--and you aren't visiting them on your own people--then you are probably right, especially if it means avoiding conscription.

Side note: for fun, I revisited one of my early Warlord games (& was appalled at how bad the position was at about 100 turns--how did I ever win that dog the first time?). The Aztecs block my access to everything & after dealing with them & their push for Lebensraum, I'm ready to declare any war against them, at any time, a Just War :lol: There just aren't too many pushier AI's in the game, IMHO.

kk
 
The Aztecs block my access to everything & after dealing with them & their push for Lebensraum, I'm ready to declare any war against them, at any time, a Just War :lol: There just aren't too many pushier AI's in the game, IMHO.

Persia and the Greeks come to mind, they both seem to be real jerks when it it comes to trading and making demands. Sure, I'll trade Alphabet, Masory and 20 gold for Ceremonial Burial.... Not! And I'll give you Niagara Falls and Code of Laws when you demand, also. When pigs fly over the frozen lakes of hell!
 
Persia and the Greeks come to mind, they both seem to be real jerks when it it comes to trading and making demands. Sure, I'll trade Alphabet, Masory and 20 gold for Ceremonial Burial.... Not! And I'll give you Niagara Falls and Code of Laws when you demand, also. When pigs fly over the frozen lakes of hell!

I think this comes about because Persia and the Greeks both have kickin' UUs that tend to give them a military advantage at the height of the Ancient Age. The AI has a lot more bluster when it has a military advantage, or at least parity. Both Greece and Persia tend to chill out a bit when their UUs are past their prime, in my experience (at least, if they are still around at all :evil:).
 
Depends. The 100 Years' & 30 Years' Wars, & for that matter, the Revolution (remember those pesky Hessians being quartered willy nilly everywhere? :) ) stand as eloquent contradictions. The problems start when mercs decide to go into business for themselves, not their employers. OTOH, if the mercs stay bought--and you aren't visiting them on your own people--then you are probably right, especially if it means avoiding conscription.

Yes, mercenaries should be a double-edged sword. They should reduce WW when fighting in foreign lands, but cause trouble when garrisoned too long in your own civ’s barracks.

For that to work, you couldn’t be able to disband them. After the war, you’re stuck with them until you can sell them to someone else.

There could be a special wonder created to produce them, or they could be a cheap optional build from the military academy.

Side note: for fun, I revisited one of my early Warlord games (& was appalled at how bad the position was at about 100 turns--how did I ever win that dog the first time?). The Aztecs block my access to everything & after dealing with them & their push for Lebensraum, I'm ready to declare any war against them, at any time, a Just War :lol: There just aren't too many pushier AI's in the game, IMHO.


This is a gray area open to individual (and circumstantial) interpretation, but at the least I could condone starting a war to reclaim cities conquered by an aggressive neighbor.

Persia and the Greeks come to mind, they both seem to be real jerks when it it comes to trading and making demands.

The Aztecs and Persians particularly have been thorns in my side, but I do remember a game with the Greeks in which Al kept condescendingly referring to us as “the tiny nation of India.” (I had the last laugh, though.)

Demigod quest

My strategy for taking the CE to demigod level has centered on building the Great Library. My first attempts alternated between the Byzantines and the Koreans because I wanted a scientific civ that started with alphabet and had a mid-game UU. I’ve been playing right down the middle – continents, 70% water, normal, temperate, 4 billion years, roaming barbs, random opponents and all victory conditions enabled (except wonder).

When I got bored with those civs, I dropped the scientific requirement. I tried the Vikings and the Romans, but I finally got my DG win – a spaceship victory no less – with the Portuguese! :eek:

I got a very isolated start up in the northwest corner of the map, which allowed me to build a modest empire with little resistance. The expansionist and seafaring traits helped me make contacts quickly. I had a couple of luxuries including extras to trade, and got lucky with resources all the way up to the modern age.

The Inca declared an early war on me, allowing me to take the city they had built on my land, but I was at peace from the Medieval Age onward. My GA was started by a privateer attack.

Still, the Byzantines beat me to the modern age by quite a bit, and I could see they already had (at least) rocketry and computers when I got there. We finished fission on the same turn, but a hefty pre-build ensured that I got the U.N. first. I started planning to try for a diplomatic victory.

I researched nuclear power (they, it turned out, went for ecology), and when I traded NP to Theodora for rocketry, I found that they already had spaceflight.

But they had no aluminum.

I was able to find some aluminum and uranium in areas opened up by warfare, and, long story short, I beat them to the launch pad.
 
:goodjob: D.N !

That game was played as the Conscientious Empire?
 
Congratulations, D.N., on an outstanding win. Fortune, and the resource generator favored the good this time.
 
Am I the only one who thinks this is pretty stupid?
Really, I've never ran out of whales or Ivory, so I guess there's enough. I've ran out of oil... but it appeared somewhere else, so it was ok.
.centres...

No, you're not the only one. It's funny that you mention oil, because misguided individuals like the one who started this thread are the reason we're paying $4 a gallon gas.

I came in here looking for some builder tips I might not know & I wind up with some communist changing the game around with some kind of real world values he holds. If I want some left wing crap spoon fed to me then I will turn on the nightly news.

If I want to make the game harder I'll go up a level, plenty of challenge there.

Moderator Action: Threadjacking & trolling - warned.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
Death_Machine and others,

You can have your opinions, but I simply don't see any need to speak so rudely or turn this into a discussion about poliitics or values. Pacem plays HIS games that way and shares his perspective. He can have his opinion too.

Regarding builder tips you might want to check here http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=122419 and here
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=281173

Doug, that's all fine & good except the double standard you are using. You accept the premise that he can say what he wants while posting your displeasure about me doing the same thing. Get it?

Don't get your panties in a bunch just because I expressed my opinion just like he did. I never once said or implied that he should not feel free to express his opinion. I simply disagreed with it.
 
No double standard here... he started the thread you didn't. You can post a separate thread of your own if you like.
 
I came in here looking for some builder tips I might not know & I wind up with some communist changing the game around with some kind of real world values he holds. If I want some left wing crap spoon fed to me then I will turn on the nightly news.

I'm not out to spoon-feed anyone anything. I apologize if the title of the thread misled you.
 
No double standard here... he started the thread you didn't. You can post a separate thread of your own if you like.

Or I could just blow you off, make a mental note that you're a tool post where I want. Yes, I believe that is what I will do.
 
I'm not out to spoon-feed anyone anything. I apologize if the title of the thread misled you.

It's all good dude. No worries. The title made sense, my mind was just going down a different path. What I like about forums is that we can all express what we want. :cool:
 
Top Bottom