The End of the War on Terror

This question is primarily targeted to the Bush-fans. That is:

How do you know when we've won the war on terror?

Incredibly simple question to answer: When we (the USA) say it is over.

We did not start this. A group of individuals who usurped a right reserved for sovereign nations, the right to attack and declare war on a foreign power, attacked the United States. Since this group of people don't actually have the right to wage war against a foreign power, there is nobody on 'the other side' with which to negotiate a peace. Therefore, when and only when we, the attacked, deem the war on terror to be over will it be over. Nobody else has any business even remotely sticking their nose into this decision. No nation has any business negotiating on behalf of the group that usurped a right they have no claim to, else they are aiding the terrorists.
 
When our government says it is over.

Whoops. I went back to read the entire thread after posting my answer, and didn't realize it was a ressurrected year-old thread which I already answered last March. Nice to know I'm consistent, eh?
 
That's a complete lie. There have been many terrorist acts, particularly before this whole "9/11 hysteria" that were perpetrated by non-Muslims. People, especially some of those in power, simply want to paint the problem as an "Islamic one" so that people have a direction at which they can direct their anger. Terrorism would be a lot less unnerving to the masses if it wasn't accompanied by the image of dark haired, long bearded, sword-wielding Arabs about to behead some so-called "infidel".

If you argued that only Muslim terrorists should be pursued and terrorists espousing all other ideologies should be ignored, no one would take you seriously.

I'm simply saying there was no "war on terror" until 9/11, man we used terror to defeat the Japanese.... and no one gives a hoot, we did it cause we had to, and we'd do it again. That's why I don't even remotely buy into that we suddenly started a war to stop the "terror" tactics we practically pioneered. You don't see CNN specials about Irish terrorist being rooted out by our troops do you? Or chechen terrorists? Not unless there Muslim that is....

Muslims aren't angry at the West because its Christian, many simply think that they are pursuing the wrong policy. Recently while watching BBC news, I heard that British troops admitted that on average, at least 2 innocent Afghans are killed daily in the country by NATO troops. When we look at Iraq, the situation is even graver, and the ensuing refugee crisis is quickly becoming the world's worst. Such a level of sectarian violence is well beyond anything experienced by Muslim countries in modern times, and although the US and the West are not totally to blame, they have created an environment in Iraq where groups such as Al-Qaeda could spark such conflict.
Thats war man, its not like british troops go out and behead afghans with swords, there collateral damage casualties, nothing more.

I highly doubt the iraq "refugee crisis" as you put it is anything even remotely comparable to the crisis in sudan, but thats besides the point....

I simply see the USA as having brought to the forefront a movement which has ALREADY been in the making. Terrorists and islamic insurgents don't just pop out of the ground, they come from surrounding nations, and why would those happy, healthy, peace-loving muslim liberals suddenly turn into vicious suicide terrorists, death squads, etc? Well because they have been taught since childhood to hate the west, Christianity and especially the USA as the most visible appendage, this is there chance to do what they have been wanting to do there whole lives. To openly wage war on us.

This is an extremely disturbing comment, if I've understood it as I should have (forgive me if I haven't). You're basically arguing that politicians are painting this as a "war on terrorism" when it should be construed as a "clash of civilizations." That Muslims and the West are two completely different and competing groups and that as many as hundreds of millions of Muslims support terrorism. This is totally laughable and the last thing that should be done is demonizing a whole religious group for the actions of a small minority.
I think that would be obvious based on historical context, western christian civilization and middleast islamic civilization have been clashing in one form or another since islam became a prominent religion, sometimes the conflict has died down, at other times it has flaired up again, its never ended though. Thankfully space and mobility served to break everything up, however modern technology (especially in the communications area with the internet, and in the military are with long range missiles technology) has disturbed the original way in which this conflict tended to resolve itself more locally, it remains to be seen how all this will play out, but if muslims in nations like syria and iran stay the way they are now, it won't be pretty.

And I'm not demonizing the "whole" religious group, in fact I'm actually siding with one of them, the moderate muslims (like almost all who live in western nations) I consider to be a different group than the extremists, I'm simply saying that there is in the area of 1.2 billion muslims on earth today, and there numbers are currently growing fast (almost entirely through high birth rates in the developing world) now if even 1% are extremists thats still 12 million, heck even 0.1% is still the size of the whole population of my city. And I'm sure there are many more than that at this current time.

Instead what's required is a better understanding and appreciation for Islam. This is why the 9/11 attacks propelled the Qur'an to become the best selling book in America. People wanted to learn about Islam and to better understand a part of the world that they had largely ignored. Conversions in the US and other parts of the world also rose sharply following these attacks, because people were much better informed about the religion and some decided to embrace it.

I already have an understanding of islam, appreciation for any religion other than my own is a little beyond me as I see them all as false and leading men to hell, but I can still understand the concepts and why people believe as they do.

If I was really going to read crazy stuff into you post I'd say you thought the 9/11 attack were used by the Islamic God to bring more people to him, Whatever, whether some people decide they don't wanna eat pork and need to pray towards the east is nothing to me. What is something to me is when my christian brothers are persecuted, when women are abused, when children are trained to hate people they have never seen, for reasons that make no sense and when people fly airplanes into building full of people or preach open destruction of our allies (like the state of israel). Honestly the fact that islamic nations in the middle east are essentially trying to push israel off the map is enough to make them our enemies, we should defend our allies to the absolute death by whatever means necessary.

Honestly I'll get right to the point, I did not say that an open major civilization clash was actually occuring right at this moment. When it does you will know because there will be lots of shooting. However I'm saying that, the war on "terror" is mislabelled to cultivate political correctness. It should simply be called the war on radical islamic groups.

Of course we know how many muslims all over the world would cry bloody murder and start blowing stuff up if we started doing that, and that is basically my point. Muslims can scream and moan, they can say they hate us, they can say they are going to destroy Israel, the USA, the West, and everything we hold dear, they can preach there radical views from there mosques all over the free world. But still many people won't take them seriously. See the Jews learned there lesson. They learned if someone says there going to wipe you out, no matter how incapable they may look early on, believe them. And get ready. Trying not to offend muslims by calling it a war on "terror" is not helping.

I'm not saying all muslims are evil "terrorists" I"m not saying most are. I'm saying there are many who are, and the so called "moderates" especially over there, feel a lot more sympathetic to them than a lot of people realize.
 
I simply see the USA as having brought to the forefront a movement which has ALREADY been in the making. Terrorists and islamic insurgents don't just pop out of the ground, they come from surrounding nations, and why would those happy, healthy, peace-loving muslim liberals suddenly turn into vicious suicide terrorists, death squads, etc? Well because they have been taught since childhood to hate the west, Christianity and especially the USA as the most visible appendage, this is there chance to do what they have been wanting to do there whole lives. To openly wage war on us.

Were you radicalised by the sight of 9/11 (people you associate with - Americans - being murdered and terrorised by people you don't associate with - muslim extremists)?

I'm willing to bet you were.

So don't you think it at least possible that many of those radicalised muslims have become radicalised by the sight of people they associate with (muslims in Iraq, Afghanistan or Palestine) being killed, injured or mistreated by those they don't associate with (westerners)?

You could turn your whole polemic around, replace muslim extremist with 'crusader american' or 'zionist jew' and it would make just as much sense to many muslims then as it does to you as it now stands.

The War on Terror was a convenience for the neo-con expansionists to get people on side and keep the libertarians and liberals in their boxes while they pursued their regime-change agenda - if they coud have organised a piss-up in a brewery properly they might even have got away with it....

The War on Terror is over when a different administration decides the concept is no longer convenient for keeping us sheeple in line.
 
It will end when the War on Drugs and Other Assorted Nouns ends.
 
I'm simply saying there was no "war on terror" until 9/11, man we used terror to defeat the Japanese.... and no one gives a hoot, we did it cause we had to, and we'd do it again. That's why I don't even remotely buy into that we suddenly started a war to stop the "terror" tactics we practically pioneered. You don't see CNN specials about Irish terrorist being rooted out by our troops do you? Or chechen terrorists? Not unless there Muslim that is....

Fair enough, this clarifies your argument and I see what you meant now. Although I think you're simplifying things a bit too much (ie: the Basque group ETA has long been called a terrorist organization), in general you're correct about the media and the general connection people make between terrorism and Muslim perpetrators.

Thats war man, its not like british troops go out and behead afghans with swords, there collateral damage casualties, nothing more.

First of all, they are not always "collateral damage casualties." At times, people are killed because of mistakes on the part of occupying forces, avoidable mistakes. At other times, people are killed by abuse, rape, or other despicable acts.

You have to ask yourself, how many lives lost in "collateral damage casualties" is too many? Do you value an Afghani or Iraqi life as much as you do a British or American (Christian) life? If 100-200 innocent people are dieing in Iraq and Afghanistan daily, would you be reacting the same way if they were American/Coalition soldiers or Western civilians instead? --- I doubt it immensely.

I highly doubt the iraq "refugee crisis" as you put it is anything even remotely comparable to the crisis in sudan, but thats besides the point....

Then you're simply not following the Iraq war closely enough, and that is NOT besides the point. War and occupation have consequences, you can't simply ignore them and say that they're "besides the point." Here is just one example of the many articles about the growing crisis.

Asia Times said:
Nowhere on Earth is there a worse refugee crisis than in Iraq today. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, some 2 million Iraqis have fled their country and are now scattered across everywhere from Jordan, Syria, Turkey and Iran to London and Paris. (Almost none have made it to the United States, which has done nothing to address the refugee crisis it created.)

Another 1.9 million are estimated to be internally displaced persons, driven from their homes and neighborhoods by the US occupation and the vicious civil war it has sparked. Add those figures up - and they're getting worse by the day - and you have close to 16% of the Iraqi population uprooted. Add the dead to the displaced, and that figure rises to nearly one in five Iraqis.

I simply see the USA as having brought to the forefront a movement which has ALREADY been in the making. Terrorists and islamic insurgents don't just pop out of the ground, they come from surrounding nations, and why would those happy, healthy, peace-loving muslim liberals suddenly turn into vicious suicide terrorists, death squads, etc? Well because they have been taught since childhood to hate the west, Christianity and especially the USA as the most visible appendage, this is there chance to do what they have been wanting to do there whole lives. To openly wage war on us.

First of all, it is not disputed that the majority of the conflict going on in Iraq is internal, it's not the work of "foreign forces" as you're describing. Angry, indoctrinated people flooding in from all over the Muslim world just to get some shots off at Christians.

Many of these people are engaged in insurgency and have developed militias because the American/British policies in Iraq have not been working, and they're an occupying force.

You argue that these people have been taught since childhood to hate Christianity, and this is simply a ridiculous proposition. Why would Muslims go to all the trouble of attacking the US and the West if they want to go after Christians? 1 million Christians live in Iraq (at least... they used to, who knows how many have stayed thanks to the war and occupation.) Millions of Christians live in Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and other nearby countries. Why not just make the trip there to kill a few Christians, if as argued, that's what they've been brought up to believe.

Unlike what you describe, the reality is quite different. There has been intermarriage between Christians and Muslims, and the fact that these Christian minorities (and Jewish minorities, until the creation of Israel) exist in Muslim countries almost 1400 years after the initial spread of Islam is a strong rebuke of what you're saying.

I think that would be obvious based on historical context, western christian civilization and middleast islamic civilization have been clashing in one form or another since islam became a prominent religion, sometimes the conflict has died down, at other times it has flaired up again, its never ended though. Thankfully space and mobility served to break everything up, however modern technology (especially in the communications area with the internet, and in the military are with long range missiles technology) has disturbed the original way in which this conflict tended to resolve itself more locally, it remains to be seen how all this will play out...

I agree with you that there have been ebbs and flows in the animosity and conflict between Christian and Muslim nations/empires throughout history. I do have a problem with your second point though.

but if muslims in nations like syria and iran stay the way they are now, it won't be pretty.

What on earth do you mean? "If muslims stay the way they are now." You have to understand that, especially in Syria (and other countries, such as Egypt, Saddam's Iraq, Libya, etc.) dictatorships or one party systems are accepted and propped up by the US, as long as they serve American interests. As soon as they tug too hard on the leash though, they become demonized as long-standing enemies. You talk about the Muslims in these countries, but many people, for instance the young 20-30 somethings in Iran are (or at least were) very pro American until Bush's administration and its most recent policies. Calling Iran a member of the "Axis of Evil" certainly hasn't improved perceptions of the US among Iranians, and has just given critics of the US more to use in their arguments. Iran has a very young population. For instance, more than 25% are under 14 years old.

And I'm not demonizing the "whole" religious group, in fact I'm actually siding with one of them, the moderate muslims (like almost all who live in western nations) I consider to be a different group than the extremists, I'm simply saying that there is in the area of 1.2 billion muslims on earth today, and there numbers are currently growing fast (almost entirely through high birth rates in the developing world) now if even 1% are extremists thats still 12 million, heck even 0.1% is still the size of the whole population of my city. And I'm sure there are many more than that at this current time.

So how many hard line Christians like you do you think there are in the world? Didn't Jesus say, according to your bible, that if a person strikes you on one cheek, that you should offer them another cheek? How do you reconcile that with your comments about the need to "fight back."

I already have an understanding of islam, appreciation for any religion other than my own is a little beyond me as I see them all as false and leading men to hell, but I can still understand the concepts and why people believe as they do.

If you're a Christian, what on earth in Christianity convinces you about its Truth versus any other religion's? If you want to get an idea about some of the reasons Muslims are so convinced about their faith, take a look at this website:

Miracles of the Qur'an

For example, did you know that the words Man and Woman appear in the Qur'an 23 times each? The total of this is 46, the number of chromosomes that make up a Human's genetic code. How is it possible that without the aid of modern technology, a so-called "charlatan" like Muhammad (pbuh) could have come up with this and the countless other Signs himself?

Is there anything similar in the Bible that suggests to you its authenticity and divine nature?

If I was really going to read crazy stuff into you post I'd say you thought the 9/11 attack were used by the Islamic God to bring more people to him, Whatever...

Now that was a disturbing comment! Muslims mourned with every Christian, Atheist or other person on September 11th. Muslims have no tolerance for attacks against civilians (or suicide), and you're simply misleading yourself if you believe that genuine Islam condones such an action. You refer to God as "the Islamic God." Whether you believe it or not, Muslims are praying to the same God you have, we simply reject that Jesus is divine/God himself, and the concept of the Holy Spirit as also being a part of God.

No one is suggesting that the attacks happened because "the Islamic God" wanted to bring more people to Islam. You're just trying to see a shocking statement where none exists! What I said was, that people after having been afflicted by such a tragedy and told that a terrorist group that perverses Islam was behind it, wanted to find out more about Islam and the Qur'an. When they did start looking, they found what they believed to be God's most recent and final revelation, and so they converted. If a person isn't looking for something, it's unlikely that they'll find it.


whether some people decide they don't wanna eat pork and need to pray towards the east is nothing to me. What is something to me is when my christian brothers are persecuted, when women are abused, when children are trained to hate people they have never seen, for reasons that make no sense and when people fly airplanes into building full of people or preach open destruction of our allies (like the state of israel). Honestly the fact that islamic nations in the middle east are essentially trying to push israel off the map is enough to make them our enemies, we should defend our allies to the absolute death by whatever means necessary.

You talk about Christians and Israelis being persecuted. Why aren't you fighting for the Arabs, Muslims and Palestinians who are being persecuted? Some people don't recognize the state of Israel because no state existed before 1948. Instead, a state was carved out of Palestine, and a number of wars resulted. Israelis continue denying Palestinians political rights, annexing and colonizing their land, and killing their civilians. Are you surprised that there is some animosity towards Israelis? Have you at all followed the war in Lebanon, in which hundreds of innocent people were killed, including the bombing of a UN outpost by Israel's army despite repeated calls to stop? This killed 4 UN peace keepers.

No one is arguing that indiscriminately firing rockets, or engaging in suicide attacks against civilians is justified (or even remotely Islamic!) However, this does not forgive the countless and horrific acts committed by the Israeli government.

In Lebanon alone, the Israeli army used over 90% of their cluster bombs in the days following a ceasefire agreement, but before the ceasefire came into effect.

Read the Human Rights Watch Article regarding this matter, and don't assume that Israel is a "bastion of Judeo-Christian" civilization in what is an otherwise barbarous and backward Muslim neighbourhood. Inform yourself on the many injustices committed by the Israelis, rather than assuming that they are perfect stewards of the "Holy Land." Read this short blurb about the Israeli Absentee Property Law and I guarantee you'll see their actions as completely unjust. Inform yourself! Blind support of Israel is certainly not what God would want, assuming you believe that God is just.

I'm not saying all muslims are evil "terrorists" I"m not saying most are. I'm saying there are many who are, and the so called "moderates" especially over there, feel a lot more sympathetic to them than a lot of people realize.

You certainly don't seem to have an accurate enough understanding of Islam to make these claims. I will grant you one thing however. Muslims could speak out more loudly against acts of terrorism, rather than just despising them inside.

But on the other hand, Christians like yourself could speak out more loudly about the unjust policies of your Government or Israel too. I think it's something incumbent on both communities to do, and I genuinely hope you better inform yourself about why so many Arabs and Muslims dislike Israel, as well as why so many countries, even to this day, refuse to recognize its existence.
 
War on Terror is the politically correct term for War on IslamoFascists.

It will be over when there is no longer a global movement of people using Islam as a tool to recruit and motivate others to commit acts of terror. It's gonna be a long war.
 
The end of the war on terror will probably come when there is a new convinient and ultimately unwinable war comes about. Recall the war on drugs....
 
For example, did you know that the words Man and Woman appear in the Qur'an 23 times each? The total of this is 46, the number of chromosomes that make up a Human's genetic code. How is it possible that without the aid of modern technology, a so-called "charlatan" like Muhammad (pbuh) could have come up with this and the countless other Signs himself?

Putatively, Satan knows how many chromosomes you have too.
How many times are cows mentioned in the Qur'an, and how many chromosomes do they have? Pigs have five chromosomes? (002.173 005.003 005.060 006.145 016.115). Some pig!

Why does a Russian Orthodox Christian "(pbuh)" after "Mohammed"? Why do I run into people who push the "Science in the Qur'an" and then seem dishonest?

stacmon said:
Whether you believe it or not, Muslims are praying to the same God you have, we simply reject that Jesus is divine/God himself, and the concept of the Holy Spirit as also being a part of God.

There we go, clearly you lied to us.
 
I didn't lie to anyone El_Machinae, here's the same reply I gave to your comments in the other thread:

If the above is trying to make me seem inconsistent, you won't have much success.

You don't have to be a Muslim to question the divinity of Jesus Christ.

In my case, the reason things are so complicated is that I have a Muslim father, and a Russian Orthodox mother. I myself am officially Russian Orthodox, but I am extremely skeptical about the argument that Jesus was divine and is the same as God Himself.

When I said we I referred to Muslims and myself included. In every other post I've made, I've managed to remember to distance myself from Islam by speaking about it in the third person, as in:

"Muslims believe this..."

or "In Islam..."

Also, one does not have to be a Muslim to make arguments that favour Islam. Anything I say is fact checked or common knowledge to most Muslims. If you want to bring something specific into dispute, please do, but I don't appreciate the suggestion that I can't make constructive comments regarding Islam unless I'm a Muslim :/

Please don't make a mountain out of a molehill.
 
Now, regarding your comment on the number of chromosomes that Pigs have, and counting the number of times the word pig, or cow appears in the Qur'an that's a red herring.

If you prove someone guilty of a crime, you don't have to prove that everyone else is innocent of it.
 
Ohhh, also, regarding the (pbuh) - which to anyone who doesn't know, means peace and blessings be upon him,

I say that out of respect for all prophets. I may still officially be Orthodox Christian and not Muslim, but until I'm convinced that Muhammad (pbuh) was some kind of raving maniac, or brilliant liar, I'll treat him as a potential prophet.
 
Forgive me for pointing out your inconsistency, like I say elsewhere, if you're not Muslim, I'll believe you if you specifically tell me that you don't believe Mohammed is God's prophet.

The 'Science in the Qur'an' movement has a horrible reputation, and the people who most push it seem to be very dishonest. Of course there are true believing converts to the idea, but there are others who're patently pushing an agenda.

Now, regarding your comment on the number of chromosomes that Pigs have, and counting the number of times the word pig, or cow appears in the Qur'an that's a red herring.

If you prove someone guilty of a crime, you don't have to prove that everyone else is innocent of it.

I don't think it's a red herring. You're assuming something to be significant when it could easily be coincidence. A pattern is required to show that something is done intentionally, that there are hidden truths that are more significant than 'lucky'.

The odds of your 'revelation' are not really all that impressive. And the fact that further revelation is not revealed using the same technique is not all that impressive. It also woefully misses the point that some people have more than 46 chromosomes; you'd think revelation on that would be useful if we're going to condemn homosexual behaviour!

In fact, including a hidden message about human chromosomes and not including a hidden message about pigs seems to be ... well ... looking for criticism. The author should have included a final verse, repeating "swine" 33 more times.

Where's your (pbuh) after Joseph Smith?
 
Now that was a disturbing comment! Muslims mourned with every Christian, Atheist or other person on September 11th. Muslims have no tolerance for attacks against civilians (or suicide), and you're simply misleading yourself if you believe that genuine Islam condones such an action. You refer to God as "the Islamic God." Whether you believe it or not, Muslims are praying to the same God you have, we simply reject that Jesus is divine/God himself, and the concept of the Holy Spirit as also being a part of God.
Now that I must protests, the God of the bible is a trinity, even in the old testament a trinity is implied (got uses plural terms like we when describing himself even in genesis) therefore trying to say we worship the same God simply because we both believe in some of the same OT characters, really doesn't make much sense.

Muslims believe in the total singleness of God and there are worshipping a different God than any serious Christian.

You have to ask yourself, how many lives lost in "collateral damage casualties" is too many? Do you value an Afghani or Iraqi life as much as you do a British or American (Christian) life? If 100-200 innocent people are dieing in Iraq and Afghanistan daily, would you be reacting the same way if they were American/Coalition soldiers or Western civilians instead? --- I doubt it immensely.
Obviously not. Man are created inherently unequal in all things, some are smart and some are dumb, rich or poor, gifted or not. Some are saved by God and some are left to burn. Its the nature of life. Obviously I value the life of people closer to me over those far away, my brother is worth more to me than a stranger. That's just the way life is meant to be. This is why wars occur. At some point someone decides the lives (innocent or not) of the other nations people are expendable in comparison to those of our own. Denying that denies the nature of warfare. Yes we should limit collateral damage, and we do. 98% of the deaths in Iraq are being caused by OTHER Iraqis, not coalition forces. But ultimately the lives of the people of Iraq are expendable in comparison to those of our troops. Just as the lives of our troops are expendable in comparison to the lives of civilians back home, just like the lives of a couple hundred thousands "innocent" Japanese were expendable compared to our ground forces that would have had to invade the Japanese home islands. Its just the way war works. Its not nice or fair.

Then you're simply not following the Iraq war closely enough, and that is NOT besides the point. War and occupation have consequences, you can't simply ignore them and say that they're "besides the point." Here is just one example of the many articles about the growing crisis.
Once again, expendable by comparison. See above.

You argue that these people have been taught since childhood to hate Christianity, and this is simply a ridiculous proposition. Why would Muslims go to all the trouble of attacking the US and the West if they want to go after Christians? 1 million Christians live in Iraq (at least... they used to, who knows how many have stayed thanks to the war and occupation.) Millions of Christians live in Syria, Lebanon, Egypt and other nearby countries. Why not just make the trip there to kill a few Christians, if as argued, that's what they've been brought up to believe.

Unlike what you describe, the reality is quite different. There has been intermarriage between Christians and Muslims, and the fact that these Christian minorities (and Jewish minorities, until the creation of Israel) exist in Muslim countries almost 1400 years after the initial spread of Islam is a strong rebuke of what you're saying.
Your right. I should have said they wanted shots at FREE strong Christian westerners. Obviously nobody cares about suppressed minorities of Christians in Muslim dominated nations, walking around in fear of being grabbed and tortured for preaching the gospel or not wearing there headscarf. Its not just the fact that there Christians. Its that they are American White Christians, the very legions of the great Satan itself. Its obvious that the Iranians/Syrians are supplying weapons and personal to the insurgency in Iraq, its all over the news and its just common sense, why wouldn't they? They obviously hate the US as prime backer of Israel.

What on earth do you mean? "If Muslims stay the way they are now." You have to understand that, especially in Syria (and other countries, such as Egypt, Saddam's Iraq, Libya, etc.) dictatorships or one party systems are accepted and propped up by the US, as long as they serve American interests. As soon as they tug too hard on the leash though, they become demonized as long-standing enemies. You talk about the Muslims in these countries, but many people, for instance the young 20-30 somethings in Iran are (or at least were) very pro American until Bush's administration and its most recent policies. Calling Iran a member of the "Axis of Evil" certainly hasn't improved perceptions of the US among Iranians, and has just given critics of the US more to use in their arguments. Iran has a very young population. For instance, more than 25% are under 14 years old.
I'll allow you that, its obviously a mistake to ally yourself with any Islamic dictatorship, however American policy makers and leaders are short sighted. They where more worried about communism up until about 20 years ago. Militant Islam was not even noticed as a problem, meanwhile Islamic revolutions were setting up the world for the way it is today, all the while being ingored (if not backed on occasion) by the USA.

So how many hard line Christians like you do you think there are in the world? Didn't Jesus say, according to your bible, that if a person strikes you on one cheek, that you should offer them another cheek? How do you reconcile that with your comments about the need to "fight back."
Jesus also told his own disciples to sell there coats and buy swords, because it better to be able to defend yourself than be warm. Striking on the cheek was a common insult in ancient times, it has no bearing on defense, warfare, or anything of the sort. He was saying that if someone insults you ignore him. Honestly I think we have done a whole lot of "ignoring" of militant Islam, pretty much until they started blowing our stuff up.

You talk about Christians and Israelis being persecuted. Why aren't you fighting for the Arabs, Muslims and Palestinians who are being persecuted? Some people don't recognize the state of Israel because no state existed before 1948. Instead, a state was carved out of Palestine, and a number of wars resulted. Israelis continue denying Palestinians political rights, annexing and colonizing their land, and killing their civilians. Are you surprised that there is some animosity towards Israelis? Have you at all followed the war in Lebanon, in which hundreds of innocent people were killed, including the bombing of a UN outpost by Israel's army despite repeated calls to stop? This killed 4 UN peace keepers.
Once again this falls under the "expendability" of the enemy population during warfare.

Honestly its not really relevant anymore, the "Palestinian" state is simply an attempt by Syria to make a land grab into Israel, where the Israelis kicked them out in the 6 days war.

As to not recognizing the state of Israel, is simply ridiculous, not a single individual fighting the Israelis was even alive during the original Israeli War for Independence. The fight is not so much over land as nations like Syria and Iran(via there Palestinian pawns) would have the UN and media believe, but over the existence of a Jewish western nation in the midst of a sea of Islam. Its a religious cultural war far more than a war over a bit of land the Palestinians haven't lived in for over two generations anyway.

You certainly don't seem to have an accurate enough understanding of Islam to make these claims. I will grant you one thing however. Muslims could speak out more loudly against acts of terrorism, rather than just despising them inside.
There we agree on something. And I don't know about you but when I think of speaking out I'm not talking about dancing celebrating in the streets of the cities after our building get blown up.
 
Back
Top Bottom