In this thread I want to discuss the logic of choosing the types of food resources. Since I am a food engineer, I often asked myself why do we have crab, clam and deer in the game while for example potato doesn't appears in the game. First of all, we have to rethink the 3+1 category.
Human body needs three types of nutriments: carbohydrates (60%, especially starch), protein (20%), and fat (20%). In CIV4, there are only three starch based resource (wheat, rice and corn), while protein based resources reach the amount of 7!!! The other problem is that there are no oil seeds. Fat needing can be filled only with animal fat, but this isn't the healthiest way. The only logical "category" from this point of view is sugar based banana. 1out of 11, that's exactly what we need by sugar!
So all in all, there should be less protein based and more starch based resources, and maybe there should be oil seeds in the game, soybean, rape and/or sunflower.
Check what we have in the game:
-The category of grains is more than logical, the three types native in three continents, however in the big part of the world plants none of them, doing this without fearing the lack of starch, planning portato or some kind of cold-likeing grain.
-Stock: this is a logical category as well, but (as I mentioned) I don't think that we need all 4 of them.
-Seafood: the amount of fished clam or even crab much less than fish. I understand that the designers of the game wanted to create more kind of seafood, it makes more useful to build harbor (and maybe lighthouse), but it also results an other problem: there can be leaders with a relatively big coastline, not having fish just clam and crab. Could you imagine it in reality?
-Grocer resources: banana is okay, and I accept that the other three res. are naturally gives +1 happiness, after grocer +1 health, with the exception of sugar. Sugar cane or beet doesn't really matters, the game forgets that it. Producing sugar from beet is quite complicated, the best way would be if after discovering some technology (biology or industrialism) new sugar res. would be appear on the map! sugar beet wasn't planted when the technology wasn't avalaible, sugar cane needs a simplier way.
I'm wondering how will it interest you?
Flóri
Human body needs three types of nutriments: carbohydrates (60%, especially starch), protein (20%), and fat (20%). In CIV4, there are only three starch based resource (wheat, rice and corn), while protein based resources reach the amount of 7!!! The other problem is that there are no oil seeds. Fat needing can be filled only with animal fat, but this isn't the healthiest way. The only logical "category" from this point of view is sugar based banana. 1out of 11, that's exactly what we need by sugar!
So all in all, there should be less protein based and more starch based resources, and maybe there should be oil seeds in the game, soybean, rape and/or sunflower.
Check what we have in the game:
-The category of grains is more than logical, the three types native in three continents, however in the big part of the world plants none of them, doing this without fearing the lack of starch, planning portato or some kind of cold-likeing grain.
-Stock: this is a logical category as well, but (as I mentioned) I don't think that we need all 4 of them.
-Seafood: the amount of fished clam or even crab much less than fish. I understand that the designers of the game wanted to create more kind of seafood, it makes more useful to build harbor (and maybe lighthouse), but it also results an other problem: there can be leaders with a relatively big coastline, not having fish just clam and crab. Could you imagine it in reality?
-Grocer resources: banana is okay, and I accept that the other three res. are naturally gives +1 happiness, after grocer +1 health, with the exception of sugar. Sugar cane or beet doesn't really matters, the game forgets that it. Producing sugar from beet is quite complicated, the best way would be if after discovering some technology (biology or industrialism) new sugar res. would be appear on the map! sugar beet wasn't planted when the technology wasn't avalaible, sugar cane needs a simplier way.
I'm wondering how will it interest you?
Flóri