The Old Empires

What do you think of this scenario

  • Incredible!

    Votes: 55 45.1%
  • Great

    Votes: 33 27.0%
  • Ok

    Votes: 16 13.1%
  • Bad

    Votes: 18 14.8%

  • Total voters
    122
Many thanks. The nick is probably older than many users, a throw back to IRC and hotmail, not specifically this forum. (For example check out hotmail, ICQ and readytogo.net for it's history)

As I said I'm looking forward to the complete version
 
[

"The British navy is incorrect, as is it's level of re-inforcements for it;s army

The Russian navy is incorrect(way to few) as it's reinforcements for it's army (way to many).

The Russian army is way to strong when compared with the Germans and Austrians. I was able to destroy Germany and Austria by the end of 1914"

I see. Present your facts!

Rocoteh
 
"The British navy is incorrect, as is it's level of re-inforcements for it;s army

The Russian navy is incorrect(way to few) as it's reinforcements for it's army (way to many).


I am waiting for your documentation.

In which way is the British Navy incorrect?

In which way is the Russian Navy incorrect?

Rocoteh
 
Originally posted by Rocoteh


"The British navy is incorrect, as is it's level of re-inforcements for it;s army

The Russian navy is incorrect(way to few) as it's reinforcements for it's army (way to many).

The Russian army is way to strong when compared with the Germans and Austrians. I was able to destroy Germany and Austria by the end of 1914"

I see. Present your facts!

Rocoteh

Rocotech, firstly may I say that your tone does not encourage debate. As you are asking for a considerable body of sources (rather than facts) It will take a time to collate and post (I have a full-time job) during the week. Hopefully you will be satisfied with URL's and book references rather than actual quotes?

Additionally I am delighted that I can contribute to the debate, rather than be deemed a figment of your imagination ;o))
 
Originally posted by Happyman
Um i thkink he meant that the russians should be able to replace losses fast and easily

Generally, Id make the Russian infantry weaker, but also to cost a bit less.
 
Originally posted by grumpylad


Rocotech, firstly may I say that your tone does not encourage debate. As you are asking for a considerable body of sources (rather than facts) It will take a time to collate and post (I have a full-time job) during the week. Hopefully you will be satisfied with URL's and book references rather than actual quotes?

Additionally I am delighted that I can contribute to the debate, rather than be deemed a figment of your imagination ;o))

I am pro-historian. If someone says I deliver facts that
are not correct, I expect that person to come up with arguments
and sources.

I have NEVER voted less than good on ANY thread
(scenarios, mods, units etc)

If and when you do it, I think you have an obligation
to present why!

Coming up with some arrogant and perfidious comments
does not impress on me.

Rocoteh
 
Good to see that we are all in agreement and that we understand each other. God why does everyone post when I'm half way through typing just saw what you said rocoteh and I agree. And I just realized this we are all acting a bit like babies.. Every one here except me I'm 11 is fairly old and I think we should be able to talk... I know I'm going to get flamed (well in most places I would) but I thought it was important to say this...
 
"And I just realized this we are all acting a bit like babies.."
Happyman

Talk for your self Happyman.

Rocoteh
 
I knew I would get flamed... lol
 
I have more than 5 years of academic education.

I have been in many interesting discussions.

I hope that I am wrong but the posts from Grumpylad
reminds me of the comments from the kid with rich
parents having a good time whispering jokes about
the teacher.

Rocoteh
 
Now oh never mind....... why bother coming.. Oh yeah and I rest my case about the baby thing...
 
Originally posted by Rocoteh
I have more than 5 years of academic education.

I have been in many interesting discussions.

I hope that I am wrong but the posts from Grumpylad
reminds me of the comments from the kid with rich
parents having a good time whispering jokes about
the teacher.

Rocoteh

I know that type, I dealt with the one in my town ages ago... and it wasnt pleasant at all...
 
At least one person agrees...
 
Originally posted by Sarevok
As much as debates are good things, flamewars arent good for diplomacy or feedback...


You seems to be disturbed by my comments.

OK, I am taking a time-out.

Rocoteh
 
O yeah and Rocoteh the only reson I got all weird on you is I don't like it when people think I'm getting historically inacurate I've taught people twice my age all about that kind of stuff so I just got a bit mad but I honestly was just playing with ya;) :)
 
Originally posted by Rocoteh



You seems to be disturbed by my comments.

OK, I am taking a time-out.

Rocoteh

Not disturbed, I just dont like having fights in the scneario threads as it drives people away.
 
Originally posted by Happyman
O yeah and Rocoteh the only reson I got all weird on you is I don't like it when people think I'm getting historically inacurate I've taught people twice my age all about that kind of stuff so I just got a bit mad but I honestly was just playing with ya;) :)

Good for now, "Playing with us" might not be a good thing in the future. I myself can easily take it the wrong way, then things get ugly real fast.
 
Okie dookie...... But i did mean what i said not the tonned down cussing but every thing else
 
Back
Top Bottom