Trade Term IV: Being Shylock For Fun And Profit!

Minister SaaM:

I must apolgize for my sporadic sightings here in the forum. You see, I've been swamped by homework, miscellaneous other work, and operations as part of my plans for total world domination. I'll try to get things back on track in the RBO.
 
To the trade minister

Id like to request that this ministry concentrate on not trading with China and concentrate on trading with America and Russia and to other nations to compenstate for any loss of trade with China this will limit the economic might of China and prevent it to wage war for imperialist ambition, i hope that no gold or resources or technology is traded with China at all cost, please consider this.

Thank you
regards ali
 
Honored Shylock SaaM and Antonio the Doughnut Monger OctavianX,

Please consider a more aggressive policy of gifting to nations to raise their level of technology and the overall level of technological equality. I would also like the Shylock Ministry to consider all trading partners and to trade with everyone on terms of goodwill and friendship.
 
we as a nation never occupied and detroyed an entire nation like some nations, we have only embarked on one war of national imperialism against Rome in which I greatly opposed every war after that has been only defensive in which we have been attacked
 
ali said:
we as a nation never occupied and detroyed an entire nation like some nations, we have only embarked on one war of national imperialism against Rome in which I greatly opposed every war after that has been only defensive in which we have been attacked

We are occupying, we have "destroyed" (to the point where they will never recover).
 
well if u feel so strong about it Mr. Blackheart perhaps u would like to open a plesbite and if successful give bak the romans some of their lands
 
ali said:
well if u feel so strong about it Mr. Blackheart perhaps u would like to open a plesbite and if successful give bak the romans some of their lands

You know, it's funny that once we've conquered someone there are still people who can't admit that we have conquered, what was it then, an act of self defense? And no, I do not want to give back lands that are already ours.
 
classical_hero said:
@ Ali and Blackheart, are we here to talk about trade issues? If yes, then stop this so we can concentrate on matters of trade, and not this personal fued.

Yes we are, neither of us have gotten a response from Trade officials as of yet, so what better to pass the time? :mischief:
 
This is not the offical policy of the Trade Ministry (ie not Minister SaaM's final say), but it is my belief that we need only make trades that are clearly profitable trades - only money talks to me in this game. Gifting is, in my point of view, is essentially useless to us.
 
Octavian X said:
This is not the offical policy of the Trade Ministry (ie not Minister SaaM's final say), but it is my belief that we need only make trades that are clearly profitable trades - only money talks to me in this game. Gifting is, in my point of view, is essentially useless to us.

That's a perfectly understandable position for a Trade Ministry official to have. However, there are other considerations besides profit. We need to think about helping other nations as well as ourselves. The time for selfish profit is over.
 
We can get the Diplomatic Victory with this attitude, and with no warmongers, dominion or conquest, we have to suffer this game to 2050 thanks to you. Thank you very much.
 
Provolution said:
We can get the Diplomatic Victory with this attitude, and with no warmongers, dominion or conquest, we have to suffer this game to 2050 thanks to you. Thank you very much.

Who are you thanking? :confused:

I can see it from Octavian X's POV. Charity has little place in capitalism, but I like to think of us as not pure capitalists, perhaps 30/70 socialist capitalist.
 
Yeah, you guys are free to drag this out till 2050, so see how many of us that will sweeten your journey.
 
Provolution said:
We can get the Diplomatic Victory with this attitude, and with no warmongers, dominion or conquest, we have to suffer this game to 2050 thanks to you. Thank you very much.

I assume you mean can't...

How exactly is giving gifts to nations and refraining from stationing troops in their land bad diplomacy? Nations like to be treated nicely, that's what diplomacy is. And that's how we'll win the game diplomatically.
 
Provolution said:
Yeah, you guys are free to drag this out till 2050, so see how many of us that will sweeten your journey.

I highly doubt we will go to 2050. If not conquering everyone means going to 2050, I don't know what you're smoking :lol:
 
Stuck_As_a_Mac said:
Gentlemen, it the words of a great man
WRONG FORUM! (now where did that icon got to)

I will set up a discussion later tonight about trading steam for pure cash and doing other trades. Once I eat something.


Sorry about that, SaaM. It seems the pacifist vs. warmonger argument has been spilling into a lot of threads recently. :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom