Musk's DOGE team hit by resignation of 21 technology staffers​

Those resigning say the DOGE team is jeopardizing confidential data of Americans

More than 20 civil service employees resigned Tuesday from billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), saying they were refusing to use their technical expertise to "dismantle critical public services."

"We swore to serve the American people and uphold our oath to the Constitution across presidential administrations," the 21 staffers wrote in a joint resignation letter, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press. "However, it has become clear that we can no longer honour those commitments."

The employees also warned that many of those enlisted by Musk to help him slash the size of the federal government under President Donald Trump's administration were political ideologues who did not have the necessary skills or experience for the task ahead of them.

The mass resignation of engineers, data scientists and product managers comes amid a flurry of court challenges to the purge of the federal workforce led by Musk and Trump, purges that have sought to stall, stop or unwind efforts to fire or coerce thousands of government workers out of jobs.

"We will not use our skills as technologists to compromise core government systems, jeopardize Americans' sensitive data, or dismantle critical public services," they wrote.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday morning.

Slash-and-burn tactics questioned​

The staffers who resigned worked for what was once known as the United States Digital Service. USDS was established over a decade ago to improve services for veterans, and it helped create a free government-run portal so tax filers did not have to go through third parties like TurboTax.

All of those resigning Tuesday previously held senior roles at such tech companies as Google and Amazon and wrote in their resignation letter that they joined the government out of a sense of duty to public service.

The slash-and-burn effort Musk is leading diverges from what was initially outlined by Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign. DOGE, a nod to Musk's favourite cryptocurrency meme coin, was initially presented as a blue-ribbon commission that would exist outside government.

Attorneys general from several states led by Democratic officials have filed suit, arguing that DOGE is illegally accessing confidential information. A judge on Monday, in relation to a suit filed by unions representing federal workers, agreed to temporarily bar the Department of Education and the Office of Personnel Management from disclosing records containing sensitive personal information to DOGE representatives. U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman in Greenbelt, Md., ruled that the Privacy Act was likely violated by disclosing people's personal information to DOGE without their consent.

Despite its name, DOGE is not an official government department, which traditionally have been established by acts of Congress. Trump and Musk have said that "hundreds of millions" of dollars are already being saved, but they have not provided detailed support for those claims.

DOGE published an updated list Monday of nearly 2,300 contracts that agencies terminated in recent weeks across the federal government. Data published on DOGE's "Wall of Receipts" shows that more than one-third of the contract cancellations, 794 in all, are expected to yield no savings. That's usually because the total value of the contracts has already been fully obligated, which means the government has a legal requirement to spend the funds for the goods or services it purchased and in many cases has already done so.

"It's like confiscating used ammunition after it's been shot when there's nothing left in it. It doesn't accomplish any policy objective," said Charles Tiefer, a retired University of Baltimore law professor and expert on government contracting law. "Their terminating so many contracts pointlessly obviously doesn't accomplish anything for saving money."

Federal workers experienced more confusion when Musk demanded they explain their recent accomplishments by the end of Monday or risk termination. Even as that happened, the Office of Personnel Management informed agency leaders that their workers were not required to respond by the deadline of 11:59 p.m. ET Monday.

"'Move fast and break things' may be acceptable to someone who owns a business and owns the risk. And if things don't go well, the damage is compartmentalized. But when you break things in government, you're breaking things that belong to people who didn't sign up for that," said Cordell Schachter, who until last month was the chief information officer at the U.S. Department of Transportation.

'Significant security risks'​

The day after Trump's inauguration, the 21 staffers wrote, they were called into a series of interviews that foreshadowed the secretive and disruptive work of DOGE. According to the staffers, people wearing White House visitor badges, some of whom would not give their names, grilled the nonpartisan employees about their qualifications and politics.

"Several of these interviewers refused to identify themselves, asked questions about political loyalty, attempted to pit colleagues against each other, and demonstrated limited technical ability," the staffers wrote in their letter. "This process created significant security risks."

Earlier this month, about 40 staffers in the office were laid off. The firings dealt a devastating blow to the government's ability to administer and safeguard its own technological footprint, they wrote.

"These highly skilled civil servants were working to modernize Social Security, veterans' services, tax filing, health care, disaster relief, student aid, and other critical services," the resignation letter states. "Their removal endangers millions of Americans who rely on these services every day.

Of the 40 people let go earlier this month, only one was an engineer — an outspoken and politically active staffer named Jonathan Kamens, who said in an interview with the AP that he believes he was fired for publicly endorsing Vice-President Kamala Harris, a Democrat, on his personal blog and being critical of Musk in chats with colleagues.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/us-doge-resignations-1.7467848
 
The staffers who resigned worked for what was once known as the United States Digital Service. USDS was established over a decade ago to improve services for veterans, and it helped create a free government-run portal so tax filers did not have to go through third parties like TurboTax.

All of those resigning Tuesday previously held senior roles at such tech companies as Google and Amazon and wrote in their resignation letter that they joined the government out of a sense of duty to public service.

Trump wants to bring back the ancient spoils system because he thinks the old bureaucracy is even more corrupt. :hammer2:

A lot of DC folks are going to go through tough times.
Perhaps the whole USA and world as well.

USA#1 keeps up the entertainment at least.
With all the blood on the ground, we can't help but watch!
 
the Britisher parts of CFC might have not noticed this yet .


it doesn't say anything about how London now wants the lead in the Middle East . You know with those realist folks in the Middle East . Of oil , of already dominating control of British finance . Trump will very much like the result , thank you very much .
Interesting read. It's truly given some pattern and motive to Trump's seemingly chaotic actions. He uses financial gain/profit as the sole measurement for alliances, soft power, conflict resolution, spheres of influence, and other matters.

How to resolve the conflict in Gaza if we must guarantee Israel's total victory and capitulation? "Make real estate from its rubble! We can invest and find investors. If I have to use America's power to expel Palestinians and make them all a diaspora, to pull them off completely from their roots, we better get infrastructure and real estate business at the end, yeah baby!"

Shall we continue to support Ukraine? "What's in it for us? Ha! If they let us grab their lucrative minerals, then that'll be a deal!"

Alliance with Europe: "Is that even profitable for us"

A strict tangible financial profit is his morality.

This is his policy in the nutshell:


Now that America has gone completely rogue, now perhaps Europe needs Turkey more than ever, like it or not.
 
everything Trump does was tested and perfected in New Turkey over the last 30 years . London owns New Turkey , EU pays 3 billions time to time . Was not fooled by the promise of joining the EU 25 years back , have no intention of letting that bald guy , some person who made the zoo trip to laugh at the face of idiot after a post on French diplomacy , wet himself again . No intention of giving up on the F Fourties for starters . Any cooperation needed ? Definitely not here . Let people make history selling Europe is hope and whatnot .

Moderator Action: No news link. Birdjaguar
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Trump orders copper probe in first step to tariffs​

US President Donald Trump has ordered an investigation of copper imports in what is a first step toward potential tariffs on the metal.

Administration officials said the White House wanted to find ways to boost US production of copper, a component used to make electric cars, ships and data centres that they said was vital to national security.

The move launches a process that Trump previously used to put tariffs on steel and aluminium, opening a new front in his trade war.

Trump has already raised tariffs on goods from China, while threatening a range of more sweeping trade actions, including a 25% border tax on goods from Canada and Mexico and new "reciprocal" tariffs set for each country.

The trade fights have drawn threats of retaliation, while raising alarm among consumers and businesses in the US about higher costs.

Concerns about the plans have contributed to a sharp drop in consumer confidence on recent surveys.

But administration officials said on Tuesday they believed this action was necessary to protect US copper companies from competition from China.

"China has long used industrial capacity and dumping as an economic weapon to dominate global markets, systematically undercutting competitors and driving rivals out of business," Peter Navarro said.

"It's time for copper to come home," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said.
Tariffs are taxes charged on goods imported from other countries, which are paid by the company that is bringing in the goods.

They are intended to support domestic production by making imports more expensive.

The US is already a major copper producer, while also importing the metal mainly from Chile, Canada and Mexico.

China's global copper exports rose last year, as domestic demand weakened, and authorities raced to curb production.

The so-called 232 investigation by the Commerce Department will look at copper imports, as well as imports of copper "derivatives".

The timeline of the probe was not clear. On a background briefing about the action, a White House official said the results of the investigation would inform the level of possible tariffs.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5yxv0yj40ko
 
US threatens permanent visa bans on trans athletes based on sex markers

This is being presented as a visa ban on trans athletes specifically. That already should get the IOC threatening to take the Olympics off the US, for trying to mess with qualified athletes and usurp the IOC authority over who can compete. Usually, for all the IOC's immorality, they're extremely protective of their turf in terms of authority over athletes and competitive access. So it'll be an interesting test case in that respect.

But it's worse than just athletes. The scope here actually appears to be a full ban on trans people with correctly gender affirming identity documents from their own countries, blocking them from obtaining travel visas. By labelling them as fraudulent. That comes with a lifetime ban attached, something normally reserved for criminal behaviour.
 
Last edited:

DOGE Quietly Deletes the 5 Biggest Spending Cuts It Celebrated Last Week​

The cuts, highlighted on an earlier version of the “wall of receipts” posted by Elon Musk’s team, contained mistakes that vastly inflated the amount of money saved.


25up-doge-deletions-qghj-articleLarge.jpg

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, talking about the Department of Government Efficiency at a briefing last week. Credit...Eric Lee/The New York Times


  • Feb. 25, 2025Updated 6:38 p.m. ET

Last week, Elon Musk’s government cost-slashing initiative, which he calls the Department of Government Efficiency, posted an online “wall of receipts,” celebrating how much it had saved by canceling federal contracts.

Now the organization, which is also known as the U.S. DOGE Service, has deleted all of the five biggest “savings” on that original list, after The New York Times and other media outlets pointed out they were riddled with errors.

The last of the original top five disappeared from the site in the early hours of Tuesday, even as the group claimed in its latest update that its savings to date had increased to $65 billion. The website offered no explanation for why it had removed some items or how it had arrived at the higher total. Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, sent a written statement that did not address the deletions, but provided a broader defense of the cost-cutting initiative, saying it “has already identified billions of dollars in savings.”

The “wall of receipts” is the only public ledger the organization has produced to document its work. The scale of that ledger’s errors — and the misunderstandings and poor quality control that seemed to underlie them — has raised questions about the effort’s broader work, which has led to mass firings and cutbacks across the federal government.

These were the original five largest savings on its list:

  • An $8 billion cut at Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The actual contract in question was worth $8 million. The mistake seemed to stem from an earlier, erroneous entry in a federal contracting database. But contracting experts said that the service should have known better: ICE’s entire budget is about $8 billion, making it implausible that one contract could be so large. The U.S. DOGE Service adjusted the figure on the site after The Times wrote about it, and said in a post on Mr. Musk’s X platform that it had “always used the correct $8M in its calculations.”
  • Three $655 million cuts at the U.S. Agency for International Development. This was actually a single cut that was erroneously counted three times, as first reported by CBS News. That mistake also seemed to reflect a misunderstanding of the way government contracts work; they sometimes have “ceiling values” far in excess of what will be spent. Experts said this cancellation was unlikely to produce anything close to $655 million in savings even once. Now, the site lists a much smaller savings for these three cancellations: $18 million in total.
  • A $232 million cut at the Social Security Administration. Here, Mr. Musk’s organization appeared to have mistakenly believed that the agency had canceled a huge information technology contract with the defense contracting giant Leidos. Instead, as reported by The Intercept, it had canceled only a tiny piece of it: a $560,000 project to let users mark their gender as “X.” The DOGE site now shows that small cut instead.
Some of the new canceled contracts added this week appear to make some of the same types of errors.

The largest savings on the latest version of its list is a $1.9 billion cut at the Treasury Department. But The Times reported last week that this contract was canceled last fall, when Joseph R. Biden Jr. was president — and when DOGE did not yet exist.
 
Guess who is going to take the fall for Musk? Guess who is on vacation in Mexico?

White House reveals who DOGE acting administrator is​

Updated 8:15 PM EST, Tue February 25, 2025




This undated photo from LinkedIn shows Amy Gleason.

This undated photo from LinkedIn shows Amy Gleason.
From Amy Gleason/LinkedIn
CNN —
Amy Gleason is the acting administrator of the US DOGE Service, the agency that houses the temporary Department of Government Efficiency, a White House official told CNN on Tuesday.

The announcement, after weeks of questions about Elon Musk’s official role and authority over DOGE, reveals the technical leader of the Musk-driven initiative tasked with reconfiguring the federal government.

Gleason has a background in health care and previously worked at the US Digital Service, an office created by President Barack Obama and most recently named after DOGE. Her position with DOGE was first reported by the Washington Examiner.



Elon Musk attends a meeting with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office at the White House on February 13, in Washington, DC.
Related articleHow DOGE cracked Washington: A focus on arcane agencies gave Musk and his allies swift control of government nerve centers

She also worked in President Donald Trump’s first term, including being placed on the White House Coronavirus Task Force’s data team because of her technology background. That team was led by Dr. Deborah Birx.

Despite pledging full transparency, the White House has refused or been unable to identify the administrator of DOGE, including during Tuesday’s press briefing. While Musk has served as the initiative’s public face and continues to issue social-media directives to government workers, the White House has maintained that his status is one of a special government employee, and not a full-time worker.

“So, the president tasked Elon Musk to oversee the DOGE effort,” press secretary Karoline Leavitt said earlier Tuesday when asked directly who was administering the initiative. “There are career officials and there are political appointees who are helping run DOGE on a day-to-day basis.”

Justice Department attorneys were grilled in a court appearance Monday about who the administrator was, but none were able to say then, either.

“Who’s involved? Who’s in charge? Who’s giving them direction?” Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly asked government attorneys at the hearing, which examined DOGE’s access to sensitive data systems at the Treasury Department.

Judges, including Kollar-Kotelly, have raised the lack of clarity around DOGE’s structure as impeding their ability to decide the emergency disputes before them.

She and others have raised possible constitutional issues, depending on the chain of command at DOGE and who is behind the sweeping decisions that have the upended federal government’s operations in recent weeks.

The White House official did not say how long Gleason has been the acting adminstrator.
 
Last edited:
exclusive

Trump allies circulate mass deportation plan calling for ‘processing camps’ and a private citizen ‘army’​

The group, led by Blackwater veteran Erik Prince, has close Trump ties.
Mexican immigration officials and police escort deportees.


Mexican immigration officials and police escort deportees after they were sent back into Mexico last month in Nogales, Arizona. | John Moore/Getty Images

By Dasha Burns and Myah Ward

02/25/2025 05:55 AM EST


A group of prominent military contractors, including former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince, has pitched the Trump White House on a proposal to carry out mass deportations through a network of “processing camps” on military bases, a private fleet of 100 planes, and a “small army” of private citizens empowered to make arrests.

The blueprint — laid out in a 26-page document President Donald Trump’s advisers received before the inauguration — carries an estimated price tag of $25 billion and recommends a range of aggressive tactics to rapidly deport 12 million people before the 2026 midterms, including some that would likely face legal and operational challenges, according to a copy obtained by POLITICO.

The group, which includes some former immigration officials, is led by Prince, who has close ties to Trump, and Bill Mathews, the former chief operating officer of Blackwater, the military contractor known for its role in providing security, training and logistical support to U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan during the war on terror.

The emergence of the proposal, marked “unsolicited,” is indicative of the major hurdles the administration faces as it struggles to find the resources to fulfill Trump’s ambitious deportation agenda. The administration’s desire to make good on that signature campaign promise has created an opening for private contractors who see a rare area in which the Trump administration is likely to increase spending.

Deporting 12 million people in two years “would require the government to eject nearly 500,000 illegal aliens per month,” the document says. “To keep pace with the Trump deportations, it would require a 600% increase in activity. It is unlikely that the government could swell its internal ranks to keep pace with this demand …in order to process this enormous number of deportations, the government should enlist outside assistance.”

Top White House officials are having multiple conversations with military contractors, coinciding with Republicans’ mad dash on Capitol Hill to secure more resources for the president’s immigration crackdown. Immigration and Customs Enforcement increased arrests during Trump’s first couple of weeks in office, but the pace has since slowed, and arrests do not always equal deportations. The pressure campaign to rapidly increase the president’s deportation numbers has already resulted in the reassigning of top immigration officials as the administration faces a number of resource challenges, including a need for detention capacity and additional personnel.

“People want this stood up quickly, and understand the government is always very slow to do things,” said Steve Bannon, who served in Trump’s first term, remains close to the president and is aware of the proposal. “It’s smart to start bidding out right now and get a feel for what else outside companies, contractors can do.”

It’s not clear if the president has seen the plan, which has been circulating among Trump allies since December. Trump had vowed that mass deportations would begin on his first day in office, a promise he has not kept.

A White House spokesman, Kush Desai, said the administration “remains aligned on and committed to a whole-of-government approach to securing our borders, mass deporting criminal illegal migrants, and enforcing our immigration laws.”

“While White House officials receive numerous unsolicited proposals from various private sector players, it is ultimately up to the agencies responsible for carrying out the President’s agenda to consider and sign contracts to advance their mission,” Desai said.


Hegseth promises 'shift' in Pentagon's role at the border

When reached for comment, Mathews told POLITICO: “We have not been contacted by, nor have we had any discussions with, the government since the White Paper that we submitted months ago. There has been zero show of interest or engagement from the government and we have no reason to believe there will be.”

 
exclusive

Trump allies circulate mass deportation plan calling for ‘processing camps’ and a private citizen ‘army’​

The group, led by Blackwater veteran Erik Prince, has close Trump ties.
Mexican immigration officials and police escort deportees.


Mexican immigration officials and police escort deportees after they were sent back into Mexico last month in Nogales, Arizona. | John Moore/Getty Images

By Dasha Burns and Myah Ward

02/25/2025 05:55 AM EST


A group of prominent military contractors, including former Blackwater CEO Erik Prince, has pitched the Trump White House on a proposal to carry out mass deportations through a network of “processing camps” on military bases, a private fleet of 100 planes, and a “small army” of private citizens empowered to make arrests.

The blueprint — laid out in a 26-page document President Donald Trump’s advisers received before the inauguration — carries an estimated price tag of $25 billion and recommends a range of aggressive tactics to rapidly deport 12 million people before the 2026 midterms, including some that would likely face legal and operational challenges, according to a copy obtained by POLITICO.

The group, which includes some former immigration officials, is led by Prince, who has close ties to Trump, and Bill Mathews, the former chief operating officer of Blackwater, the military contractor known for its role in providing security, training and logistical support to U.S. forces in Iraq and Afghanistan during the war on terror.

The emergence of the proposal, marked “unsolicited,” is indicative of the major hurdles the administration faces as it struggles to find the resources to fulfill Trump’s ambitious deportation agenda. The administration’s desire to make good on that signature campaign promise has created an opening for private contractors who see a rare area in which the Trump administration is likely to increase spending.

Deporting 12 million people in two years “would require the government to eject nearly 500,000 illegal aliens per month,” the document says. “To keep pace with the Trump deportations, it would require a 600% increase in activity. It is unlikely that the government could swell its internal ranks to keep pace with this demand …in order to process this enormous number of deportations, the government should enlist outside assistance.”

Top White House officials are having multiple conversations with military contractors, coinciding with Republicans’ mad dash on Capitol Hill to secure more resources for the president’s immigration crackdown. Immigration and Customs Enforcement increased arrests during Trump’s first couple of weeks in office, but the pace has since slowed, and arrests do not always equal deportations. The pressure campaign to rapidly increase the president’s deportation numbers has already resulted in the reassigning of top immigration officials as the administration faces a number of resource challenges, including a need for detention capacity and additional personnel.

“People want this stood up quickly, and understand the government is always very slow to do things,” said Steve Bannon, who served in Trump’s first term, remains close to the president and is aware of the proposal. “It’s smart to start bidding out right now and get a feel for what else outside companies, contractors can do.”

It’s not clear if the president has seen the plan, which has been circulating among Trump allies since December. Trump had vowed that mass deportations would begin on his first day in office, a promise he has not kept.

A White House spokesman, Kush Desai, said the administration “remains aligned on and committed to a whole-of-government approach to securing our borders, mass deporting criminal illegal migrants, and enforcing our immigration laws.”

“While White House officials receive numerous unsolicited proposals from various private sector players, it is ultimately up to the agencies responsible for carrying out the President’s agenda to consider and sign contracts to advance their mission,” Desai said.


Hegseth promises 'shift' in Pentagon's role at the border

When reached for comment, Mathews told POLITICO: “We have not been contacted by, nor have we had any discussions with, the government since the White Paper that we submitted months ago. There has been zero show of interest or engagement from the government and we have no reason to believe there will be.”

Like any mass population expulsion, this is going to kill a lot of people
 
USAID budget cuts stopped and all past bills must be paid by Midnight Wednesday.

For Trump, 3 court losses in 90 minutes​

Devan Cole
By Devan Cole, CNN
4 minute read
Updated 5:20 PM EST, Tue February 25, 2025



President Donald Trump walks to the Residence after arriving to the White House on February 22, 2025 in Washington, DC.

President Donald Trump walks to the Residence after arriving to the White House on February 22, 2025 in Washington, DC.
Tierney L. Cross/Getty Images
CNN —
Three different federal judges delivered legal setbacks and slap downs to President Donald Trump in the span of an hour and a half on Tuesday in a series of cases challenging controversial moves taken during the early days of his second term.

The rulings from judges in Washington, DC, and Washington state are the latest to pump the brakes on Trump’s agenda, underscoring the critical role courts have taken on for foes of Trump looking to frustrate his actions.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan attends a farewell ceremony for Attorney General Merrick Garland at the Department of Justice, Thursday, Jan. 16, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein)

Related articleSkeptical judges may make the Trump administration explain what it’s doing behind the scenes


In DC, Judge Loren AliKhan issued a preliminary injunction that indefinitely blocks the administration from freezing federal grants and loans. The ruling expands an earlier block the appointee of former President Joe Biden issued last month shortly after the White House ordered the funding freeze.

“In the simplest terms, the freeze was ill-conceived from the beginning. Defendants either wanted to pause up to $3 trillion in federal spending practically overnight, or they expected each federal agency to review every single one of its grants, loans, and funds for compliance in less than twenty-four hours. The breadth of that command is almost unfathomable,” AliKhan wrote in her ruling. She went on to say that the spending freeze was “irrational, imprudent, and precipitated a nationwide crisis.”

The issue of withholding federal funds has become a major flashpoint during the opening weeks of Trump’s second term, with other pending cases challenging the White House’s decision to suspend all foreign assistance.

Shortly before AliKhan issued her ruling, a separate jurist in the DC federal courthouse – Judge Amir Ali – ordered the Trump administration to pay foreign aid-related money owed to government contractors and nonprofit groups by Wednesday night, amid the legal fight over the freezing of USAID and State Department funds.

That order amounted to a legal reprimand after the plaintiffs in the cases repeatedly accused the administration of not complying with Ali’s earlier temporary restraining order that revived the funding contracts and grants that existed at the end of the Biden administration.

Ali – also a Biden appointee – rebuffed an earlier call by the challengers for the administration to be held in contempt for its alleged non-compliance. But he issued a new order requiring, in more forceful terms, that the government pay money owed to contractors and non-profits for work that had already been completed by the February 13 order.

In this September 2015 photo, anti-death penalty activists rally outside the Supreme Court in a final attempt to prevent the execution of Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip on in Washington, DC.


Meanwhile, across the country in Washington state, a federal judge in Seattle issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday that halts Trump’s executive order suspending refugee admissions and funding. Judge Jamal Whitehead, who was also appointed by Biden, said that Trump’s “actions amount to an effective nullification of congressional will in establishing the nation’s refugee admissions program.”

“While the president has substantial discretion to suspend refugee admissions, that authority is not limitless,” the judge said.

Trump’s executive order, signed on his first day back in office, also directed a review of the refugee program and stated that resettlement should only resume if deemed to be in the “national interest” – a move critics argue is a de facto refugee ban.

Cases advance to next stages​

The administration is facing at least 80 cases challenging a range of actions taken during Trump’s first few weeks back in office.

The plaintiffs behind those challenges have seen some success as they’ve pressed judges to issue emergency relief during the early stages of the litigation. But the White House, too, has scored some court victories in cases brought against the administration’s efforts to shrink the federal workforce and shutter the US’ foreign aid agency.

Many of the cases are finally getting a more thorough review by judges who are mulling whether to issue preliminary injunctions to block the contested government action. Such a decision is often the final trial court-level ruling issued in cases before they’re appealed by the losing side.

A television microphone lies on the ground outside the White House West Wing on January 29, 2025 in Washington, DC.


As AliKhan explained her reasoning for issuing the preliminary injunction in the funding freeze case, she said the nonprofits that brought the case were likely to succeed on their claims that the freeze was unlawful.
“The scope of power (the Office of Management and Budget) seeks to claim is ‘breathtaking,’ and its ramifications are massive,” she wrote. “Because there is no clear statutory hook for this broad assertion of power, Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of this claim.”

And AliKhan noted that her earlier order temporarily halting the funding freeze was just that – temporary.

“The relief Plaintiffs now seek is a more durable version of the relief they sought then, when their members were on the brink of extinction,” she wrote. “In sum, Plaintiffs have marshalled significant evidence indicating that the funding freeze would be economically catastrophic – and in some circumstances, fatal – to their members.”



 
A tourist from Gaines County, Texas who eventually tested positive for measles may have exposed thousands of people in San Antonio, San Marcos, and New Braunsfels to the disease over the Valentine's Day weekend.


Friday, February 14th:

  • Texas State University in San Marcos from approximately 3 p.m. to 7 p.m.
  • Twin Peaks restaurant in San Marcos from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m.
Saturday, February 15th:

  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Main Campus between 10 a.m. and 2 p.m.
  • San Antonio River Walk attractions— Wax Museum, Ripley’s Believe It or Not and Ripley’s Illusion Lab between 2:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m on Saturday, February 15th.
  • Mr. Crabby's Seafood and Bar in Live Oak between 6 p.m. and 8 p.m.
Sunday, February 16th:

  • New Braunfels Buc-ees between 9 a.m. and noon.
 
Thank you Trump, RFK. and all you anti vaccers. Don't forget to fire all those folks from NIH. From the link above.

"Measles was declared eradicated in the United States in 2000. This was achieved through a successful vaccination program that ensured high levels of immunity in the population.

About Measles

Measles spreads easily through the air when an infected person breathes, talks, coughs or sneezes. The virus can stay in the air and on surfaces for two hours, even after the infected person has left. The infected person can spread the disease up to four days before a measles rash appears and up to four days after the rash appears. If other people breathe the contaminated air or touch the infected surface, then touch their eyes, noses or mouths, they can become infected."
 
What on earth can you even say about this. He's a monster leading other monsters and supported by monsters.

 
What on earth can you even say about this. He's a monster leading other monsters and supported by monsters.

Is that a joke, a parody account? or is it shamelessly real?

tell me.
 
That's his actual account, it's on his insta as well
 
That's his actual account, it's on his insta as well
Such a low, heinous being, to say it no class is even an understatement, a very spitable entity. 🤢🤮
 
The US is currently run by people who circulate memes on the internet as the primary sources of information.
 
Back
Top Bottom