Turn 12, 3450 BC

[DaveShack]

Settler completes, moves NW+N.
Start building Curragh
Wines connected (but worker move used up, in MP multi-turn actions show up as completed at the beginning of the turn where they would complete vs. end of turn in SP)
Lux to 0%, Science to 100%. Writing in 24
Warrior N sees lots more hills
Growth in 3, Curragh in 5 (working the cow)

questions:
Should a curragh be next?
see turn 11 thread, as it sits we will be building 1N of current settler position unless there is a groundswell of support for CxxxC settlement pattern.

Are we ever going to formalize a government?

doublecheck which forum this is in...

Our lands:

 

[magnusmarcus]

Do we really want a curraigh? How about some more troops so we can pop that hut...... and we could use it for mp.....

 

[admiral-bell]

we need a settler as soon as possible

 

[DaveShack]

We have a settler, enroute to the 2nd city site. At size 1 it will be a little bit before we have another...

 

[admiral-bell]

oops. Yeah thats good

 

[Tomoyo]

I think the curragh is the best choice - it's faster to explore by sea for contacts.

 

[WarDance]

I agree with the curragh. A warrior after would be good. Sometime soon after a second curragh going the other direction would be useful, too. Not necessarily immediately after, but soon.