TWTUD II Subthread: Council of Nations

Nippon votes aye of 004
 
Brazil agrees with the honorable delegate from Andalusia's proposition and we'd like to follow that with true actions for the Council of Nations. We believe military force is needed to resolve the situations in Liberia and South Africa, areas which are nearing a collapse into anarchy. We are not merely outlining that we should send in military forces but we are also proposing a post-war plan for peace in both regions. BRazil has stated that it is willing to contribute 40 brigades to assist in the peace making in both regions.

005-1983: On Council of Nations Intervention in Liberia.
The Council of Nations will deploy military forces to halt the Mexican invasion of Liberia. A counteroffensive will also be launched to prevent future Mexican acts of aggression, occupying and installing a new government in the Mexican Free State as well as liberating the occupied nation of Sokoto. The Council of nations response force will be deployed, but requests deployment of national military forces as well.
Votes For: Brazil
Votes Against:
Abstain:

006-1983: Resolution on the Civil War in South Africa
The Council of Nations will deploy military forces to restore stability to the nation of South Africa. We call for mediation between the various factions, and the creation of a demilitarized zone between the island of Madagascar and the mainland. We will also call for restoration of complete republican government in South Africa with equal votes for all of its citizens.
Votes For:
Votes Against:
Abstain:
 
Andalusia votes AYE on Resolutions 005-1983 and 006-1983. Something must be done so that peace reaches those zones as soon as possible. Also, we pledge $5,000M to the Council of Nations' Bank Account.

We also hope that the Union of Federated States joins the Council of Nations as soon as possible, no matter the fact that he is fighting against one of the Council's members, and once fought against many others.

OOC: The situation in the MFS reminds me of the one in TWTUD with the Congress of British Workers. Will it end the same way as in TWTUD?

@EQ: Nippon already voted for Resolution 004.
 
D-A-I Votes Aye on 004-005 and 006. They also pledge 30,000M to the fund and offer direct military work against the Mexican Free State for the protection of the Islamic population in north Africa.
 
D-A-I Votes Aye on 004-005 and 006. They also pledge 30,000M to the fund and offer direct military work against the Mexican Free State for the protection of the Islamic population in north Africa.

OOC: We are fortunate that there are Islamic people affected by this, if there weren't I'd bet that Dar-Al-Islam wouldn't move a finger as long as the infidels were getting killed. :D:D Just joking, don't take this personally!
 
Germania abstains from 004, 005, and 006.
 
Nippon votes Neigh on resolution 5 and 6
 
The Union of Scandinavia abstains on voting in Resolutions 004-1983, 005-1983 and 006-1983.

Also, we shall be donating a large Sum of Money in the coming year, however, we need to let the Finance Ministers work out the exact Sum when the Scandinavian Budget is released later this Year.
 
Ah Carmen you dog.
 
:rotfl: Already?

Turan Ummah Abstains on points 004 and 005, we agree on points 002 and 003. We apologize for not being here, our diplomat/president went to sleep.
 
007-1983: Resolution on Council of Nations Membership
The Council of Nations will open up membership offers to all nations recognized by at least 5 other CoN member states.

Votes For: Vietnam
Votes Against:
Abstain:

008-1983: Resolution to Re-adopt the Untied Nations Constitution and Rename the new Council of Nations

Spoiler :
United Nations Constitution

Preamble

Article 1. The United Nations is designed to serve as a location from which the nations of the world can bring up issues of concern, and mediate disputes and/or conflicts across the world.

Article 2. The structure of the United Nations is divided into four sections: the General Assembly, the Leadership Council, the International Police Force, and the UN Domestic Services Group.

Section One: United Nations General Assembly

Article 1. The main purpose of the General Assembly is as a place for the nations of the world to openly discuss and negotiate their disputes before resorting to violent conflict, and to vote on the various resolutions which affect the security and safety of the world.

Article 2. The United Nations General Assembly simply consists of the Representatives from all legitimate governments that express a desire to be part of the United Nations.

Article 3. For the purposes of the United Nations, a legitimate government is any nation that has its sovereignty recognized by 2/3 of the General Assembly and has maintained a stable territorial claim for a minimal period of three years.

Article 4. Resolutions can be proposed by any member nation of the General Assembly, and these can vary in size and content.

Article 5. If a resolution receives a simple majority of “ayes” within the General Assembly, the resolution would then pass onto the Leadership Council for a final vote.

Article 6. The General Assembly has the power to vote in four of the nine seats on the Leadership Council. This vote will be held one every ten years.

Section Two: United Nations Leadership Council

Article 1. The United Nations Leadership Council consists of 9 nations.

Article 2. There are five permanent seats and four rotating seats on the Leadership Council.

Article 3. The five permanent seats are held by the five most powerful nations in the world. This assessment will be made by an independent and neutral committee, and will be conducted every 10 years.

Article 4. The four rotating seats are elected by the General Assembly for a term of ten years, with renewed elections every ten years.

Article 5. If the committees cannot reach a consensus on any permanent seat, it will be put to vote between the three most eligible nations.

Article 6. Should any seat become empty, due to a nation leaving the United Nations or ceasing to exist, the appropriate measures will be taken to put a nation in the seat to serve the remainder of the term.

Article 7. Members of the Leadership Council cannot vote in the election of another nation to the Council.

Article 8. All members of the Leadership Council possess a half-veto. It takes two members of the Council to end a Resolution.

Article 9. Resolutions which arrive from the General Assembly must be passed by the Leadership Council before they can be enacted. A full veto can stop a resolution in its path.

Article 10. If a decision by the International Court is appealed, the Leadership Council acts as a supreme judicial body.

Article 11. Should a member of the Leadership Council be demonstrating that it is not assisting the United Nations, a member of the Council can call for a vote of no confidence in that nation. This vote must be approved unanimously by the Council for a new election to determine a replacement. The nation which is being called out cannot participate in this vote.

Section Three: United Nations Judicial System

Article 1. The United Nations Judicial System is divided into three divisions: the International Police, the International Court, and the Investigations Department.

Article 2. The International Police are the military forces of the United Nations. These forces are trained to protect United Nations personnel in their duties among the world at large. While there are some air forces and armored vehicles, these elements are small to insignificant.

Article 3. The maximum size limit of the International Police are two full divisions.

Article 4. The International Police can never be sent to invade a nation, though elements of the IPF can be used to assist a multi-national task force, if a resolution is passed by the Leadership Council. These circumstances would be handled on a case by case basis.

Article 5. International Court will be established to try individuals on crimes against humanity. These cases will be selected by the United Nations General Assembly, and if the Court is unable to pass a verdict, the case will pass on to the Leadership Council to be treated as a normal resolution. (Case will be handled completely NPC unless it is highly controversial)

Article 6. The United Nations Investigation Division is what is used when the UN needs more information on a certain subject or incident. They must request permission to instigate investigations. All investigation teams must be international and members will be cleared for bias on behalf of corruption or national allegiance.


Votes For: Vietnam
Votes Against:
Abstain:
 
We vote no to each of Vietnam's propositions. We would also like to make a vocal argument against both.

007 (hehe): This body can not allow the admission of aggressor and evil states like those of the communist bloc. We can easily see the instability they cause in the UFS, South Africa, and Liberia. We must also recall the millions upon millions slaughtered in Soviet work camps during the Third World War. Communism is a scourge upon the world which must be halted and driven back at every turn. We will not allow them admission in this Council because they will only do their best to sabotauge our righteous motives.

008: We firmly believe that no nation should hold a true veto. They only hinder progress and cripple the efficiency and ability of this august body. A vote for this proposition will hamper our ability to function as an international organization. All nations here are equal or none are.
 
BRazil has recieved good word that Dar-al-islam has also voted no against Vietnam's propositions.
 
Does not Brazil have a veto power currently? Can Brazil not block any resolution from reaching voting?
 
We don't believe in using it, and we'd actually like to introduce a proposition to eliminate that altogether now that you mention it.
 
Andalusia agrees with Brazil, and votes NO in Resolutions 007-1983 and 008-1983. As for the elimination of the veto power:

009-1983 Resolution on the matter of the Veto Power
No Sovereign Nation in the Council of Nations shall have a veto power over the resolutions passed by the Council. Only a Head Council, formed by nine (9) nations chosen randomly every two (2) years, shall have the power to stop a Resolution, only if the whole Head Council reaches an unanimity.
Votes For: Andalusia
Votes Against: Germania
Abstain:

And something from the old UN Constitution makes me remember about something else.

010-1983 Resolution on the Sovereignity of Nations
A nation won't be considered Sovereign unless at least 2/3 of the Council of Nations vote in favour of admitting her. Those which are actually in the Council of Nations shall be excepted from this vote.
Votes For: Andalusia
Votes Against: Germania
Abstain:

011-1983 Resolution on the Government of the Nation
Should the legitimate Government of a Nation fall by illegal means (e.g: a coup d'état), the Council of Nations shall not recognise the new government as the legal and rightful Government of said nation, and use every possible resource to reinstate the legitimate Government.
Votes For: Andalusia
Votes Against: Germania
Abstain:

EDIT: If someone desires to propose better resolutions than these, I will support them.
 
Germania votes nay on 009, 010, and 011.
 
Back
Top Bottom