Virtual PC is effectively useless for any graphics-intensive programs, including and especially games. It's just too slow for that, even on the latest systems.
1. XP just uses more system resources than earlier Windows OS's. I've never seen any indication that it improves effective system speed on a given CPU. Quite the reverse - the minimum system spec is higher for XP than for 98.
2. A dual CPU will only give you any speed improvement if the software takes advantage and spreads its load across the two CPUs. I very much doubt if this is the case with Civ3 running emulated in VPC.
3. A G5 - single or dual - won't run VPC at all, and Microsoft, who now own Connectix, have given no indication that they plan to change that in future.
4. I doubt if VPC is affected much by whether it's running in Jaguar or Panther, as it must be driving the CPU directly, at assembler level, in order to achieve any kind of performance. It will only be using the OS to provide a window to run in and associated menus and such. I doubt it could use Quartz Extreme, for example, to render the Windows screen emulation. That has to be done pixel by pixel.
Originally posted by AlanH
I'm not sure why any of that would be any better.
2. A dual CPU will only give you any speed improvement if the software takes advantage and spreads its load across the two CPUs. I very much doubt if this is the case with Civ3 running emulated in VPC.
3. A G5 - single or dual - won't run VPC at all, and Microsoft, who now own Connectix, have given no indication that they plan to change that in future.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.