What Civs would you want to see in Civ 6? - Asia

What Civs would you want to see in Civ 6? - Asia

  • Vietnam

    Votes: 12 46.2%
  • Siam

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • Burma/Myanmar

    Votes: 7 26.9%
  • Philipines

    Votes: 4 15.4%
  • Khazar Khanate/ Kazakhstan

    Votes: 2 7.7%
  • Tuva

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Babylon

    Votes: 15 57.7%
  • Oman

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • Hittites/Hatti

    Votes: 14 53.8%
  • Ainu

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • Malaysia

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Tibet

    Votes: 11 42.3%
  • Yakutsk/Sakha

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • Israel/Hebrews/Judea

    Votes: 11 42.3%
  • Other (Comment) (sorry for not putting in Europe's)

    Votes: 6 23.1%

  • Total voters
    26

AaronTBD

Warlord
Joined
May 19, 2020
Messages
175
I'll do North America tomorrow
 
I voted for:
Vietnam
Siam
Babylon
and other: as in Assyria
 
I am biased for the Hittite, Sumeria, Babylon triangle ever since it was in civ 3.

I would prefer Myannmar/Burma to Vietnam but I am not picky.

And since it is a wanted list I will throw Judea a bone since it is not going to happen.
 
I voted Babylon, Hittites, Judah, and Other--Assyria and Sogdia. Well, and Elam, but its chances aren't much higher than Judah's simply because, despite its enormous importance, it's relatively unknown to layfolk and overlaps heavily with Persia. :(
 
Vote for Tibet, and other: Sogdia.
 
I voted for Babylon, Vietnam, Hittites and other: Assyria. Although Siam is not far behind them on my wish list.
 
Voted for Babylon, Burma, Vietnam and Tibet.
 
Vietnam is pretty much a guarantee at this point so I didn't vote for it.

Burma and Oman are really great regional/cultural space-fillers and I think really should be in VI if development goes on long enough. As far as Babylon, Philippines (Tondo), Siam (Bangkok), Malaysia (Kuala Lumpur), Israel (Jerusalem), these all feel much better as city-states.

I gave my remaining votes to Tibet and Sakha. While I would be happy with Lhasa and Yakutsk city-states, I also think that if we can have large sprawls like America and Canada subdivided by civs like the Cree or the Sioux/Shoshone, then there really isn't much reason why Russia and especially China deserve to represent so much territory. The only reason we don't have a Tibetan or Siberian civ is because of politics, but absent that I would absolutely advocate for representing some of the cultural diversity encompassed by larger nations. And, while it can be disputed to what extent Siberia/Sakha contained any actual empires, the exclusion of Tibet just really sucks.

Also, shoutout to @Thenewwwguy because if China should have Tibet and Russia should have Sakha, then the Indian subcontinent could absolutely stand to have a Chola civ.
 
voted for Burma, Babylon, Hittites, Tibet but this was a really unfair question bcs so many of these choices are extremely valid civs which I’d love to see. Vietnam, Ainu or Sakha (both are part of the same overarching culture group so maybe not both but one of them), Oman are civs I would’ve chosen had I had more selection options

In terms of other, i didn’t select it, but my number 1 civ request overall, but in Asia especially, are the Chola, as @PhoenicianGold mentioned. I’d also vote for the Sogdians, Kush ites, Mughals, Jurchen, Timurids, Afghans, Ghaznavids, Lan Xang, Champa, Elam and Mitanni, but those weren’t options lol
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom