It think it's safe to say that 100 players are less efficiant than one player!! We don't want to get caned before we can establish a large empire. Some of the most fun parts of this demogame have been establishing provinces, building NPs, winning wars having lots of people involved as Governors and Mayors. These would be impossible, or more difficult, as a small empire. I don't think we should play any higher than Monarch.
I'm tempted to agree with the poofy wig guy. An easy civ game would allow for more fun in the demo game role playing area. But, I voted emperor because we just can't play at a lower level than they do at that other site.
I vote Monarch, or at least no higher than emporer. And it is true, more people are less efficient, but on the other hand every minute detail gets scrutinized as opposed to the lazy way I play.
I like Emporer too. Even though the process is more important than the challenge of the game, it might be more interesting if the challenge was greater.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.