What difficulty level should we play?

What difficulty level should we play?

  • Chieftain

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Warlord

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Regent

    Votes: 2 5.7%
  • Monarch

    Votes: 10 28.6%
  • Emperor

    Votes: 14 40.0%
  • Deity

    Votes: 9 25.7%

  • Total voters
    35

Chieftess

Moderator
Retired Moderator
Joined
Feb 10, 2002
Messages
24,160
Location
Baltimore
Choose between Chieftain to Deity.
 
DIETY, let's take on a Challenge.
 
Originaly posted by Octavian X
Let's show those Apolytonians how tough we really are! Chieftain!

Chieftain is way to easy. Lets go with Deity
 
It think it's safe to say that 100 players are less efficiant than one player!! We don't want to get caned before we can establish a large empire. Some of the most fun parts of this demogame have been establishing provinces, building NPs, winning wars having lots of people involved as Governors and Mayors. These would be impossible, or more difficult, as a small empire. I don't think we should play any higher than Monarch.
 
I'm tempted to agree with the poofy wig guy. An easy civ game would allow for more fun in the demo game role playing area. But, I voted emperor because we just can't play at a lower level than they do at that other site.
 
We won this game quite easily, our power not being in question since the end of the first domino war. I say emperor.
 
How about that, Eyrei! I also went with Emperor. This game was way too easy.
 
And was pretty much sealed in the 2nd Domino Wars against Greece, and the Iroquois Incursion.
 
I vote Monarch, or at least no higher than emporer. And it is true, more people are less efficient, but on the other hand every minute detail gets scrutinized as opposed to the lazy way I play.

Oh wait, that might just be me....
 
I like Emporer too. Even though the process is more important than the challenge of the game, it might be more interesting if the challenge was greater.
 
Back
Top Bottom