What is the most harmless "crime"?

CCA

Emperor
Joined
Jul 13, 2003
Messages
1,449
What in your opinion is the least harmless crime.
Crime as defined by your countries laws.

IMHO it's software piracy.
 
What in your opinion is the least harmless crime.
Crime as defined by your countries laws.

IMHO it's software piracy.

Certainly not; just because you don't see who you're stealing from, you're still stealing.

I'll say using marijuana with a prescription.
 
It's got to be one of things like how your cat would have to wear a bell to warn birds about the cat's whereabouts.
 
Possession of marijuana. Harms nobody.

Software piracy hurts people who make software.
 
Jaywalking
Banging a prostitute
Smoking weed
Underage drinking/drug use
Breaking curfew
 
I say jaywalking as the most harmless. However all the other suggestions are also pretty harmless too
 
Jaywalking is much more disruptive (albeit not much in the actual sense) than a chemo patient taking THC.
 
Accidentally peep at a girl chest.
Accidentally touch a girl
walking up the stair behind a girl with ultra short skirt
Flirting
Adultery
Showing the middle finger
Walking naked in the house


Not paying respect to a king/royal/VIP/president etc etc (but not implying insulting or abusing)
 
-Speeding 5-10 mph over the speed limit.

-Insurance fraud (because insurance IS fraud :lol:)

-jaywalking is definitely here somewhere.

-trespassing on private property

-downloading any digital content

-smoking marijuana and underage drinking/smoking
 
Those are crimes?
:crazyeye:

yeah, in singapore.

If ur in the house naked but never close the window and some neighbour complain, u will get fine. hell, if ur neighbour took the picture, they will be posted on newspaper.

If the girl decided to charge u for peeping, u will be getting in trouble also.
 
The mattress tags say "except by the consumer", too. If you bought the mattress, you can rip the tag off legally.

I'm tempted to say marijuana, but honestly I think that breaking the speed limit is a better choice. Of course it can be harmful, but that's a function of the driver and each driver ought to be assigned a speed limit.

I'd pick underage drinking next. Complications aside, underage drinking is no more harmful than of-age drinking.

BTW, the thread title and the OP contradict each other. One's "most harmless" and the other is "least harmless" ... sort of confusing, there.
 
walking up the stair behind a girl with ultra short skirt

That shouldn't be a crime; it should be encouraged. It should be a crime for a girl in a short skirt to not walk up stairs.
 
There are the obvious trivial crimes - but what crimes do people think are very much harmless, whilst at the same time being counted as serious crimes?

* In the UK, photoshopping your adult girlfriend to look like she's under 18 (e.g., reduce breast size a bit and paste a school uniform on).
* Come to that, a naughty private picture of your 17 year old girlfriend (particularly interesting in the UK, where the age of consent is 16, but this would still be illegal).

Harmless or not? Both would be one of the most taboo crimes, namely, possession (and indeed, production of) child porn. (The first case has resulted in a conviction, though only a guy who also had actual child porn - in the sort of case I describe, I'd like to think the jury wouldn't convict, but right now it's illegal. The second case arose in 2003 in the UK when the definition of "child" rose from 16 to 18, but I don't know if there's ever been any convictions, particularly in the case of people in relationships.)
 
That shouldn't be a crime; it should be encouraged. It should be a crime for a girl in a short skirt to not walk up stairs.

But its always the case that some girls want to dress sexily but still like to cover when chatting with u.

Maybe they just want to show to BF but not other ppl. Or they enjoy enticing guys to "break the law"

hurhurhurhurhurhur. :mischief:
 
There are the obvious trivial crimes - but what crimes do people think are very much harmless, whilst at the same time being counted as serious crimes?

* In the UK, photoshopping your adult girlfriend to look like she's under 18 (e.g., reduce breast size a bit and paste a school uniform on).
* Come to that, a naughty private picture of your 17 year old girlfriend (particularly interesting in the UK, where the age of consent is 16, but this would still be illegal).

Harmless or not? Both would be one of the most taboo crimes, namely, possession (and indeed, production of) child porn.

Careful with that. I don't think a pair of sixteen-year-olds doing the nasty should count as child porn, but production of child porn featuring actual "children" is certainly not harmless.

Driving under the influence of marijuana is comparatively harmless (driving under the influence of vicodin is legal and much more dangerous), but people like to freak out about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom