What's your Civ3 eccentricity?

When I took a Native studies course at our local Native centre the Iroquois Confederacy was used as commonly as the Six Nations Confederacy. it denotes all the tribes/nations in the confederacy rather than an individual tribe.
 
Indeed, "Iroquois" is derived from the Algonquin "Iroq" meaning snake and French "ois" which as an individual word, means goose, and is a suffix similar to "ese" in English (hence you have words like "Québécois". And "ois" is pronounced something like "wah". Iroquois is on a similar level as the word "Indian", dating back to the times of New France, and "Haudenosaunee" should be used instead, but I doubt Firaxis will ever do that.

2 hrs later: I'm gonna smack you Bowsling, now you made me play Civ5 for another hour! :lol: I had to load the game to see the text and got ....stuck. :)

Civ5 is still using Iroquois, but they do mention the Haudenosaunee in a nice way as you start the game as Hiawatha.

The speaker and text says: In the mists of antiquity the five people - Seneca, Onondaga, Mohawks, Cayuga and Oneida, united into one nation, the Haudenosaunee, the Iroquois.

So maybe next time?

And was Mohawks really the name for that tribe? Sounds very strange to me, compared to the others. Mohegan, Mohican...is that the same tribe I'm thinking about?
 
Civ5 is a good game, I don't get all the hate. But we are in the forum for the best of the series. Now that you mention that, it seems familiar. I should know, given that my current Civ5 game is being played as the Iroquois. Mohawk is a Haudenausonee tribe, and Wikipedia tells me Mohican is an Algonquin tribe. So much for the "First of the Mohicans" achievement.
 
In general I only play the losers/underdogs of history. (i have never played America more than twenty turns and Rome+China+Brittain only once) It is not nice to win with someone who did win. So that means Byzantion (the most badluck type of them all) is one of my favorites. Persia with first the Greeks and then the Arabs and off course Carthage also is a big loser I play alot. Long live the underdogs!
 
Iroquois is on a similar level as the word "Indian", dating back to the times of New France, and "Haudenosaunee" should be used instead, but I doubt Firaxis will ever do that.
How-duh-no-sow-nay?
 
In general I only play the losers/underdogs of history. (i have never played America more than twenty turns and Rome+China+Brittain only once) It is not nice to win with someone who did win. So that means Byzantion (the most badluck type of them all) is one of my favorites. Persia with first the Greeks and then the Arabs and off course Carthage also is a big loser I play alot. Long live the underdogs!

so you just ignore the fact that the Meado/Persian empire was one of the great early empires? :confused:
 
My culture always seems to rise above all others, peak, and then go down to normal. :/
 
so you just ignore the fact that the Meado/Persian empire was one of the great early empires? :confused:

Former glory, they are "dead" now. Carthage was big as well before Rome came.

Or the Byzantine Empire, for that matter...

And Byzantion ain't Rome. Rome was mostly big and expanding. When Rome became Byzantion they started to get powned. Leaving the ranks of world's superpowers and going to city state size... And they are now gone off course.
 
My eccentricity (or insanity) is that I never stop perfecting maps/units/stats for my scenarios... I'm not kidding fella's, I can work on those things for years!

Example, my first scenario from 2002(!) is a World War II scenario (well, we've all tried doing those, right?). Current version is called 8E World War IIh. Like my big version of Rise of Rome I completely wiped away the first versions and started on a new map a few years ago.

Spoiler :


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


I bet I'll never ever finish this.
 
Former glory, they are "dead" now. Carthage was big as well before Rome came.
So Germany is one of your favorites, too, right? I mean, been around for less than 200 years, and all they can really say is that they've lost two World Wars in a row. And Spain and France got their respective empires ripped to shreds. Britain doesn't have an empire anymore, either. And Russia is pretty much a goner .... Well, let's just look at the empires that *aren't* "underdogs" ... uh, the US? I mean, Rome had its thousand years, but it basically fell over and died, and doesn't even really have the excuse of foreign invasions, as it was internal problems that really killed it. China? Owned in pretty much every war since the 1200s. Korea? Barely distinct from China for much of its history. The Celts? Kicked to the curb by the Romans and Germanic tribes, after fighting amongst themselves way too much.

And Byzantion ain't Rome. Rome was mostly big and expanding. When Rome became Byzantion they started to get powned. Leaving the ranks of world's superpowers and going to city state size... And they are now gone off course.

Yeah, the Eastern Roman Empire was not Roman. :rolleyes: And they went to city-state size over the course of a thousand years of existence - yes, the Eastern Roman Empire continued to exist long after the Western Roman Empire had fallen into the dirt, and probably the single biggest cause of the "city-state size" is the disembowelling suffered during the 4th Crusade, which carved up the Balkan territories into Latin holdings.
 
yes, the Eastern Roman Empire continued to exist long after the Western Roman Empire had fallen into the dirt, and probably the single biggest cause of the "city-state size" is the disembowelling suffered during the 4th Crusade, which carved up the Balkan territories into Latin holdings.

Curse those crusaders!:deadhorse:

But seriously, living civs still have a change fro greatness, lost civ's don't. I am the kind of person that would like the loser to be the victor, juts to now what would have happened then. And if that was so, I would want it the other way around.
 
My eccentricity (or insanity) is that I never stop perfecting maps/units/stats for my scenarios... I'm not kidding fella's, I can work on those things for years!

Example, my first scenario from 2002(!) is a World War II scenario (well, we've all tried doing those, right?). Current version is called 8E World War IIh. Like my big version of Rise of Rome I completely wiped away the first versions and started on a new map a few years ago.

Spoiler :


Uploaded with ImageShack.us


I bet I'll never ever finish this.

Wow, that is just impressive. Wish I had that kind of skill!

I have a hard time declaring war on America and I know my games suffer because of it sometimes. On the other hand, if they declare war on me fiirst . . . :hammer:
 
I hate pop rushing because it's not right to kill your own citizens.
In my mind the reduced population is due to people fleeing the tyrant, not working themselves to death. I won't be a tyrant always, so this works for me. But I know the advisor says "... will cause the lives of x citizens."
 
Wow, that is just impressive. Wish I had that kind of skill!

I have a hard time declaring war on America and I know my games suffer because of it sometimes. On the other hand, if they declare war on me fiirst . . . :hammer:

Usually, it's the opposite for me. I deteriorate my position by going out of the way to destroy America. Of course, that's coming from a Mad Canuck.:D
 
I rename all my units and designate them to separate armys. ie: 1st cossack will be in the same army as 1st tank etc. Size of armys vary from 10 to 20 units generally and don't include infantry. I also make note of their strengths before, during and after wars, Sacking non existent cammanders if they perform badly.

Last night I unleashed 4th Army (home army) on the Byzantines wich caught them completely by surprise as up to that point they were only aware of the existence of 3 of my armys. He he he.

BTW does anyone know how to rename entire groups of units all at once? is this possible?
 
:lol:

You poor man.

I'm actually playing the damn thing right now. Usually I just play the first few turns, then quit to fix something that irks me, but this time I'll try and see how far I get.

Well, your's is in fact at a stage where it's playable (I guess one could call it an alpha or beta version). Age of the Mongols exists mostly on the drawing board, and when I think I'm ready to actually start, it goes back to the drawing board because I'm unhappy with it for various reasons, or because I lose momentum due to other distractions or real life stuff.

I have a .biq map almost completed (still need to place units, buildings, etc), though it's like the fifth or sixth version of it since I started the project, so...
 
Usually, it's the opposite for me. I deteriorate my position by going out of the way to destroy America. Of course, that's coming from a Mad Canuck.:D

Ah, don't think we Minnesotans don't have a plan for the eventual invasion. The only hitch is that after Fargo no one can tell a true blue Minnesotan from a Mad Canuck so the military shut down the ammunitions plant and gave us all whiffle bats. The good new is that it will take us a while to kill you. The bad news is that it will take us a while to kill you. :scan:
 
Back
Top Bottom