Where does CFC Rank in all forums?

Status
Not open for further replies.
MarineCorps said:
And CG and Curt. But I can't imagine who he's missing :mischief:

Me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :p



Btw does that forum ranking include every forum on the net or just those tat use particular forum software?
 
Dell19 said:
Aren't you forgetting someone?

I assuming that deleted thrads couldn't reduce post count otherwise my post count would always be going up and down...

I gotcha, no worries. Note your place of honour in my Sig (along with 2 Mod. SPAMMERS!!!) *ahem*

I think Archer will be the next to earn a position. if Curt gets to 20k, I will need to think of a better name.
 
Archer 007 said:
That will include me soon enough.

Hopefully tonight. Come on Archer, you can do it! only like 15 to go.
 
RealGoober said:
I gotcha, no worries. Note your place of honour in my Sig (along with 2 Mod. SPAMMERS!!!) *ahem*

I think Archer will be the next to earn a position. if Curt gets to 20k, I will need to think of a better name.
It's nothing to be proud of.

And some of us (*hint*) got there fr posting consistently over a period of 3 years, rather than thru blatant OT spamming. :p
 
XIII said:
And some of us (*hint*) got there fr posting consistently over a period of 3 years, rather than thru blatant OT spamming. :p

Probably with periods of excessive spam at some points though...
 
Hmm, so there are what 5-6 people over 10K now? Curts no longer special. :p Through I wonder how long it will take him to get over 20K. :hmm:
 
There is nothing special about having more than 10k posts... It just happens to be a number that people easily remember... Besides Curt still has the most posts.
 
MarineCorps said:
Through I wonder how long it will take him to get over 20K. :hmm:

Not very long with "proof god exists" threads.
I still can't believe we're only 195! :cry:
If it's based on total # of posts,
Can we spam? :mischief:
 
LLXerxes said:
Not very long with "proof god exists" threads.
I still can't believe we're only 195! :cry:
If it's based on total # of posts,
Can we spam? :mischief:
The only way for us to catch up in any way is to ban moderators. I don't see that happening anytime soon...
 
If that is based purely on posts, do we want to catch up? It is much, much better to have 1 very detailed, and descriptive post then 100 spam posts, isn't it? Personally, if all we have to do to get to the top of that list is Spam, I don't think we would want to get there at all. I would prefer to be at the top of a list for have the most thoughtful, intelligent posts that were spam free, then be at the top of a list for sheer number of posts. Quality over Quantity.

*waits for all the OTers to get on my case (not literally)*
 
It also offers other comparison methods, none of which are very effective. (unless that rating thing is)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom