jlim201
King
Which civ do you believe needs changing most? What would you like changes to be?
India is unique in the fact that it is both bad and boring. Everyone else on the list is either one or the other.
America plays like it's tailor made for lategame domination victories. Which is in my opinion OK from a pure gameplay perspective but once again weird flavor-wise. The buffed Minutemen are very nice and everyone loves Bombers anyway. I can see why a lot of people are unhappy with America as it is now.
...Isn't late game domination pretty much one of the things real world America has proven very good at? The other one I'd pick them for is culture but having America as a warmonger that comes alive in the 19th and 20th centuries is perfectly acceptable flavor wise and is quite strong gameplay wise (Minutemen are the fourth best melee unit in the game with the Impi, Carolean, and Janissary in front of it and then there's a huge drop off after the Minutemen).
It is still kinda boring though. As much as I'd like a late game culture civ with fancy Great Works of Cinema there are other civs that need the boost more.
obviously indonesia, even the opening naration needs a change. Lets list the change needed.
1. UA, too situational! Why not give the first luxes a capital?
2. UB, again too situational, its hard enough to find a other 'continent', why did they think that you also needs a fresh water source.
3. UU, AGAIN too situational, have you got 3 bad promotions in a row? What should i do next? Restart?
4. Another UU rant, i never found any majapahit history saying that there is a squad armed with the kris daggers as primary weapon, even more imposible with kris swords.
5. The candi icon, C'MON firaxis! Its a split gate icon you put there, some people called it 'candi bentar', but its not a candi, its like you put a bike (bycicle) icon for a motorbike unit!
6. And of course the spanish narrator.