Which Civ we should have before Civilization VI?

[altayrneto]

To for a (in my opinion, improbable) new DLC or expansion, which civ is lacking to make the game experience perfect?

 

[IkM]

Definitely Khazars.

then Göktürks, Timurids, Hungary etc.

 

[Gucumatz]

Why put in Australia or Canada and take space up that could be used to put civs in your poll?

 

[Altisma]

Why is Italy always missing on these polls?

 

[El Caballerion]

Israel and Tibet would actually make the most sense. I vote for those two. Screw the controversy!

 

[Louis XXIV]

A select one (as opposed to multiple) and not one of the more suggested ones (Vietnam)?

I'm going to say:

Vietnam
Mississippians
Kongo
Haida

All of which I guess are in the Other category

I'd also like the Khmer, but I think that's a lower priority. The reason being that it's better to have something unlike that which we've already seen, not different but arguably better.

 

[Pythakoreas]

Oh, canada... Our home and native land...

true patriot love in all thy sons command...

 

[Randall_Flagg]

Travancore

This has been my favorite all time civ since I played UE III.

 

[superliminal]

Uqbar, led by the noted Heresiarch.

 

[SirPepsi]

My order:

1) Canada
2) Australia
3) Argentina
4) Italy or remake the Roman Empire to include modern Italy
5) Philippines
6) South Africa
7) Nigeria
8) Thai or Cambodia (Khmer)
9) Nepal
10) Sumer
11) Mexico
12) Hittites
13) Mali
14) Peru
15) Ukraine/Norway
16) Norway/Ukraine

 

[Louis XXIV]

Given that both Rome and Venice are in the game, I find it unlikely for an Italian Civ before Civ6 (if you think they should add it for Civ6 or remake Rome into an Italian Civ then, that's different, but it still seems unlikely for Civ5).

 

[ptoss1]

Vancouver

 

[OmniPotent42]

Sioux
Inuit
Texas

All North American, we need more of those.

 

[Byzantine Bomb]

So many good options but I voted for Kongo. I'd like to see some less more variety.
The Khazars, Tumrids and Hungary would be cool too though.

 

[Aztecopi]

Finland, or more exactly the city of Turku with all the city parts as huge metropolises.


Seriously no Canada, it's not needed.

 

[Snes]

Israel has my vote. Why exclude them and Tibet from the poll? Just because you're not a fan doesn't mean they should be excluded from consideration.

 

[caketastydelish]

If HRE gets included, I will have two questions.

1) Does this mean Germany loses that Pikeman UU and it goes to the HRE?
2) If this is the case, can they modify them so they don't suck?

edit:

Why are people naming single states of America such as Texas or Mississippi? If that's supposed to be joke ok but I don't see why they'd seriously do that. Anyway, Mali, Sioux, Sumeria and Khmer are the best poll options listed IMO.

But if Israel gets listed I'm guessing they would have a religious UA of course. So then religious players would have three Civs to choose from (Byzantine, Celts, Israel).

final edit: We have too many Euro civs already IMO. The only other one I'd even consider adding is Hungary, and that's only because of their 'relationship' with Turkey. I mean, if Rhey ever *does* make a RFC for Civ 5 I'd want Turkey/Hungary in there.

 

[SirPepsi]

Israel has my vote. Why exclude them and Tibet from the poll? Just because you're not a fan doesn't mean they should be excluded from consideration.

I believe the OP was trying to be diplomatic. Let's also be realistic - should either Tibet or Israel be introduced into the game, the CiV series would suffer a publicity hit (I doubt they'd even be willing to take the risk).

 

[kingofsealand]

Estonia! Or possibly some kind of cross civ addressing latvia lithuania and estonia collectively

 

[Aztecopi]

Estonia! Or possibly some kind of cross civ addressing latvia lithuania and estonia collectively

Got an idea from your name...

I want Sealand!!!!