Who should represent the Native Americans in civ 6?

[ldvhl]

Right, and have the Inuit possibly build The Great Library (for example) ?

No better or worse than Germany, Japan, or America buildling it.

You are defying the laws of Historical Civilizations by gifting (nomadic) tribes same attributes as real CIVILIZATIONS.

I'm sorry, what laws?

It's fun, I got to say, but when Huns beat me to a Great Wonder, and I'm playing as Egypt, it turns to mockery.

Not really. It's a game. People are allowed to play. There's no "mockery" intended nor performed.

 

[Monado]

Although historically total nonsense, this could really work, if they gave this NATIVE civilization North American Native Tribe names as City Names.
Why not?
My proposition is as follows:

Civilization Name: NATIVE AMERICA
LEADERS: Sitting Bull, Hiawatha, Tecumseh (a bunch of other possibilities)
UNIQUE UNITS: Brave, Dog Warrior, Mohawk Warrior

Historically, complete nonsense, but hey, it's only a game.

You basically just listed the Civ 4 blob civ which offended many people in the first place.
http://www.civfanatics.com/civ4/info/civilizations/
Native Americans - Sitting Bull - Dog Soldier
-Changing city names to Tribe names I don't see as an improvement what so ever.

How about this...we combine the Inuit and the Canadians into one civ. They are close to each other territoriality their cultures must be the same. We will call it The Northern North Americans. Leader Wayne Gretzky UU Seal clubber. UU dudley do right.

Historically complete nonsense, but hey, it's only a game.

Moderator Action: Please avoid mocking sarcasm.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

Just not the Inuit, please!
The game is called Civilization, not Tribes!
While very original and interesting, the Inuit cannot play on par with Rome or China, otherwise the game's turning to garbage.

Canada (with serious leaders/UU's and UA's)..which you are backing in the Canada thread...cannot be compared to the historic Rome or China, then the game will turn to garbage if they play on par with them according to your own statement?


Maybe I'm just having trouble understanding these last three statements, but you kind of go to opposite ends of the spectrum in those statements. From "Combine all NA tribes into one, it's only a game" to:

Right, and have the Inuit possibly build The Great Library (for example) ?
You are defying the laws of Historical Civilizations by gifting (nomadic) tribes same attributes as real CIVILIZATIONS.
It's fun, I got to say, but when Huns beat me to a Great Wonder, and I'm playing as Egypt, it turns to mockery.

Its a mockery that defies the "laws of Historical Civilizations" (whatever that means) to have something not up to your views of perfectly Historical.

 

[daft]

You basically just listed the Civ 4 blob civ which offended many people in the first place.
http://www.civfanatics.com/civ4/info/civilizations/
Native Americans - Sitting Bull - Dog Soldier
-Changing city names to Tribe names I don't see as an improvement what so ever.

How about this...we combine the Inuit and the Canadians into one civ. They are close to each other territoriality their cultures must be the same. We will call it The Northern North Americans. Leader Wayne Gretzky UU Seal clubber. UU dudley do right.

Historically complete nonsense, but hey, it's only a game.

You are just trying to counter valid points by typing such illogical stuff up.
Are you telling me the Inuit are more deserving to be included in a game which deals with the history of earth's civilization than Canada is?
If so, then arguing with you makes no sense. You are deprived of knowledge of what a nation, and especially, a civilization, is.

Canada (with serious leaders/UU's and UA's)..which you are backing in the Canada thread...cannot be compared to the historic Rome or China, then the game will turn to garbage if they play on par with them according to your own statement?

Germany's been in since civI and it hasn't been a single nation since the 19th century!
Ancient Greece was a bunch of city states, often at war with each other! then occupied by Ottoman Turks for centuries, in the game since CI.
Should I name you more examples!
Should I remind you that India, as such, hasn't at all existed for long?
Why don't you study the histories of all the (often so-called) nations/tribes/civs already in the game and stop picking on my country or the fact that I like to differentiate nomadic barbarians from real civilizations!

Maybe I'm just having trouble understanding these last three statements, but you kind of go to opposite ends of the spectrum in those statements. From "Combine all NA tribes into one, it's only a game" to:


Its a mockery that defies the "laws of Historical Civilizations" (whatever that means) to have something not up to your views of perfectly Historical.

Mockery is the fact that HALF-BARBARIC TRIBES/NOMADS have same rights in the game as great civilizations!

Do not mix my posts from other threads into one and pretend to be smart on me!


Moderator Action: Please keep discussion in a civil tone or this thread will be closed
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[leif erikson]

Moderator Action: This thread has been closed for review by staff and to allow some time for participants to cool off. If you have an issue with a post, please report the post as this kind of escalation of getting personal and uncivil is not allowed.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889