- Joined
- Oct 23, 2011
- Messages
- 2,245
I don't foresee the inclusion of the Mississippians/Cahokians. Why? Because they were already on sharp decline by the time the first Spaniards moved through the area and were gone by the time the Spaniards got back. We don't know enough about them to make them a viable civilization; it would be like trying to include the Halstatt culture as a civilization. Now, one of the Mississippians descendants like the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek, or Natchez could work.
We know enough about them to create our unique attributes though, an that's the minimum requirement. The only thing realistically standing in there way is the lack of a named leader that I know of. That is solvable as well though. Carthage has a mythical leader, Spain has a leader from 200 years before Spain existed. Greece uses a Macedonian (I know similar culture, but stick with me here...)
Why not have a Mississippian civ with a unique and a leader from a later era to tie it together through history? More likely we'll have a Cherokee or other modern civ with Mississippian attributes, but that would make me a little sad that they've not got the credit they deserve

I am not sure what you meant by this (bolded part), but I live in New Mexico and have a pretty good understanding of the pueblos and their culture. All the rest I agree with completely.
By that I meant that firaxis have been told by the pueblos that they do not want to be represented in this game. I don't think they would feel great if firaxis used a civilization who they claim descendancy from instead. It amounts to the same thing, but with potentially even more insult layered on top by in their eyes disrespecting not just their culture but also their dead