Then please read the opening post.AlCosta said:It doesn't have to be, but you should feel bad if you don't. I can't name a reason without using Religion, and you're obviously not Catholic, so you won't listen to my example.

Then please read the opening post.AlCosta said:It doesn't have to be, but you should feel bad if you don't. I can't name a reason without using Religion, and you're obviously not Catholic, so you won't listen to my example.
GodIsGay said:Now think of it from the pizza guy's perspective.
There are people who will always give the same good tips no matter the time of delivery, simply because they are that way. After a while he will realise that and then decide to go to those who only tip well for fast delivery first and only after that to the one always giving good tips. He would then take advantage of their general generosity or whatever makes them tip well every time.
But for the pizza guy it makes sense. Why would it be morally wrong?
That's not really the point, is it.GodIsGay said:2. You think you shouldn't do onto others that which you would not have them do onto you.
Reply: You can't influence their behavior. Just because you don't do it doesn't mean they will return the favor. In the same vein doing it won't automatically mean getting to the recieving end of it. Simply put, life ain't fair.
De Lorimier said:Or as she calls it: breakfast.
Xanikk999 said:I beileve lying is Ok as long as it does not benefit you unless it would hurt you or if the lie doesnt hurt or disadvantage anyone.
So basically i would lie to get out of trouble if the people would not find out later.
Of course he does. They will never get a fast delivery, simply because they are generous. He decides against them and in favor of the others because of how they are and because it benefits him. He thus takes advantage of them.Ecclesiastes said:Then he wouldnt be taking advantage of them, THEY pay him to come and THEY tip him, its not as if hes tricking them every time he gets to the door into giving them a tip or using there own gullibilaty against them.
Well, I never said they should realise it. That could of course have results that no longer benefit you and would defeat the point.Rambuchan said:GodIsGay: Just for your info, I do not take advantage of other people (especially those less fortunate) because I am situated between 2 and 3 in the OP. There may be residues of 1 still kicking about too. But there's also the old 'what goes around comes around'. Sounds cliched, but it does, somehow, someday. I also feel that you're taking a pretty cynical view of humans with your refutations. Not everyone is as sick as the pizza guy you're on about and people tend to react well to kindness. They tend to reflect back the emotions being projected onto them. They assimilate to the behaviour of those around them. Oops, there's another one for your list![]()
GodIsGay said:2. You think you shouldn't do onto others that which you would not have them do onto you.
Reply: You can't influence their behavior. Just because you don't do it doesn't mean they will return the favor. In the same vein doing it won't automatically mean getting to the recieving end of it. Simply put, life ain't fair.
Okay, as I said in the first post it's pointless to argue with that.AlCosta said:Okay, my religion (Roman Catholic) sees that we help the less fortunate (and as a result, not take advantage of them) as our Lord (Jesus) did this. And we are made to be in Jesus' image, so we must follow that.
GodIsGay said:Now think of it from the pizza guy's perspective.
There are people who will always give the same good tips no matter the time of delivery, simply because they are that way. After a while he will realise that and then decide to go to those who only tip well for fast delivery first and only after that to the one always giving good tips. He would then take advantage of their general generosity or whatever makes them tip well every time.
But for the pizza guy it makes sense. Why would it be morally wrong?
And that is bad because...?Ecclesiastes said:Becuase you are denying someone the use of something they own, thats why.
GodIsGay said:And that is bad because...?
Read the rest of my replies, please. I am talking about situations where they won't get it. Where you will NOT have any direct negative results from it, only they will have those.dh_epic said:You made one of the most cognitive errors which is looking for a case that confirms your hypothesis, rather than looking for exceptions.
Yes, absolutely, you could imagine a circumstance where you play the nice guy and someone screws you over.
But what if you play the ***hole? Then people will DEFINITELY not trust you. That reputation will get around fast. Say tomorrow you decided to screw your best friend by going out for lunch, and then running away before the bill comes. You'll lose that friend, and likely more friends than that.
Taking advantage of other people is a surefire way to isolate yourself. So if you're gonna do it, you have to be damn well sure that you don't need anybody. And in this world, people need people. Hate it or learn to love it.
There is no such thing as basic ethics.Xanikk999 said:I wont bother with you. You are just playing dumb. If you can type and spell correctly you should know basic ethics.
GodIsGay said:Read the rest of my replies, please. I am talking about situations where they won't get it. Where you will NOT have any direct negative results from it, only they will have those.