[WIP] Logical Patch

[Genghis.Khan]

About the Project

Spoiler :

There are many small illogical and irreal features in Civilization 5: Gods and Kings. Some of them are very small, and some are really easy to be corrected. That`s why I decided to, in a single ModPack, correct as many features as possible. I created this thread to handle Requests and Sugestion from all members of the community

List of Planned Changes
Suggestions, ideas and requests welcome

[AI]

. Reduce Denunciation and DOF Expire Time SQL
. Set the Peace Deal Time as Negociable - Need help with code
. Reduce AI Warmonger Hate SQL
. Change AI Opinion Weights SQL
. Make AI less like to settle if you have a big military power SQL

[WONDERS]

. Temple of Artemis gives you now food instead of Growth

Spoiler :

Artemis was a virgin goddess... It seems stupid to gives you Growth

[BUILDINGS]

.Theatre is now a culture buidling (+3 +1 )

[CITIES]

.Cities have now only 80 per cent of the original
.Cities now only lose 10 per cent of their when captured
.After discovering Dynamite Cities Gain +1

[UNITS]

.Units cost 30 per cent less
.Lancer Changes (?)
.Uprgrade Paths Changes Need Ideas

[GLOBAL]

.3 Units per Tile
.Tradeable Maps (Hopefully if assets still exist)
.Tech Trading
.Less Increase Rate
.New Names

 

[Genghis.Khan]

Reserved

 

[Genghis.Khan]

Ideas, Requests and Sugestions are Welcome

 

[notadummy]

not sure how I feel about the units costing 30% less production...this would allow the AI to spam even more units.

Also, what does "Cities have now only 80 per cent of the original " mean?

Other changes look fine to me.

 

[Genghis.Khan]

City Strenght is Reduced by 20%

Well, that will allow the AI to spam 30 per cent more units... You gain that bonus too...

 

[Sir Shfvingle]

Why is "Reduce AI Warmonger Hate" crossed out?

 

[Genghis.Khan]

Already done. Less than 1kb sized .sql file Download from Here

 

[Genghis.Khan]

Need Sugestions

 

[Genghis.Khan]

Feel Free to Ask to Remove Features if you provide logical reasons

 

[Sir Shfvingle]

I don't know if this goes into opinion weights, but is it possible to stop that "cascading" denunciation? What I mean is that one one civ denounces you, it holds a lot of weight with all the other civs in the game, who then, over the course of 5 turns or so, all proceed to denounce you as well. Maybe make it so only other hostile civs are likely to denounce you along with the first one?

 

[Genghis.Khan]

I will look at the AI Defines... Maybe...